Australia: Plaintiff fails to use rule in Jones v Dunkel and Section 5C of the Civil Liability Act to overturn judgment against her following fall down stairs - Youkhana v Di Veroli and Ors [2010] NSWCA 322

Curwoods Case Note
Last Updated: 29 November 2010
Article by Nicholas Gordon

Judgment date: 19 November

2010 Youkhana v Di Veroli and Ors [2010] NSWCA 322

NSW Court of Appeal1

In Brief

The Court of Appeal confirmed the limits to the application of the rule in Jones v Dunkel, and the utility for defendants in relying on defences under Section 5C of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (CLA).


On 24 February 2003 the plaintiff went to the premises of Limited Edition Holdings Pty Ltd (Limited Edition) at Erskineville for the first time. The plaintiff had been contracted as a sales consultant with Limited Edition since 2001. Limited Edition was named as fourth defendant but was wound up and took no part in the proceedings.

The defendants had owned the building since 1988, which was used for commercial purposes. There were timber stairs leading from the ground floor to the first floor. The stairs were very old (at least 50 years) and they were not fitted with any anti-slip nosings or abrasive strips at the time the plaintiff was injured. They were fitted with a rectangular handrail and it appeared at some point a polyurethane or similar finish had been applied to the stairs.

As the plaintiff was descending the stairs, and as she reached the third step from the top, she slipped on the front of the step and fell down the remaining stairs to the first landing, approximately 3 or 4 stairs, sustaining injuries.

The defendants, within weeks of the plaintiff's fall, applied non-slip strips to the nosing treads of the stairs, and also applied aluminium nosing and timber packers, but not until 2006 after the proceedings had been commenced.

The plaintiff commenced proceedings in the Supreme Court against the defendants.

Supreme Court Decision

The trial judge, James J, noted that the plaintiff's claim was governed by the CLA, and in particular ss 5B and 5C which provides as follows:

"5B General Principles

(1) A person is not negligent in failing to take precautions against a risk of harm unless:

(a) the risk was foreseeable (that is, it is a risk of which the person knew or ought to have known), and

(b) the risk was not insignificant, and

(c) in the circumstances, a reasonable person in the person's position would have taken those precautions.

(2) In determining whether a reasonable person would have taken precautions against a risk of harm, the court is to consider the following (amongst other relevant things):

(a) the probability that the harm would occur if care were not taken,

(b) the likely seriousness of the harm,

(c) the burden of taking precautions to avoid the risk of harm,

(d) the social utility of the activity that creates the risk of harm.

5C Other principles

"In proceedings relating to liability for negligence:

(a) the burden of taking precautions to avoid a risk of harm includes the burden of taking precautions to avoid similar risks of harm for which the person may be responsible, and

(b) the fact that a risk of harm could have been avoided by doing something in a different way does not of itself give rise to or affect liability for the way in which the thing was done, and

(c) the subsequent taking of action that would (had the action been taken earlier) have avoided a risk of harm does not of itself give rise to or affect liability in respect of the risk and does not of itself constitute an admission of liability in connection with the risk."

James J noted that it was also necessary to apply authoritative statements which have been made about the extent of an occupier's liability and particularly in relation to stairs on the premises of the occupier. In this regard James J quoted from the judgment of Heydon JA in Wilkinson v Law Courts Limited [2001] NSWCA 196 as follows:

" occupier of premises is only required to take such care as is reasonable in the circumstances. The duty is not to make the premises as safe as reasonable care and skill on the part of any one can make them.


Stairs are inherently, but obviously, dangerous. Many measures might have been taken to make the stairs as safe as human skill could possibly make them; but the duty is only to take care which is reasonable under the circumstances. Among the essential circumstances is the following fact: 'persons using steps may misjudge their footing and slip or trip but this is an everyday risk which members of the public avoid by taking care for their own safety' ".

James J then considered the submission by the plaintiff that there should be an adverse inference made against the defendants, pursuant to the principles in the case of Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8, because the defendants failed to adduce evidence as to whether or not there had been any prior incidents on the stairs or complaints about the stairs and whether a fresh polyurethane coating had been applied to the stairs from time to time which might have made the stairs more slippery. In dismissing this argument, James J stated that the rule "cannot be applied so as to fill gaps in the evidence or to convert conjecture or suspicion into an inference", and accordingly proceeded on the basis that there was no evidence of any previous accident involving a person slipping or falling on the stairs or any previous complaints.

In response to the plaintiff's submissions concerning the defendant's subsequent actions in modifying the stairs demonstrating what the defendants should have done prior to the accident, James J noted that the plaintiff was barred from relying on the defendants' subsequent actions as of themselves affecting liability by virtue of the provisions of s 5C (c) of the CLA.

James J preferred the expert evidence of Dr Cooke over the evidence of Mr Adams. In this regard, the primary judge accepted that the coefficient of friction readings of Dr Cooke on worn areas of the stairs, taken more than three years after the plaintiff's accident, provided a reasonable guide that the contribution to the risk of slipping was moderate to very low. James J found that the stairs were old, that the stairs were not very steep, that each part of the stairs contained only a few steps, that at the time the plaintiff was using the stairs the stairs were well lit, and that there was no feature of the design of the stairs which would not have been obvious to any users. For the above reasons James J held that the plaintiff had not established that there was a foreseeable risk of a person slipping on the stairs which was not insignificant such that a reasonable person in the position of the defendants would have taken precautions against that risk. Alternatively, James J stated that he did not consider that it had been established that the defendants failed to take such care as was reasonable in the circumstances.

Accordingly the plaintiff's claim failed and she appealed to the Court of Appeal.

Court of Appeal Decision

Hodgson JA, who wrote the unanimous decision, turned first to the ground of appeal concerning a possible adverse inference that should have been drawn against the defendants pursuant to Jones v Dunkel.

Hodgson JA affirmed James J's decision that there was no basis on which Jones v Dunkel should be adversely applied to the defendants.

Hodgson JA emphasised that the onus was on the plaintiff to prove that there was a foreseeable risk against which a reasonable person in the position of the defendants would have taken precautions, and that James J acted appropriately to comment that there was no evidence of prior falls or prior complaints that could have helped the plaintiff to discharge that onus.

Hodgson JA rejected the plaintiff's submissions that the primary judge should not have accepted the evidence of Dr Cooke on the basis there was no material error shown in the primary judge's findings.

The other primary ground of appeal by the plaintiff concerned s 5C(c) of the CLA.

It was accepted that the defendants had, within weeks of the plaintiff's fall, applied non-slip strips to the nosing treads of the stairs, and secondly in 2006 applied aluminium nosing and timber packers. The plaintiff sought to rely on the defendant's subsequent actions to support her argument that there were relatively minor and inexpensive steps that the defendants could have taken which would have avoided the risk of harm. The plaintiff submitted that James J erred in applying s 5C (c) of the CLA, arguing that it did not apply at all to measures taken once the precise risk at the time of the accident had ceased to exist, and so did not apply to the second set of measures taken in 2006.

However Hodgson JA found that James J did no more than correctly express the terms of s 5C(c), to the effect that subsequent actions do not of themselves affect liability or amount to admissions. His Honour did not accept that once there had been any change from the risk at the time of the accident s 5C(c) no longer applies.

All other weaker grounds of appeals were also rejected by the Court of Appeal and the plaintiff's appeal accordingly failed.


Whilst this decision turned on its facts, it again emphasises that claims of negligence are now firstly and primarily governed by the CLA, which clearly sets out the basis upon which a defendant may be found negligent.

The decision also confirms the limitations on parties seeking to rely on the rule in Jones v Dunkel. The onus of establishing negligence always rests with the plaintiff, and the fact that a defendant may not call evidence on each and every issue in dispute will not automatically lead to adverse inference being found against them.

The decision also illustrates how defendants can rely on s 5C (c) of the CLA in answer to an allegation that any subsequent steps taken by them to make premises safer should have been undertaken prior to the incident, as any subsequent step does not of itself give rise to or affect liability in respect of a risk and does not of itself constitute an admission of liability.

The decision highlights the importance of expert evidence in slip and fall claims particularly where there is conjecture as to the precise mechanics of the plaintiff's fall and the absence of evidence of any previous accidents or complaints.

1 Hodgson JA, Tobias JA, Campbell JA

Ranked No 1 - Australia's fastest growing law firm' (Legal Partnership Survey, The Australian July 2010)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.