Australia: Where An Expression Of Interest Has Been Accepted, Failure To Disclose Negotiations With A Third Party May Amount To Misleading Or Deceptive Conduct - Section 42 Of The Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW)

Curwoods Case Note
Last Updated: 3 August 2010
Article by Sally Wooderson and Michael Mitchell

Judgment date: 2 July 2010

Fabcot Pty Ltd v Port Macquarie-Hastings Council [2010] NSWSC 726

Supreme Court of New South Wales1

In Brief

  • The Court found that a municipal council's deliberate failure to disclose that negotiations were no longer exclusive amounted to misleading or deceptive conduct within the meaning of section 42 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW), in circumstances where it had accepted an Expression of Interest from the plaintiff
  • However, the plaintiffs' claim failed as it was unable to show, based on objective evidence and history of behaviour, that it would have acted differently had it known that the negotiations were no longer exclusive.


This dispute concerned a supermarket development site ("the Land") in regional New South Wales. The plaintiffs (collectively "Woolworths") and the second defendant ("Coles") are major Australian supermarket operators. The first defendant ("the Council") is the municipal council and Development Consent Authority for the Port Macquarie-Hastings Shire. It acquired the Land before 1988 and used it as a car park.

In November 2007 the Council publicly invited Expressions of Interest in purchasing and developing the Land. Both Woolworths and Coles responded with conditional "offers". The Woolworths offer was made subject to agreement being reached and a contract entered into, and approval being given by the board of Woolworths. On 21 January 2008, the Council accepted Woolworths "offer" subject to a number of conditions, including that contractual negotiations were completed by 30 June 2008. In fact, negotiations between Woolworths and the Council dragged on well after that date. The negotiations covered a plethora of issues including liability for remediation of land contamination and developer charges for connection of essential services such as water and sewerage.

In April 2009, the Council also started negotiating with Coles, but it did not inform Woolworths that it was doing this. Coles made it a condition of the negotiations that Woolworths not be informed of its involvement.

The negotiations between Woolworths and the Council reached an impasse, and on 1 July 2009 the Council sold the land to Coles.

Woolworths commenced proceedings in the Supreme Court of New South Wales against the Council and Coles, claiming for breach of contract and statutory misleading or deceptive conduct. Before the trial began, Woolworths abandoned its claims in contract (including a claim that it was entitled to contractual exclusivity in its negotiations with the Council). However it pursued a claim under section 42 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) that the Council had indulged in misleading or deceptive conduct by failing to disclose to Woolworths that it had commenced negotiations with Coles2.

Woolworths claimed damages on the basis that, had the Council disclosed to it that it was negotiating with its major competitor, it would have abandoned many of its negotiating positions in order to secure the land against its rival.

The matter came before Hammerschlag J who considered the following issues:

1. Did the Council engaged in conduct which was misleading or deceptive?

Section 42(1) of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) provides: "A person shall not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive".

There was no issue that the Council deliberately refrained from revealing to Woolworths that it was negotiating with a third party, which in turn meant that it was no longer negotiating exclusively with Woolworths.

Hammerschlag J framed the issue in this way: In the particular circumstances of this case, did Woolworths have a reasonable expectation that the Council would inform it, if the Council decided to no longer deal exclusively with Woolworths and negotiate with a third party?

The Council argued that being "gazumped" was a well-known hazard in negotiations for purchase of land, that it had never stated to Woolworths that it was negotiating exclusively with it, and Woolworths had never enquired of the Council whether it was dealing with another party.

Hammerschlag J noted that the process of inviting Expressions of Interest entailed an initial selection of only one candidate for negotiation. The Council had informed Woolworths by letter that its offer had been accepted subject to conditions, which created an expectation on Woolworths' part that the Council would be negotiating only with the successful nominee. This was in circumstances where both parties realised that Woolworths would now spend significant time and money in order to realise the opportunity granted to it.

Furthermore, the evidence showed that the Council was well aware that Woolworths believed that it was negotiating exclusively with the Council, and that knowledge that this was not so would have been material to Woolworths.

Whilst the Council relied on the fact that one of the conditions of approval had been that negotiations would be complete by 30 June 2008, his Honour saw little significance in the fact that negotiations had in fact continued well beyond this date, as the basis of those negotiations had not changed.

It was also material that the Council admitted having given confidential information which Woolworths disclosed during the negotiations to Coles. Relevant Council officers were not called to give evidence or explain why the Council acted in the way that it did.

Hammerschlag J therefore found that the deliberate silence by the Council as to the fact that its negotiations with Woolworths had ceased to be exclusive, was in the circumstances misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive and a contravention of s 42(1) of the fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW).

2. Did Woolworths suffer any loss by the conduct complained of?

However, Hammerschlag J did not accept that Woolworths would have changed its position and made concessions to secure the contract, even if it had been made aware that the Council was no longer negotiating exclusively with it.

A number of factors led to this conclusion:

  • During negotiations with the Council, representatives of Woolworths had repeatedly threatened to walk away on the basis that certain conditions were "deal breakers". Woolworths argued at trial that these threats were insincere at the time, but his Honour did not accept this;
  • Woolworths' senior Development Manager had stated in an affidavit that had he known that the land was not going to be sold to Woolworths he would have followed an alternative strategy to build stores on other land in the area. This was put forward in support of Woolworths' original claim in contract, but was not consistent with the proposition that Woolworths would have conceded to the Council's demands in order to secure the contract at any cost;
  • During negotiations, Woolworths had written a letter to the Council stating that it could not "afford to absorb a further $470,000 in developer contributions on the project". It was inconsistent of Woolworths to now argue that if it had known about Coles' involvement it would have dropped this objection, when there appeared to be an objective financial reason for it not to do so;
  • There was other evidence to indicate that Woolworths was genuinely troubled by the Council's position on a number of negotiating points and would not necessarily have proceeded with the purchase even if it had known of Coles' involvement.

The onus lay on Woolworths to satisfy the court that it would have changed its position if it had known that the Council had begun to negotiate with Coles. It had not discharged this onus. Accordingly, its claim failed.


The case turns on its own facts, but is nevertheless a useful indicator of the way in which a court will view a situation that frequently arises during commercial negotiations.

The inviting of Expressions of Interest may not usually lead to contractual liability, but it is clear that section 42 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) (and related legislation such as section 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)) requires that parties to Expressions of Interest and tenders act fairly and reasonably towards each other.

The process of selecting an Expression of Interest is likely to carry an implication that negotiations thereafter are conducted on an exclusive basis between the two parties. Therefore, if the initiating party wishes to commence negotiating with a third party, it would be well advised to state the position clearly and unambiguously to its current negotiating partner.

1 Hammerschlag J

2 Woolworths joined Coles as a second defendant on the basis that it had been knowingly concerned in the Council's contravention. The Council counterclaimed against Woolworths for committing misleading or deceptive conduct during negotiations. Neither claim nor counterclaim succeeded.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.