Australia: Beware of falling branches : Rhodes v Lake Macquarie City Council & Anor [2010] NSWCA 235

Curwoods Case Note
Last Updated: 5 October 2010
Article by Nicholas Gordon

Judgment date: 13 September 2010. Rhodes v Lake Macquarie City Council & Anor [2010] NSWCA 2351. NSW Court of Appeal

In Brief

A public authority successfully relied on s 43 of the Civil Liability Act to avoid liability after a plaintiff was injured by a falling branch. Despite being found to have acted negligently, the Housing Corporation also succeeded because it was held that their negligence was not causative of the plaintiff's injuries.


The plaintiff had resided since about 1997 in a house at Booragul, owned by the Housing Corporation. During this period a large grey gum eucalyptus punctata tree had been situated on a neighbouring property, also owned by the Housing Corporation. This tree was about 18 metres high, and its canopy was about 14 metres wide. Its branches overhung at the driveway used for the purposes of gaining entry to the plaintiff's house.

Within a short time of occupying the premises the plaintiff noticed that branches would fall from the tree onto the front area of her house. In about 1999 the plaintiff's daughter was struck by a branch from the tree sustaining a minor scratch to her stomach. After this occurred, and on a number of subsequent occasions, the plaintiff complained to the Housing Corporation about falling debris from the tree and asked that it remove the tree. The tree was trimmed, possibly as much as once every year or 18 months, between about 2002 and 2005.

By an application dated 28 February 2005, the Housing Corporation applied to the Council for permission to remove the tree on the basis that it was unstable. On 18 April 2005 Mr Khemananta, an arborist who had delegated authority from the Council to authorise removal of trees in its area, attended the premises. Mr Khemananta prepared a report dated 20 April 2005, concluding that the removal of the tree was not warranted. Mr Khemananta refused the application on the basis that the tree appeared to be in a sound and stable condition and because the removal of the tree would be inconsistent with the objectives of the Council's Development Control Plan (DCP) No. 43 -Tree Management.

The Housing Corporation was, however, authorised to prune deadwood and thin the crown by 15% but height reduction was not permitted. This work was undertaken in June 2005 by another arborist, Mr Miller.

On 24 December 2005 the plaintiff was struck on the top of her head by a piece of timber from the tree. Mr Miller assessed the tree shortly afterwards on the same day. He did not see any branches on the ground, but saw what he described as a large hanger in the tree which he said was "still alive but had broken in the wind". No other hangers were observed.

The plaintiff sued both the Housing Corporation and the Council.

As part of its defence the Council relied upon the following provisions of the Civil Liability Act:

43 Proceedings against public or other authorities based on breach of statutory Duties
(2) For the purposes of any such proceedings, an act or omission of the authority does not constitute a breach of statutory duty unless the act or omission was in the circumstances so unreasonable that no authority having the functions of the authority in question could properly consider the act or omission to be a reasonable exercise of its function.
43A Proceedings against public or other authorities for the exercise of special statutory powers
(3) For the purposes of any such proceedings, any act or omission involving an exercise of, or failure to exercise, a special statutory power does not give rise to civil liability unless the act or omission was in the circumstances so unreasonable that no authority having the special statutory power in question could properly consider the act or omission to be a reasonable exercise of, or failure to exercise, its power.

District Court Decision

The primary judge, Puckeridge DJC, found that the plaintiff had been struck on the head by a branch or piece of bark from the tree, but was unable to find whether the branch was live timber or deadwood.

As regards the claim against the Council, the primary judge accepted the evidence of Mr Khemananta that through him the Council considered the application made to it by the Housing Corporation in accordance with Council policy and in particular DCP 43, and held that Mr Khemananta's decision involved policy considerations and discretionary judgment, and was not satisfied that any alleged failure by Mr Khemananta to consider broader social implications was unreasonable.

As regards the claim against the Housing Corporation, the primary judge was not satisfied that the tree was not properly pruned in June 2005 and was not otherwise satisfied that the Housing Corporation had been negligent to the plaintiff in any way.

Both the defendants accordingly succeeded and the plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeal.

Court of Appeal Decision

In relation to the factual findings made by the primary judge, Hodgson JA, who wrote the leading judgment for the unanimous court, was satisfied that the primary judge erred in concluding that the plaintiff may have been struck by a piece of bark, finding that "this conclusion had no support in the evidence", and found that the evidence did justify a conclusion that the plaintiff was struck by a substantial branch from the tree. However, Hodgson JA was unable to conclude that the primary judge erred in not being satisfied that the branch was deadwood (noting the plaintiff's failure to call her son who could have given evidence in this regard). Hodgson JA also agreed with the primary judge that there was no basis for a finding that the tree was improperly pruned in June 2005.

In relation to the negligence of the Council, Hodgson JA accepted the plaintiff's argument that, pursuant to s 5B of the Civil Liability Act, the tree posed a risk of damage to persons from twigs and branches dropping from it, which could be considered a not insignificant risk. However, Hodgson JA also found that in relation to a healthy tree of this kind, the risk was not shown to be such that a reasonable person would have authorised removal of the tree. Hodgson JA specifically noted:

"In circumstances where the maintenance of such trees is considered to have social utility, in my opinion it was not shown to be unreasonable for the Council to have adopted DCP 43; and it was not shown that the decision by Mr Khemananta in application of DCP 43 not to authorise removal of the tree was unreasonable."

Hodgson JA also found that the Council was not shown to have done anything that no Council could consider to be a reasonable exercise of its functions or powers, within the meaning of ss 43 and 43A of the Civil Liability Act.

In relation to the claim against the Housing Corporation, Hodgson JA noted that the Housing Corporation owed to the plaintiff a duty of care as explained by the High Court in Jones v Bartlett2. Hodgson JA held that a reasonable lessor in the position of the Housing Corporation would have used reasonable care to ensure that the Council had all the information it had that was relevant to the Council's assessment of whether consent should be given for the removal of the tree. In Hodgson JA's opinion it was appropriate for the Court to conclude that a reasonable lessor would have provided that information to the Council and that in failing to do so the Housing Corporation breached its duty of care by failing to properly set out the history of the issues with the tree as provided by the plaintiff and his neighbour.

Hodgson JA noted that in order to succeed the plaintiff must also demonstrate causation, and that in order to do so the plaintiff had to demonstrate that, had Mr Khemananta been given the history of damage and injury caused by the tree, and had his attention appropriately drawn to safety issues, he would have given consent to removing the tree. In dismissing this argument, Hodgson JA noted that the evidence showed that the tree was, of its type, a sound and healthy tree, and that any risk that it posed was no different from that posed by any tree of a similar nature placed in situations in the vicinity of property and frequented by persons. Furthermore, it was never put to Mr Khemananta that, had he known of the history of the tree, his decision would have been different, and that in fact "the general tenor of his evidence strongly indicates that it would not have been". Hodgson JA found that had Mr Khemananta been properly advised of all the history of the issues with the tree, then he still would have likely only recommended the crown thinning of the tree by 15%.

In the circumstances, although the Housing Corporation was found to be negligent, it could not be held that their negligence was causative of the plaintiff's injuries as it was not shown that the Council would have come to any different decision with a complete history of the issues with the tree, and without Council consent the tree could not lawfully be removed.

For the above reasons the plaintiff's appeal was dismissed.


Whilst this decision turned primarily on its facts, it does provide a good example that it is difficult to succeed in a claim in negligence against public authorities such as Councils unless it can be shown that the act or omission was in the circumstances so unreasonable that no authority having the functions of the authority in question could properly consider the act or omission to be a reasonable exercise of its function.

The decision also provides a reminder that plaintiffs must always establish causation in order to succeed in a claim in negligence. Demonstrating breach is only one step in the process. A plaintiff must always prove that any breach is causative of the loss claimed, which is often difficult as shown in this decision.

1. Hodgson JA, Macfarlan JA and Handley AJA

2. [2000] HCA 56

Ranked No 1 - Australia's fastest growing law firm' (Legal Partnership Survey, The Australian July 2010)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.