ARTICLE
30 August 2017

Significant changes ahead for Australian intellectual property laws

SF
Spruson & Ferguson

Contributor

Established in 1887, Spruson & Ferguson is a leading intellectual property (IP) service provider in the Asia-Pacific region, with offices in Australia, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. They offer high-quality services to clients and are part of the IPH Limited group, which includes various professional service firms operating under different brands in multiple jurisdictions. Spruson & Ferguson is an incorporated entity owned by IPH Limited, with a strong presence in the industry.
The Australian government has released its response to the Productivity Commission's inquiry into intellectual property.
Australia Intellectual Property

The Government has announced the release of its response to the Productivity Commission's inquiry into intellectual property arrangements in Australia.

Key Points
  • The Government has agreed to:
  • Amend the inventive step threshold for patents to reflect that of the European Patent Office;
  • Phase out the innovation patent system;
  • Introduce an objects clause into the Patents Act;
  • Reduce the period that must elapse before a trade mark can be challenged for non-use;
  • Improve the availability of parallel importation for trade marked goods; and
  • Increase the scope of essentially derived variety declarations for plant breeder's rights.

Notably, the Government has no plans to proceed with the controversial recommendation by the Productivity Commission to restrict patent term extensions for pharmaceutical patents.

Moving forward, IP Australia plans to release public consultation papers in relation to a number of the proposed changes, in particular inventive step reform, introduction of an objects clause in the Patents Act and the draft legislation on the phasing out the innovation patent system.

Conclusions

The proposed amendments set out in the Government's response no doubt are intended to strengthen Australia's innovation policy. Previously, however, we have reported here that a number of the Productivity Commission's recommendations will potentially strike a blow against innovators. Accordingly, Spruson & Ferguson will review the Government's response and, if necessary, prepare submissions as part of the public consultation process.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More