CFTC Requests Comments On Proposal To Allow Sidcos To Maintain Federal Reserve Bank Customer Accounts (Fed. Reg.)

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
Comments on the proposal must be submitted by July 5, 2016.
United States Finance and Banking

Under a CFTC proposal, Federal Reserve Banks would be allowed to hold the customer funds of systemically important derivatives clearing organizations ("SIDCOs"). The proposal exempts such banks from legal liability under CEA Section 4d, and from potential third-party claims under CEA Section 22. The CFTC's request for comments on the proposal was published in the Federal Register.

The CFTC specified that the proposal would permit SIDCOs to maintain customer accounts with Federal Reserve Banks pursuant to the standard of liability set forth in the Federal Reserve Bank Governing Documents. The CFTC noted, however, that the proposed exemption would require a Federal Reserve Bank to segregate customer funds deposited by a SIDCO from proprietary funds deposited by a SIDCO, though the exemption also would shield such banks from liability under the CEA's private right of action provision.

The CFTC emphasized that permitting SIDCO-segregated customer accounts to be held at Federal Reserve Banks and enabling SIDCOs to access related services at such banks would augment SIDCOs' liquidity arrangements and enhance the protection of customer funds. The CFTC also maintained that customer funds held at such banks would not be exposed to the risks that are normally associated with commercial banks.

Comments on the proposal must be submitted by July 5, 2016.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More