United States: Top 10 International Anti-Corruption Developments For November 2018

In order to provide an overview for busy in-house counsel and compliance professionals, we summarize below some of the most important international anti-corruption developments from the past month, with links to primary resources. This month we ask:  How will new policies announced by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) affect prosecutions of individuals and cases involving China? How is one African country reacting to alleged bribery by Chinese nationals? How many FCPA-related tips did the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Office of the Whistleblower receive in Fiscal Year 2018? The answers to these questions and more are here in our November 2018 Top 10 list.

  1. DOJ Announces Revisions to the Yates Memo. On November 29, 2018, Deputy Attorney General (DAG) Rod Rosenstein announced changes to the September 2015 “Yates Memo” on individual accountability for corporate wrongdoing. Under the Yates Memo, companies seeking cooperation credit in criminal cases were required to “identify all individuals involved in or responsible for the misconduct at issue.” Under the revised policy, companies must “identify every individual who was substantially involved in or responsible for the criminal conduct.”  Although he did not expressly define “substantial involvement,” the DAG suggested that the term would include those individuals “who authorized the misconduct” or otherwise “play[ed] significant roles in setting a company on a course of criminal conduct,” as opposed to an individual in a large corporation whose “routine activities … were part of an illegal scheme” or “who are not likely to be prosecuted.” In civil cases, DOJ attorneys may now offer partial cooperation credit.  For maximum credit in a civil case, a company “must identify every individual person who was substantially involved in or responsible for the misconduct.” But a company may also receive partial cooperation credit “even if the company is either unwilling to stipulate about which non-managerial employees are culpable, or eager to resolve the case without conducting a costly investigation to identify every individual who might face civil liability in theory, but in reality would not be sued personally.” Because the purpose of these changes was to bring policy in line with actual practice—according to the DAG, the Yates Memo was not being “strictly enforced” in all cases—it is not clear that the revisions will substantially change DOJ’s approach to corporate prosecutions. Nevertheless, by relaxing the strict language of the Yates Memo, it may offer companies additional room to advocate for cooperation credit and to pursue more expeditious resolutions.
  2. DOJ Announces China Initiative. On November 1, 2018, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that he had ordered the creation of a “China Initiative” designed to identify trade theft cases and to ensure that DOJ assigns adequate resources to prosecute them and to bring them “to an appropriate conclusion quickly and effectively.” The China Initiative will be led by DOJ’s National Security Division, with the participation of several other DOJ components, including the Criminal Division, which houses the FCPA Unit. Although Attorney General Sessions did not mention the FCPA in his remarks, a Fact Sheet on the China Initiative stated that one of the Initiative’s goals is to “Identify Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) cases involving Chinese companies that compete with American businesses[.]” If this goal is carried out, it will be a break from DOJ’s usual FCPA enforcement practice. With certain exceptions, such as the pharma initiative, DOJ has pursued FCPA cases opportunistically, relying on corporate self-disclosures, whistleblowers, media articles, and similar sources to make cases as evidence becomes available. To be sure, DOJ has used information learned in one case to pursue related cases, which has sometimes resulted in a sustained focus on a particular region or industry. DOJ has also long stressed that FCPA enforcement helps level the playing field for American businesses competing in global markets. But, to our knowledge, DOJ has not previously set out to identify cases involving companies from a specific country that are competing with U.S. businesses. We will see over time how much of a break in practice the China Initiative will actually be.
  3. Third Circuit Denies Business Executive’s Appeal in FCPA Case Involving Multilateral Development Bank. On November 8, 2018, the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Dimitrij Harder’s efforts to reduce his five-year term of imprisonment for violating the FCPA.  Harder pleaded guilty in April 2016 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to two counts of violating the FCPA for allegedly bribing a senior official at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) to secure millions of dollars for development projects in Eastern Europe. In July 2017, he was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. On appeal, Harder challenged the district court’s sentencing calculations, arguing that he should have received a reduced sentence because his bribery did not cause a loss to any victim (Harder argued that the projects involved in the bribery scheme were, in fact, economically beneficial) and that his sentence created an unwarranted sentencing disparity since the average sentence for a defendant in an FCPA case over the past ten years was 13 months’ imprisonment, while one third of convicted FCPA defendants received probation. In rejecting Harder’s appeal, the Third Circuit held that the district court had considered all of Harder’s arguments as procedurally required, that his sentence was within the Sentencing Guidelines range, and that, “If anything, the chart [of sentences in other FCPA cases] reflected a lack of general consensus on the appropriate sentences for FCPA violators.”
  4. Texas-Based Offshore Drilling Company Resolves Brazil FCPA Allegations with SEC. On November 19, 2018, SEC announced that Vantage Drilling International agreed to disgorge $5 million to resolve allegations that its predecessor, Vantage Drilling Company (VDC), failed to implement adequate internal controls in connection with its relations with its largest shareholder and third-party agents. According to the SEC's administrative order, VDC lacked sufficient internal accounting controls in relation to the heightened risk of conducting business in the oil and gas industry in Brazil and, as a result, increased the risk that it financed bribes to officials at Brazil’s national oil company, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras), by making certain payments to the shareholder in 2008 and 2012. The company neither admitted nor denied the allegations. In August 2017, the company announced that DOJ had declined to pursue charges in the same matter.
  5. DOJ and SEC Decline FCPA Charges against U.S.-Based Education Company.  In a November 29, 2018 securities filing, Laureate Education, Inc. disclosed that it had received letters from DOJ and SEC stating that the agencies had closed their investigations into an $18 million donation by one of the company’s network institutions in Turkey.  In 2016, the company disclosed that it was conducting an internal investigation into the circumstances of the donation and had voluntarily disclosed the matter to DOJ and SEC.  The company also reported it had taken steps to enhance its internal controls and compliance policies and had terminated a senior executive who improperly directed the disbursement of donation funds. 
  6. Three Venezuelan Citizens Charged with PDVSA-Related Offenses. On November 20, 2018, DOJ announced that Raúl Gorrin Belisario, a Venezuelan billionaire who owns Globovision news network, had been charged in the Southern District of Florida with conspiring to violate the FCPA’s anti-bribery provisions and to launder millions of dollars. According to the recently unsealed indictment, the conspiracy allegedly involved laundering funds through a bank in the Dominican Republic in order to pay bribes to Venezuelan government officials in exchange for contracts to conduct currency exchange schemes. Gorrin has been accused of wiring money to the officials and providing them with access to private jets, yachts, homes, horses, high-end watches, and a fashion line through various shell companies. One of the officials whom Gorrin allegedly bribed was Alejandro Andrade Cedeño, Venezuela’s former national treasurer, who pleaded guilty under seal in the Southern District of Florida in December 2017 to one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering. On November 27, 2018, DOJ announced that Andrade had been sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment and ordered to forfeit $1 billion, as well as all of the assets involved in the alleged scheme, including vehicles, horses, aircraft, real estate, and watches. On November 29, 2018, DOJ announced that Gabriel Arturo Jiménez Aray, the former owner of the Dominican Republic bank through which the funds were allegedly laundered, was sentenced to three years in prison for facilitating illegal transactions and bribes through the bank as part of the currency exchange scheme. Jiménez had pleaded guilty under seal in the Southern District of Florida in March 2018 to one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering. These are the latest charges to be announced in the sprawling investigation into alleged corruption and embezzlement at Venezuela’s national oil company, Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA).  
  7. Petroecuador Seeks Restitution from Former Adviser in Bribery Case. On November 27, 2018, Jose Larrea, a former financial advisor at Ecuador’s national oil company, Petroecuador, was sentenced to 27 months’ imprisonment for his role in an alleged conspiracy to commit money laundering. Larrea pleaded guilty in the Southern District of Florida in September 2018 and admitted to wiring over $1 million between U.S. bank accounts to conceal an alleged bribery scheme involving payments made to Petroecuador officials in an effort to obtain new business from the company. On November 26, 2018, Petroecuador filed a motion for the court to recognize its status as a victim and for an order of restitution.1 Petroecuador likely faces an uphill battle.  The same district court judge, Marcia G. Cooke, rejected a similar claim for restitution by Costa Rica’s state-owned telecommunications company, Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad (ICE), in an FCPA case in 2011. (The U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed ICE’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction in August 2012.)  Nevertheless, the ICE decision was fact-intensive, turning on the district court’s finding that ICE was a co-conspirator in the bribery scheme, and it is possible that Petroecuador will fare differently, making this an interesting case to watch. 
  8. SEC Annual Whistleblower Report Documents “Record-Breaking” Total Awards and Number of Tips. On November 15, 2018, the SEC Office of the Whistleblower published its annual report to Congress.  According to the report, the office enjoyed a “record-breaking” year in fiscal year 2018, ordering its largest whistleblower awards to date, awarding more money to whistleblowers who provided “new and critical information” than in all prior years combined, and receiving the highest number of whistleblower tips than in any previous year (a 76% increase since FY 2012). According to the report, 202 of the record 5,282 tips received in FY 2018 related to the FCPA, down slightly from the 210 FCPA-related tips received in FY 2017. The report noted that the Supreme Court’s February 2018 decision in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers to limit Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation protections to whistleblowers who report directly to SEC may have contributed to the uptick in tips in 2018. We predicted such an uptick in our discussion of the Digital Realty case in the February 2018 Top 10. The report is thus another reminder that companies should take steps to ensure that their whistleblower policies and procedures, including anti-retaliation policies, appropriately encourage internal self-reporting. The report noted that SEC staff is currently reviewing comments on new rules proposed in response to Digital Realty that were submitted during a public comment period that ended in September 2018. The report also noted that whistleblower tips were received from individuals in 72 foreign countries, with individuals in Canada (89), the UK (85), Australia (45), and China (40) leading the way. 
  9. SFO Update.
    • SFO Achieves Mixed Results in Oil Contract Bribery Case.  On November 27, 2018, the UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO) announced that three former FH Bertling Group senior executives and one ConocoPhillips employee were convicted for their roles in alleged schemes in which FH Bertling employees made corrupt payments to secure a ConocoPhillips freight forwarding contract, eventually worth over £16 million, and to ensure that ConocoPhillips would ignore inflated prices that FH Bertling charged for additional freight services.  Stephen Emler (FH Bertling) and Giuseppe Morreale (FH Bertling) pleaded guilty in connection with the freight forwarding contract, while Christopher Lane (ConocoPhillips) pleaded guilty and a jury convicted Colin Bagwell (FH Bertling) in connection with the overcharging scheme. The SFO also announced that three other individuals had been acquitted on related charges on November 27, 2018.  (See our September 2017 Top 10 for more on this case.) 
    • SFO Announces Key Priorities. In a November 21, 2018 speech, Matthew Wagstaff, the SFO’s Joint Head of Bribery & Corruption, announced three key priorities for the SFO: (1) progressing cases “at pace,” particularly at the investigation phase; (2) working collaboratively with partners, particularly DOJ, as international anti-corruption enforcement increases; and (3) making the best use of available tools, particularly corporate liability for failure to prevent bribery under the U.K. Bribery Act and deferred prosecution agreements.
  10. Three Chinese Nationals Charged with Bribery in Kenya. On November 26, 2018, prosecutors in Kenya charged three senior employees of China Roads and Bridges Corporation with attempting to bribe Kenyan investigators with 900,000 Kenya shillings ($8,000) to influence an investigation into an alleged plot to skim millions of shillings from the daily revenue of a $3.2 billion railway project funded by China. The arrests are the latest in a series of high profile corruption charges against Chinese nationals and Kenyan officials working on Chinese-funded infrastructure projects in Kenya in recent years. In September 2015, Kenya’s Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission arrested two senior officials at China Roads and Bridges Corporation for allegedly bribing authorities to avoid charges for overloaded trucks. In August 2018, two senior Kenyan officials were also charged with fraud related to the payment of over $2 million to entities who falsely claimed ownership of land affected by the Chinese-funded railway line.
  11. Footnote

    1 United States v. Larrea, et al., 1:18-cr-20312-MGC, Docket No. 97 (S.D. Fla., Nov. 26, 2018).

    Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

    © Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions