Clean Power Plan Compliance Deadlines Uncertain

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
Although the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA" or "Agency") was not successful in preventing the stay, the Agency has failed to expressly acknowledge that compliance deadlines must therefore be postponed.
United States Environment

On February 9, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay of the Clean Power Plan pending the disposition of petitions for review currently before the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and any subsequent petitions for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court. Oral argument before the D.C. Circuit is scheduled for September 27, 2016, and an appeal to the Supreme Court is almost certain following the D.C. Circuit's decision. A lift of the stay may therefore not occur until 2017 or 2018. This timeline conflicts with some of the initial deadlines in the Clean Power Plan.

Although the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA" or "Agency") was not successful in preventing the stay, the Agency has failed to expressly acknowledge that compliance deadlines must therefore be postponed. To the contrary, EPA has stated that the Agency will "continue to provide tools and support" to "states that choose to continue to work to cut carbon pollution from power plants." EPA's statements create uncertainty about the Clean Power Plan's implementation schedule, and on May 13, 2016, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce sent a letter to EPA asserting that the Agency is circumventing the Court's order and undermining the relief provided by the stay.

Further information about the impact of the stay is available here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More