NB. This article is not published yet. Please try again later.
More Popular Related Articles on Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-structuring from USA
Section 546(e) provides that pre-bankruptcy transfers made by or to, among other entities, a "financial institution" may not be avoided as a fraudulent transfer...
Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren S.C.
In bankruptcy preference litigation, timing issues are crucial. Was a pre-bankruptcy payment made inside or outside of the 90‑day preference period?
On July 26, 2016, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that the Bankruptcy Code section 546(e) "safe harbor" applicable to constructive fraudulent transfers . . .
Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
The multimillion-dollar answer of who owns the rights to unfinished business when law firms fail rests with the California Supreme Court.
Pre-bankruptcy waivers of the automatic stay, however, are sometimes enforceable.
Troutman Sanders LLP
The Seventh Circuit rendered an opinion in FTI Consulting, Inc. v. Merit Management Group, LP,1 holding that a transfer is not protected by the safe harbor provision of section 546(e)...
Bankruptcy judge Brendan L. Shannon granted summary judgment in favor of Ritchie on the "unreasonably small capital" issue.
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Lehman was party to numerous synthetic CDO transactions, whereby Lehman entered into swap agreements with special purpose vehicles that, in turn, issued notes to various classes of noteholders.