Worldwide: Jones Day Global Privacy & Cybersecurity Update | Vol. 21

Jones Day Cybersecurity, Privacy & Data Protection Attorney Spotlight: Edward S. Chang

Data privacy- and security-related class actions appear to be on the rise, and effectively defending them requires the right mix of substantive and procedural knowledge. Edward Chang is a partner based in Irvine, California, and, for nearly 15 years, has represented institutional clients in a wide array of complex litigation matters, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, privacy, and consumer issues. He has served as lead counsel in hundreds of class and individual actions, complicated business disputes, and regulatory investigations, including bet-the-company matters.

As a leader in Jones Day's cybersecurity practice in California, Ed advises clients on their most sensitive business and cybersecurity issues. He advises industry leaders on a variety of cyber and privacy matters, including industry standards, cybersecurity management, data governance, third-party management, product liability risk, licensing, and regulatory and litigation risks. Ed also advises clients on data-breach response and data-breach class actions filed in state and federal courts across the country, including working on a team handling more than 47 nationwide data-breach class actions in one of the largest data-breach matters in U.S. history.

UNITED STATES

Regulatory—Policy, Best Practices, and Standards

NIST Evaluates Advances in Face Recognition Software

On November 30, 2018, the National Institute of Standards and Technology ("NIST") published a report evaluating the accuracy of facial recognition software. NIST's study found that between 2014 and 2018, facial recognition software became 20 times better at searching databases to find matching photographs. The evaluation used 127 software algorithms from 39 different developers, which represent the bulk of the industry.

NIST Proposes Steps to Modernize Technology Transfer and Innovation

On December 6, 2018, NIST released a draft green paper with proposed steps to modernize the transfer and commercialization of technology developed through federally funded research and development initiatives. The proposals include updating legal tools for the transfer of technology, such as intellectual property rights for the licensing and commercial development of federal research. The draft green paper includes input from federal stakeholders, such as the National Science and Technology Council's Lab-to-Market Subcommittee, as well as public comments.

Regulatory—Consumer and Retail

FTC Releases Do Not Call Registry Data for Fiscal Year 2018

On December 6, 2018, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") released the National Do Not Call Registry Data Book for Fiscal Year 2018, along with state-by-state analyses of the data. The number of registrants with the Do Not Call list has increased significantly, while the number of complaints has decreased and the most prevalent types of calls have changed.

FTC Holds Hearings on Data Security

On December 11-12, 2018, the FTC held hearings on data security as part of its examination of consumer protection in the 21st century. The hearings included discussions on incentives to invest in data security, consumer demand for data security, data security assessments, a U.S. consumer framework for data security, and the FTC's data security enforcement program. Video recordings and transcripts of the hearing are available on the FTC website.

Retailer Discloses Cybersecurity Attack

On December 21, 2018, a retailer  disclosed that it was the victim of a cybersecurity attack involving suspicious log-in activity. The retailer planned to notify all customers whose usernames and passwords may have been used to access their accounts, even though there was no indication that the usernames and passwords used in the log-in attempts were obtained from its systems, or that any personal information stored on its customers' accounts were obtained.

Hotel Discloses Approximately 383 Million Records Affected in 2018 Breach

On January 4, a hotel chain disclosed that up to 383 million guest records were compromised in a breach of its reservation database that began in 2014. This is an increase from the figure reported when the company first announced the existence of the breach on November 30, 2018. The hackers accessed names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, and passport numbers stored in the reservation database. The incident affected approximately 8.6 million encrypted payment card numbers, 5.25 million unencrypted passport numbers, and 20.3 million encrypted passport numbers.

Regulatory—Financial

FTC Seeks Comments on Identity Theft Detection Requirements

On December 4, 2018, the FTC announced that it is seeking comments on whether it should change rules that currently require financial institutions and creditors to take steps to detect signs of identity theft affecting customers. The FTC is seeking comments on the costs these rules impose on consumers and businesses, whether there is a continuing need for the rules, and whether to expand the types of creditors covered by the rules.

SEC Office of Compliance and Examinations to Focus on Cybersecurity

On December 20, 2018, the SEC's Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations ("OCIE") announced its 2019 examination priorities, which include a focus on cybersecurity and digital assets. The SEC reiterated that all OCIE examination programs "will prioritize cybersecurity with an emphasis on, among other things, proper configuration of network storage devices, information security governance, and policies and procedures related to retail trading information security."

Regulatory—Energy/Utilities

DOE Announces Cyber Threats Targeting Cloud Services Providers

On December 20, 2018, the United States Department of Energy ("DOE")  announced that a Chinese cyber group is engaging in cyber-enabled theft targeting global managed service providers, cloud service providers, and their clients. The DOE stated that the group operated on behalf of the Chinese Ministry of State Security and used a mix of sophisticated custom malware and off-the-shelf applications to compromise multiple service and cloud providers. The group targeted information from critical infrastructure companies in the areas of information technology, energy, health care, communications, and critical manufacturing.

DOE Announces $40 Million Grid Modernization Initiative

On January 24, the DOE announced a $40 million initiative in Fiscal Year 2019 for its Grid Modernization Initiative. The initiative aims to work with public and private partners to develop tools and technologies for a modern "grid of the future" that is resilient, reliable, and secure. The initiative will leverage subject matter expertise across national laboratories, including on the topics of cybersecurity, resilience modeling, advanced sensors, and energy storage. Additional details are expected to be released by March.

Regulatory—Transportation

Pennsylvania Criminalizes Drone Misuse

On January 12, Pennsylvania's law imposing criminal penalties for unlawful use of drones went into effect. The new law prohibits the use of drones to intentionally or knowingly conduct surveillance of another in a private space, or the operation of a drone in a manner that places another person in reasonable fear of bodily injury. The law permits a $300 fine for violations.

Regulatory—Health Care/HIPAA

HHS Releases New Health Industry Cybersecurity Practices

On December 28, 2018, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") released the publication of "Health Industry Cybersecurity Practices (HICP): Managing Threats and Protecting Patients." The publication suggests voluntary cybersecurity practices, resources, and templates for small, medium, and large health care organizations. The publication is the result of a two-year industry-led effort in response to Section 405(d) of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 mandating the development of practice guidelines to reduce cybersecurity risks for the health care industry.

HHS Seeks Public Input on Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy Rule

On December 12, 2018, HHS issued a Request for Information seeking public input on how the HIPAA Privacy Rule could be modified to further the goal of protecting the privacy and security of individuals' health information while permitting information-sharing needed for important purposes, such as coordination of treatment and care.

Regulatory—Defense and National Security

Secretaries Issue Joint Statement on Chinese Cyber Attacks

On December 20, 2018, the Secretary of State and Secretary of Homeland issued a joint statement regarding hacks on managed service and cloud service providers by actors linked to the Chinese Ministry of State Security. The statement expressed concern that these hacks may have violated commitments made by China in 2015 to refrain from conducting or knowingly supporting "cyber-enabled theft of intellectual property, including trade secrets or other confidential business information, with the intent of providing competitive advantages to companies or commercial sectors."

Director of National Intelligence Unveils National Intelligence Strategy

On January 24, the Director of National Intelligence unveiled the National Intelligence Strategy, a quadrennial publication that sets intelligence strategy for the next four years. The strategy calls attention to cyber and space as new domains of warfare. In particular, the strategy notes that the relatively low cost of cyber operations and lack of attribution makes the cyber domain attractive to smaller nations, terror groups, transnational criminal networks, and individuals. The strategy also calls for the United States to be at the forefront of research on artificial intelligence, advanced automation, and nanotechnology.

Litigation, Judicial Rulings, and Agency Enforcement Actions

Hotel Chain Faces Multimillion-Dollar Data Breach Class Action

On December 1, 2018, an individual filed a putative class action complaint in New York federal court against a hotel chain alleging violations of federal securities laws related to a massive data breach that potentially affected up to 500 million hotel guests. The complaint alleges that the company made materially false and misleading statements in SEC filings regarding the security of customer data. The company seeks to combine this case with other class actions filed throughout the United States.

District of Columbia Sues Social Media Company Over Data Harvesting

On December 19, 2018, the Attorney General for the District of Columbia sued a social media company for violations of the District's Consumer Protection Procedures Act in relation to the harvesting of user data by a third-party application developer who sold the data to a political consulting firm. The complaint alleges that the company engaged in unfair and deceptive trade practices for allegedly failing to inform consumers that their personal information may be shared with third-party applications without their knowledge or consent.

Airline Reaches $2.3M Settlement to End Worker Background Check Class Action

On January 3, an airline agreed to pay $2.3 million to settle a proposed class action brought on behalf of about 44,100 job applicants that claimed the company disregarded federal and California law by including extraneous and misleading information in notifications to prospective employees about background checks, and did not make standalone disclosures in compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

SEC Charges Hackers of EDGAR System

On January 15, the SEC announced charges against nine defendants for hacking into the SEC's EDGAR system and extracting nonpublic information. The SEC's complaint alleges that the hackers gained access to EDGAR in 2016 and extracted files containing nonpublic earnings results, and used the information to make trades and earn at least $4.1 million in illegal profits.

Illinois Supreme Court Issues Highly Anticipated BIPA Decision

On January 25, the Illinois Supreme Court unanimously held that a person has standing to sue under the Biometric Information Privacy Act ("BIPA") without alleging a separate, real-world harm. BIPA imposes requirements on companies that collect and handle biometric identifiers of Illinois residents, such as notice and consent requirements. BIPA permits an "aggrieved" person to sue for violations of the statute, and the Illinois Supreme Court determined that a plaintiff is "aggrieved" when the individual's rights have been infringed, without the need to plead an actual injury or adverse effect beyond a technical violation of the statute. For more information, please see our Jones Day Alert.

LEGISLATIVE—FEDERAL

Senator Calls for Data Minimization Laws

On November 30, 2018, U.S. Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) issued a press release calling for national data privacy legislation to safeguard consumer information. The announcement called for data minimization and retention requirements to limit how much sensitive information companies collect and retain about consumers. The announcement also called for the legislation to hold companies accountable for security costs.

LEGISLATIVE—STATES

Additional States Propose Bills with CCPA-Like Provisions

Since January 1, a number of states have introduced bills modeled at least in part on California's Consumer Privacy Act ("CCPA") and borrow many of the same provisions, such as requiring companies to provide notice of the types of personal information they collect and the categories of third parties to whom they disclose personal information. The bills also would grant individuals certain rights, such as the right to request access to their personal information and the right to opt-out of the sale of personal information. Washington's bill goes further and proposes requirements closer to the European Union's GDPR, such as defining roles for controllers and processors and imposing a requirement to correct inaccurate information. Most of these bills have been referred to committees and are under consideration (except for the Mississippi bill, which died in committee on February 5). For more information, please see our Jones Day Alert.

  • On January 2, SB 176 was introduced in New Mexico.
  • On January 9, S00224 was introduced in New York.
  • On January 12, SD 341 was introduced in Massachusetts.
  • On January 14, HB 1485 was introduced in North Dakota.
  • On January 18, SB 418 was introduced in Hawaii.
  • On January 25, HB 1253 was introduced in Mississippi.
  • On January 30, SB 5376 was introduced in Washington.
  • On January 31, S0234 was introduced in Rhode Island.
  • On February 4, SB0613 was introduced in Maryland.

South Carolina Enacts Insurance Data Security Act

On January 1, South Carolina enacted a breach notification and information security law for insurers, agents, and other licensed entities authorized to operate under the state's insurance laws. The South Carolina Insurance Data Security Act is based on the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' Insurance Data Security Model Law and includes stringent requirements for investigating and disclosing certain cybersecurity events within 72 hours of discovery.

Vermont Regulates Data Brokers

On January 1, Vermont passed a law to regulate data brokers that collect and sell personal information about consumers. The law requires data brokers to register with the Secretary of State, provide information about the broker's opt-out policies, maintain a written information security program, and make certain disclosures to consumers. Vermont passed the law in response to reported risks associated with the widespread aggregation and sale of data about consumers.

Massachusetts Amends Data Breach Notification Law

On January 10, the Governor of Massachusetts signed legislation to amend Massachusetts' data breach notification law to require the sharing of additional information with state regulators, among other changes. Entities must provide information about the nature of the breach, the number of affected state residents, the identity of the person responsible for the breach, and a description of the information compromised. Companies also must disclose whether they have a written information security program and the steps taken after the data breach. The new law goes into effect on April 11.

CANADA

Canadian Health Department Seeks Comment on Medical Device Cybersecurity Guidance

On December 7, 2018, Health Canada  published draft guidance on cybersecurity for medical devices. The guidance recommended the incorporation of cybersecurity into the design of the device and across the device's lifecycle, and recommended that manufacturers engage in post-market monitoring to identify and address evolving vulnerabilities. Health Canada requested comments from across the industry on the "technical considerations related to cybersecurity of medical devices and the submission requirements for a medical device license."

The following Jones Day lawyers contributed to this section: Kaeley Brown, Shirley Chan, Jeremy Close, Meredith Collier, Jennifer Everett, Levent Hergüner, Jay Johnson, Christopher Markham, Mallory McKenzie, Mary Alexander Myers, Nicole Perry, and Kerianne Tobitsch.

LATIN AMERICA

Argentina

Agency Approves Guidelines for Binding Corporate Rules

On December 7, 2018, the Access to Public Information Agency (Agencia de Acceso a la Información Públicaissued through an official communication the Guidelines and Basic Contents of Binding Corporate Rules (Lineamientos y Contenidos Básicos de Normas Corporativas Vinculantes), which provides guiding principles of self-regulation standards for personal data protection among entities from the same group of companies (source documents in Spanish). The guidelines allow companies to prove before the Agency that international data transfers are secure and have an adequate level of protection, especially when the recipient country does not have the same security standards for personal data.

BRAZIL

Federal District Attorney's Office Investigates Hotel Data Breach

On December 3, 2018, the Federal District Attorney's Office in Brasília (Ministério Público do Distrito Federal e Territórios), through its Special Unit for Data Protection and Artificial Intelligence, started an investigation into the potential leak of Brazilians' personal data stored in the servers of an international hotel chain. The breach potentially exposed the personal data of up to 500 million guests worldwide, including personal information such as full name, passport number, mailing address, email, phone number, date of birth, arrival and departure dates, and, in some cases, credit card information.

Brazil Creates National Data Protection Authority

On December 27, 2018, the former Brazilian President signed Executive Order No. 869/2018, which established the Brazilian National Data Protection Authority (Agência Nacional de Proteção de Dados, or "ANPD") (source document in Portuguese). Brazil created the ANPD pursuant to the Brazilian General Data Protection Law (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais). The ANPD will regulate data protection issues, oversee persons subject to the Brazilian General Data Protection Law, and enforce penalties for data protection violations.

CHILE

Ministry Announces Cybersecurity Campaign

On December 28, 2018, the Ministry of the Interior and Public Security (Ministerio del Interior y Seguridad Publicaannounced a cybersecurity campaign to promote protection of individuals' rights in digital environments (source document in Spanish). As part of the campaign, the Ministry issued recommendations for safely navigating the internet, posting on social networks, and using online security settings. The Ministry also issued guidance regarding the sharing of personal information online (source document in Spanish).

COSTA RICA

Costa Rica Hosts the Ibero-American Meeting of Data Protection

On December 4, 2018, the Inhabitants Data Protection Agency (Agencia de Protección de Datos de los Habitantes, or "PRODHAB") issued an official communication stating that Costa Rica hosted the sixth Ibero-American Data Protection Meeting (Encuentro Iberoamericano de Protección de Datos) (source document in Spanish). Experts across the Latin American region came together to discuss actions to protect the security and privacy of personal data. The government's announcement highlighted the takeaways from the meeting, including the need create a data protection culture, update compliance models, and invest in privacy.

MEXICO

Data Protection Agency Resolves More Than 10,000 Appeals in 2018

On December 30, 2018, the National Institute for Transparency, Access to Information, and Personal Data Protection (Instituto Nacional de Acceso a la Información y Protección de Datos Personalesannounced that, between January and November 2018, it had resolved 10,745 appeals related to data protection and access to information (source document in Spanish). Among these appeals, 9,485 (approximately 88%) related to the right to access information, and 1,260 (approximately 12%) related to personal data protection.

Data Protection Agency Hosts International Personal Data Protection Day

On January 28, the Instituto Nacional de Acceso a la Información y Protección de Datos Personales hosted the International Personal Data Protection Day to discuss significant and controversial issues regarding personal data (source document in Spanish). The topics of discussion included: (i) the personal data protection rights of legal entities and (ii) the legal requirement to obtain a judicial order to use geolocation services to locate possible criminals in Mexico.

PERU

Peru Fines Entities More Than US$230M in 2018 for Privacy Violations

On January 1, the Peruvian National Authority of Data Protection (Autoridad Nacional de Protección de Datosannounced that it fined several public and private entities throughout 2018 for violations of the Peruvian Data Privacy Law (source document in Spanish). Peruvian authorities found that these entities should have implemented security measures for the protection of personal data, such as security protocols for access, privileged data management, and periodic review of privileges, among other measures.

URUGUAY

Agency Modifies Data Protection Law

On January 28, the Regulatory and Personal Data Control Unit (Unidad Reguladora y de Control de Datos Personalesannounced modifications to the Law of Accountability N°19.670 (Ley de Rendición de Cuentas N°19.670) (source documents in Spanish). These modifications include extending the law's application to the processing of personal data outside of Uruguayan territory in certain circumstances, requiring that entities provide notice of security breaches to data owners and implement remediation steps, and requiring entities that process personal data on a regular basis to designate a data protection official.

The following Jones Day lawyers contributed to this section: Guillermo Larrea, Daniel D'Agostini, and Juan Carlos Quinzaños.

EUROPE

European Council

European Council Publishes New Electronic Communications Code

On December 4, 2018, the European Council adopted the European Electronic Communication Code ("EEOC"), which it published in the Official Journal on December 17, 2018. The EEOC expands the ePrivacy Directive to regulate over-the-top (or OTT) communications services, such as instant messages and email, and to promote the rollout of high-capacity networks, such as 5G and fiber networks. Each EU member state has two years to enact national implementing legislation for the EEOC.

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE

Advocate General Makes Recommendation in Case Involving Third-Party Plugin

On December 19, 2018, Advocate General Bobek recommended to the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") that when a website operator embeds a third-party plugin into its website that collects and transmits a user's personal data, both the website operator and the third party should be considered joint controllers. This recommendation is limited to circumstances in which both parties co-determine the means and processing of data, but not preceding or subsequent stages of processing. The Advocate General made this recommendation in the context of a case before the ECJ involving a fashion company that embedded on its website a "Like" button from a third-party social media platform.

Advocate General Makes Recommendation on De-Referencing of Sensitive Data

On January 10, Advocate General Szpunar recommended to the ECJ that when the operator of a search engine receives a request to de-reference links displaying sensitive data, the operator must accede to the request as a matter of course. If the issue of the derogation of freedom of expression arises, the Advocate General recommends that the operator balance data protection and respect for private life with the right of the public to access the information and the right to freedom of expression. The Advocate General made this recommendation in the context of a case before the ECJ involving a request by individuals to de-reference a webpage that contained sensitive information and satirized government officials.

Advocate General Recommends that "Right To Be Forgotten" Not Apply to Search Engines Beyond EU Borders

On January 10, Advocate General Szpunar recommended that the ECJ limit the application of the "right to be forgotten" to the territory of the European Union. The Advocate General recommended that a search engine operator responding to a request for de-referencing should not be required to de-reference search results on domains outside of EU borders, although he did not rule out the possibility that there may be some circumstances where de-referencing should occur at a worldwide level. The Advocate General also recommended that search engines must implement all possible measures, including geo-blocking, to enforce effective de-referencing for all IP addresses located in the European Union, regardless of the domain. The Advocate General made this recommendation in the context of a case before the ECJ involving a search engine operator that refused to comply with a demand by the French Data Protection Authority to conduct de-referencing on all of its domain name extensions regardless of location.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EU Negotiators Reach Agreement on Cybersecurity Act

On December 10, 2018, the European Parliament, the EU Council, and the European Commission reached a political agreement on the Cybersecurity Act, which was first introduced by the European Commission on September 13, 2017. The agreement creates the first EU-wide certification scheme to ensure that products and services sold in EU countries meet certain cybersecurity standards. The agreement also upgrades the European Union Agency for Network and Information and Security ("ENISA") with a permanent grant to coordinate responses to cybersecurity attacks among EU member states and assist EU institutions in developing cybersecurity policies. The new regulation must be formally approved by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.

EUROPEAN DATA PROTECTION BOARD

EDPB Adopts Revised Guidelines on Accreditation

On December 4, 2018, the European Data Protection Board ("EDPB") adopted revised guidelines on accreditation of certification bodies under Article 43 of the GDPR, including a new annex. The document provides guidance on how to interpret and implement Article 43, which requires member states to ensure that certification bodies, which issue certification under Article 42(1) of the GDPR, are accredited by either or both the competent supervisory authority or the national accreditation body. The annex will be subject to public consultation.

EDPB Adopts Opinion on EU-Japan Draft Adequacy Decision

On December 5, 2018, the EDPB published an opinion regarding the European Commission's draft decision on the adequate protection of personal data by Japan. The EDPB noted the areas of convergence between the legal frameworks of each region but noted several remaining concerns, such as monitoring of compliance, the need to protect personal data transferred from the European Union to Japan throughout the entire data lifecycle, and access by public authorities to data transferred to Japan.

BELGIUM

Belgian DPA Publishes GDPR Activity Review

On November 23, 2018, the Belgian Data Protection Authority ("DPA") published a six-month review of its activities since the GDPR came into effect on May 25, 2018 (source document in French and in Dutch). The review assesses the impact of the GDPR, including the structural changes made to the former Belgian Privacy Commission to accommodate increased demand. Since the GDPR took effect, the Belgian DPA has received 317 reports of data breaches, 3,599 requests for information, and 148 complaints.

Belgium Adopts Law Reforming Belgian Privacy Commission

On January 10, the Law of December 3, 2017, creating the Data Protection Authority, was published in the Belgian Official Gazette (source documents in French and in Dutch). The law aims at reforming the Belgian Privacy Commission, originally established by the Law of December 8, 1992, implementing Directive 95/46/EC, and replaces the Belgian Privacy Commission with the Belgian DPA. The main purpose of the new law is to provide the Belgian DPA with more powers to fulfill its tasks under the GDPR.

Belgian DPA Publishes Prior Consultation Form in Context of DPIAs

In January, the Belgian DPA published a form to be completed for prior consultation in the context of a data protection impact assessment ("DPIA") under Article 35 of the GDPR (source document in French and in Dutch). The form includes questions regarding details of the processing activity and how to manage risks associated with the processing activity.

Belgian DPA Issues Legal Note Defining Roles of Controllers and Processors

In January, the Belgian DPA published guidance on the role of a data controller versus data processor (source documents in French and Dutch). The guidance sets out the basic principles, definitions, and criteria to help entities identify their status as a controller or processor, as well as the data protection responsibilities of entities in each role.

FRANCE

CNIL Warns about Privacy Risks from Internet-Connected Toys

On December 3, 2018, the French Data Protection Authority ("CNIL") published an article about the privacy risks that can arise from the use of internet-connected toys (source document in French). The CNIL warned about the types of data processing activities that may be carried out through internet-connected toys, such as targeted advertising directed to children. The CNIL provided guidance to customers on how to secure these toys.

CNIL Issues Guidance on Consent to Data Sharing

On December 28, 2018, the CNIL published guidance on the sharing of personal data with business partners (source document in French). The CNIL stated that companies must inform data subjects of the identity of their business partners and obtain consent before sharing any personal data with their partners. The recipient of the personal data must obtain new consent from the data subject before sharing it with additional business partners.

CNIL Publishes Booklet on Digital Interfaces

On January 18, the CNIL's Digital Innovation Laboratory published its sixth booklet regarding best practices for the design of a digital service interface, which should incorporate privacy designs (source document in French).

CNIL Fines Internet Search Engine €50 Million

On January 21, the CNIL fined an internet search engine company up to €50 million after investigating data privacy complaints from two associations representing about 10,000 persons (source document in French). The CNIL conducted an investigation of the complaints and found two violations: the company did not provide adequate notice to users and did not have a valid legal basis to process users' personal data for targeted advertising.

CNIL Releases Guidelines for Social Workers

On January 23, the CNIL published guidelines for social workers who assist individuals in their use of online public services (source document in French). The CNIL stressed that social workers who have access to individuals' personal data while assisting them should: (i) request only information that is strictly necessary for use of the online public services; (ii) urge the individuals to delete any navigation history when disconnecting; (iii) not keep any information relating to such individuals; and (iv) request a written authorization prior to carrying out any formality on behalf of the individual.

GERMANY

Bavarian DPA to Investigate Deletion Concepts by Enterprises Using SAP Systems

In December 2018, the Data Protection Authority of Bavaria for the Private Sector ("BayLDA") announced that it will investigate larger enterprises using SAP Enterprise-Resource-Planning systems with respect to their deletion routines. The audits will focus on GDPR compliance and timely deletion of personal data. BayLDA has not yet published selection criteria for the enterprises to be audited.

ITALY

Italian DPA Verifies that Codes of Conduct Comply with GDPR

On December 24, 2018, the Italian DPA verified that Codes of Conduct issued under the pre-GDPR regime for newspaper activity, scientific and statistic research activity, and defensive investigations are consistent with the GDPR (source document in Italian). The provisions contained in the Codes of Conduct, as revised by the Italian DPA, were published in the Italian Official Gazette in January 2019 and supplement the conditions for lawful processing set forth under the GDPR and the Harmonization Decree No. 101/2018.

Italian DPA Starts Public Consultation on General Authorizations for Processing of Sensitive Data

In December 2018, the Italian DPA identified five provisions under the pre-GDPR regime for the processing of sensitive data that are compatible with the GDPR (source document in Italian). These provisions include the processing of sensitive data in the employment context, for scientific research purposes, and in other circumstances. On January 11, 2019, the DPA made these provisions available for public consultation to gather comments, observations, and proposals from all interested subjects before their final approval.

THE NETHERLANDS

DDPA Limits WiFi Tracking to Exceptional Circumstances

On November 30, 2018, the DDPA announced that companies may track people on the street, in shopping centers, or in stations via WiFi tracking or other means on their mobile devices in only a few circumstances and under strict conditions (source document in Dutch). The DDPA published a Q&A on this subject on its website.

DDPA Clarifies "Large-Scale" Processing for Health Care Providers

On December 11, 2018, the DDPA explained that it considers all processing of personal data by hospitals, doctors, and care groups to be processing of personal data on a "large scale" (source document in Dutch). All other health care providers are considered to engage in large-scale processing of personal data if they process data of more than 10,000 patients in one information system.

Banks and Insurance Companies Meet DPO Obligations After DDPA Audit

On January 14, the DDPA completed its audit of banks and insurance companies and determined that all 45 banks and 93 insurance companies have registered a data protection officer ("DPO") with the DDPA and published contact information for their DPO on their websites (source document in Dutch).

SPAIN

Spain Approves National Law Implementing GDPR

On December 5, 2018, Spain's Parliament approved the Organic Law 3/2018 for the Protection of Personal Data and the Guarantee of Digital Rights ("LOPDGDD"), which implements the GDPR in Spain. The LOPDGDD creates rules for notifying citizens about the processing of their personal data, sets the age of consent at 14 years old, provides for the right to be forgotten on social networks or similar services, and updates the right to privacy against the use of video surveillance and sound recording in the workplace.

SDPA Publishes Data Protection Officers Registry

On December 11, 2018, the Spanish Data Protection Agency ("SDPA") published the registry of DPOs. The registry contains the contact data of nearly 20,000 entities, of which approximately 3,000 correspond to the public sector and the rest to the private sector. Citizens who want to exercise their rights can find contact details of the DPO on the registry by searching by the company name or tax identification number.

SDPA Publishes Report on Processing of Personal Data Related to Political Opinions

On December 19, 2018, the SDPA published a report analyzing the processing by political parties of personal data related to political opinions. The report states that political parties, federations, coalitions, and constituencies can process political opinions only when they have been freely expressed by people in the exercise of their right to freedom of expression and their ideological freedom. The report also states that the processing must be proportional to the objective.

UNITED KINGDOM

Survey Shows Increase in Data Subject Access Requests to Medical Providers

On December 14, 2018, the British Medical Association released the results of an online survey showing a more than 30 percent increase in the number of subject access requests that UK doctors are receiving each month from patients or their representatives after implementation of the GDPR. Though doctors previously were allowed to charge a reasonable fee to cover the administrative costs of completing subject access requests, the GDPR now requires that these be free of charge unless the request is "manifestly unfounded" or "excessive." The survey also found that, on average, more than three-quarters of requests were made by companies acting on behalf of patients, such as solicitors, compared to 22 percent made by patients themselves.

Government Appoints Chair of New Geospatial Commission

On December 19, 2018, Sir Andrew Dilnot was appointed Chair of the UK Government's new Geospatial Commission. The Commission was established in 2018 to set geospatial strategy, policy, and data standards and encourage more productive use of location-linked data. Unlike the independent Information Commissioner's Office, the Geospatial Commission is part of the UK Government and sits within the Cabinet Office, the governmental body responsible for coordinating government policy.

The following Jones Day lawyers contributed to this section: Laurent De Muyter, Undine von Diemar, Olivier Haas, Jörg Hladjk, Levent Herguner, Bastiaan Kout, Jonathon Little, Martin Lotz, Hatziri Minaudier, Selma Olthof, Audrey Paquet, Sara Rizzon, Irene Robledo, Elizabeth Robertson, Lucia Stoican, Rhys Thomas, and Kerianne Tobitsch.

ASIA

HONG KONG

Privacy Commissioner Receives Notification of Data Breach

On November 28, 2018, Hong Kong's Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data ("Privacy Commissioner") received a data breach notification from a consumer credit reporting agency regarding suspected security loopholes in its application procedures for credit reports. The Privacy Commissioner initiated a compliance check, and the company took immediate remedial actions to mitigate any possible losses, including freezing the affected online accounts and notifying affected individuals.

Privacy Commissioner Releases Inspection Report on Private Tutorial Services Industry

On December 28, 2018, the Privacy Commissioner released a report with the results of its inspections of the personal data systems of companies in the private tutorial services industry. While the Commissioner found that personal data protection measures are generally acceptable in the industry, there are still some inadequacies, such as unnecessary or excessive collection of personal data, indefinite data retention, improper use of personal data, and inadequate personal data security.

JAPAN

European Commission Adopts Adequacy Decision on Japan

On January 23, the European Commission adopted its adequacy decision on Japan, which allows personal data to flow freely under adequate data protection guarantees between the two regions. The decision includes a set of rules that will bridge several differences between the two data protection systems and a complaint mechanism for Europeans regarding access to their data by Japanese public authorities. The decision went into effect on the day of adoption.

PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

Committee Releases National Standard for Health Information

On December 26, 2018, the National Information Security Standardization Technical Committee released a national standard for the handling of health information called "Information Security Technology Health and Medical Information Security Guide" ("Standard") (source document in Chinese). The Standard defines "personal health information" and requires controllers to obtain authorization from the individuals when using or disclosing their personal health information. The Standard provides measures that controllers can implement to protect personal health information, including employee training and assessment, data system management, data categorization, access control, user restrictions, and encryption.

Cyberspace Administration Approves New Rules for Blockchain Service Providers

On January 10, the Cyberspace Administration of China approved new rules for blockchain service providers called the "Provisions on the Administration of Blockchain Information Services," which will take effect on February 15 (source document in Chinese). The Provisions require blockchain service providers to register with the Cyberspace Administration of China and be subject to regular monitoring. Blockchain service providers must implement comprehensive measures, such as user registration and identity verification, and report to the government any new products, applications, or functions before launching them.

Government to Inspect Data Collection through Mobile Applications

On January 25, four government agencies announced a campaign to inspect mobile applications that obtain personal information (source documents in Chinese). Between January and December, the government will inspect mobile applications to ensure that they comply with cybersecurity laws when collecting or processing personal information. The campaign will evaluate data privacy policies on the applications and the type and amount of personal information collected through the applications. The campaign will focus on applications that have a large number of users or are closely related to users' daily life. Applications that pass the inspection will receive verification certificates, while those that fail will be referred to law enforcement.

SINGAPORE

IMDA Launches Data Protection Trustmark Certification

On January 9, the Infocomm Media Development Authority ("IMDA") announced that its Data Protection Trustmark ("DPTM") certification was available for applicants. DPTM is a voluntary enterprise-wide certification of a company's data protection policies, processes, and accountability practices that is meant to help companies build trust with consumers by demonstrating accountable data protection practices. The certification is valid for three years.

The following Jones Day lawyers contributed to this section: Michiru Takahashi, Sharon Yiu, and Grace Zhang.

AUSTRALIA

New Legislation Provides Law Enforcement Access to Communications

On December 6, 2018, Parliament  passed the Telecommunications and Other Legislation (Assistance and Access) Act 2018. The Act amended existing legislation to require designated communications providers to grant access to communications on their platforms when requested by law enforcement agencies investigating serious offenses that are punishable by a term of imprisonment of three years or more. The Australian Federal Government has agreed to consider amendments to the Act proposed by the Opposition Labour Party and industry groups in the new legislative session, so the Act may be amended in the short term.

Federal Government Introduces Consumer Data Rights Legislation

On January 13, the Australian Federal Government introduced legislation to Parliament that would establish the Consumer Data Right ("CDR"). The CDR would allow consumers to access data held by businesses about their consumption of goods and services, and would allow consumers to obtain the data directly from businesses in a standard format. If the Australian Parliament passes the legislation, the CDR will apply to the banking sector incrementally starting on July 1, 2019.

The following Jones Day lawyers contributed to this section: Adam Salter and Drew Broadfoot.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (UK) LLP
 
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centers
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (UK) LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions