ARTICLE
7 June 2017

Celebrity criminals and the proceeds of crime – why crime never pays

S
Stacks Law Firm

Contributor

Stacks Law Firm is a leading Australian legal service provider with more than 250 people operating locally in many Australian communities. We are committed to supporting the legal needs of everyday Australians and businesses across every stage of life.
Celebrity criminals may be offered huge amounts of money to tell their story, but they can't profit from their crime.
Australia Criminal Law
Stacks Law Firm are most popular:
  • within Real Estate and Construction, Privacy, Food, Drugs, Healthcare and Life Sciences topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
  • with readers working within the Media & Information, Property and Law Firm industries

Celebrity criminals such as Schapelle Corby may be offered huge amounts of money to tell their story in a TV show or book, but the law forbids them to profit from their crime.

Under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, if Corby or any other criminal derives any benefits that are associated with their crime, such as payment for a tell-all interview, film or book, authorities can step in to seize the income.

However, the benefits don't have to be in cash. They can be in any form that results in some commercial benefit flowing back to the criminal from the proceeds of crime.

Confiscation of "tainted property" used to commit a serious offence

Seizure of profits from a crime doesn't have to wait until a conviction. Some confiscation orders can be imposed on property deemed to have been used to commit a serious offence – such as a car used to carry drugs – called "tainted property" in law.

In 2006 Corby co-wrote a book, My Story, giving an account of her life in Bali's Kerobokan prison. The publisher paid the family around $270,000 for the book and an article published in New Idea magazine.

Director of Public Prosecutions recovers significant sum following court battle

However, the Commonwealth stepped in and after a lengthy court battle recovered $128,000 from Corby as the amount she was deemed to have benefited from the sale of her story to the publisher and media outlet. Her family members, who have not been charged with any crime, were allowed to keep their share of the money.

In the first case of its kind in Australia, the Director of Public Prosecutions successfully argued that Schapelle Corby had personally benefited from the deal and almost half the payment had flowed to her. (See Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Corby [2007] QCA 58.) The Queensland Supreme Court also ruled that the DPP could also seize any future payments made to her sister by the book's publisher.

It's okay to tell but not to sell

Schapelle Corby is now free and certainly has the right to tell her story, just not the right to sell it, or at least have the benefits of her crime flow directly to her. Under the federal law covering proceeds of crime, confiscated money goes into consolidated revenue.

Nathan Luke
Criminal law
Stacks Law Firm

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More