Australia: The Sharks are Circling Parallel Importers of Trademarked Goods

Introduction

Brand owners interested in stopping parallel imports of their trademarked goods have been assisted by the recent decision of Nicholas J of the Federal Court of Australia in Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd v Paul's International Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 1162 (Sporte Leisure).

In the Sporte Leisure case, the Court held that Greg Norman branded clothing which had been manufactured by the exclusive Indian distributor of Great White Shark Enterprise's Inc, had been made outside the terms of its licence agreement and therefore the importation of those goods into Australia infringed various "Greg Norman" trade marks. However, before we discuss the Sporte Leisure case we first make some comments about what we mean when we talk about the 'parallel importation' of trademarked goods.

Parallel Importation

Parallel importation occurs when a trade mark is applied to goods overseas either by the owner of the trade mark in the overseas country or under a licence granted by them and the goods are then imported into Australia by someone who does not have the consent of the brand owner to do so. Importantly, the goods are 'genuine' rather than counterfeit.

The unauthorised parallel importation and sale of goods often competes with the sale of the same goods by an authorised Australian distributor. Somewhat understandably, the distributor is unlikely to look favourably upon competition by the parallel importer if the distributor has made a significant financial investment in order to obtain their distributorship.

The legality of the parallel importation of trademarked goods into Australia has long been problematic.

The Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (Act) was amended in 1995 to include, in section 123, a new defence to infringement of a registered trade mark. Section 123 says:

"... a person who uses a registered trade mark in relation to goods that are similar to goods in respect of which the trade mark is registered does not infringe the trade mark if the trade mark has been applied to, or in relation to, the goods by, or with the consent of, the registered owner of the trade mark." [emphasis added]

The stated purpose behind the introduction of this section was to give statutory protection to the legitimacy of parallel importation of trade-marked goods. In a 1995 report of the Australian Law Reform Commission, the ALRC said that as a result of this section, "importing and selling genuine trade marked goods by an 'unauthorised' Australian importer will not infringe the registered proprietor's trade mark in Australia". However, the position has not been quite so simple in practice.

What are the Trade Marks Issues Involved?

There are two legal arguments that are often made by parallel importers of trademarked goods in at attempt to avoid liability for trade mark infringement. First, parallel importers usually argue that the importation of legitimately trademarked goods does not involve a "use" of the trade mark by the parallel importer and therefore no question of infringement arises. Second, they argue that even if they have used the trade mark by importing the goods their conduct is excused by section 123 of the Trade Marks Act.

One difficulty with section 123 stems from the words: "with the consent of, the registered owner of the trade mark". If the overseas trade mark owner and the Australian trade mark owner are one and the same then the position is clear: a parallel importer has a good defence to a claim for trade mark infringement. However, if the trade mark in Australia is registered to a person different to the overseas trade mark owner then the question of 'consent' is more problematic.

Sporte Leisure is the latest in a series of cases since 2007 that have touched on similar issues. Given that, it is worthwhile looking briefly at those cases by way of background.

In the 2007 case of Brother Industries v Dynamic Supplies1, the defendant obtained from Brother America unbranded printer drum units manufactured by Brother Japan and packaged those units in packaging that bore Brother's trade marks. In that case, the Court commented that the fact that Brother America and Brother Japan are related entities within the same corporate group did not affect the clear and ordinary meaning and operation of section 123. The consent to apply Brother's Australian trade marks to or in relation to a product had to be given by Brother Japan. It considered that Brother Japan's consent was not to be implied from the fact that another member of the Brother corporate group may have given its consent.

The 2008 case of Polo/Lauren Company v Ziliani2 involved legal claims against a parallel importer based on copyright instead of trade marks. In that case, a Full Court of the Federal Court said that the Polo/Lauren Company had brought its claims in copyright (and not based on trade marks) because "[t]he importation into Australia of genuine goods bearing a trade mark legitimately affixed overseas is not an infringement of the local trade mark"3. However, this statement puts the position a little too broadly. Because the Court was dealing with copyright claims only, its statement does not bind other judges who are dealing with trade mark claims.

In 2009, in E&J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia4, a Full Court of the Federal Court held that the parallel importation of wine did constitute use of the "Barefoot" trade mark by the parallel importer5. However, the Full Court's judgment was overturned by the High Court of Australia earlier this year. Relevantly for present purposes, the wine in question had initially been sold to a distributor in Germany but had ultimately found its way to Australia and had been sold in Australia. The High Court held that the sale of this genuine "Barefoot" branded wine in Australia constituted use of the relevant trade mark in Australia by the registered trade mark owner. However, the High Court expressly said that it left open the question whether the importer had also used the trade mark (in addition to the registered trade mark owner)6. Given that, it is likely that the reasoning of the Full Court (which did consider that issue) will still be persuasive in later cases.

The Sporte Leisure Case

In Sporte Leisure, "BTB" was licensed by "GNC" to manufacture and sell Greg Norman branded clothing in India. GNC is the head licensor of the Greg Norman marks registered in India and Australia and elsewhere. It was conceded in the case that the trade marks in question had been used as trade marks when the goods were imported for sale into Australia. Therefore, the key issue was the issue of consent.

Under the terms of its licence, BTB had agreed not to sell outside India the clothing it made in India, unless it had GNC's consent. Despite that, it sold a shipment of clothing to "Sunsport", a company which operates primarily in Pakistan. That shipment was to be delivered to Pakistan via Singapore. However, the Singaporean-based agent of Sunsport procured the sale of the goods to Paul's Retail, which imported them into Australia. The Court held that in doing so Paul's Retail infringed the Greg Norman trade marks. Nicholas J said:

"Where a registered owner consents to another person applying the registered mark to goods on condition that the goods must not to be supplied outside a designated territory, the registered owner would not usually be regarded as having consented to the application of the mark to goods which the other person knows at the time he or she applies the mark are to be supplied by him or her outside the territory."7 [emphasis added]

Section 123 says that what matters is whether the trade mark was applied to goods with the consent of the registered owner and not, for example, whether the later sale of those goods was authorised by the trade mark owner. In the Sporte Leisure case, it appears that BTB made a special batch of clothing for Sunsport and, therefore, BTB knew that the application of the mark to those goods was outside its licence. The result may well have been different if Paul's Retail had obtained legitimate "Greg Norman" clothing from retailers in India and then imported that clothing into Australia. The Court said that whether a trade mark owner has consented to the application of a trade mark to particular goods ultimately depends on the facts of the case.

Practical Lessons

The Sporte Leisure case provides an additional weapon to trade mark owners in combating parallel imports if the products in question originate from a licensed manufacturer who knew that the application of the trade mark to those particular goods was not authorised by its licence agreement. However, the broader question of the legality of the parallel importation of trademarked goods remains problematic.

If the Full Court's reasoning in the E&J Gallo Winery case is correct (i.e. that parallel importers "use" a trade mark when importing goods into Australia for sale), then it appears that the only defence available to a parallel importer is that provided by s 123. In Sporte Leisure, the Court rejected the argument that an owner must also establish that the marks on the relevant goods have not been applied by or with their consent.

Ultimately, whether the owner of the registered trade mark in Australia has consented to the application of that mark to goods made overseas will depend on the facts of the particular case. However, it appears to be open to brand owners to combat parallel imports of trademarked goods by structuring their affairs so that the owner of the mark in Australia is not the same as the overseas mark owner and otherwise taking steps to negate the argument that the trade marks were applied with the consent of owner of the Australian mark.

The possibility of brand owners circumventing Australian trade marks law by ensuring that Australian trade marks are held by the Australian distributor and not the overseas brand owner has been recognised for some time and was criticised in the report of the Intellectual Property and Competition Review Committee" (Ergas Report) in September 2000. The Ergas Report recommended that the "Trade Marks Act be amended to ensure that the assignment provisions are not used to circumvent the intent to allow the parallel importation of legitimately trade marked goods". In 2001, the Federal Government accepted this recommendation and stated that: "the Trade Marks Act will be amended accordingly". Despite the fact that legislation was introduced in 2006 to amend other sections of the Trade Marks Act, section 123 was left untouched.


1 [2007] FCA 1490
2 [2008] FCAFC 195.
3 [2008] FCAFC 195 at [5].
4 [2009] FCAFC 27.
5 [2009] FCAFC 27 at [58].
6 [2010] HCA 15 at [53].
7 [2010] FCA 1162 at [78].

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.