ARTICLE
26 April 2016

Data Breach Suit Covered Under CGL Policy

BS
Butler Snow LLP

Contributor

Butler Snow LLP is a full-service law firm with more than 360 attorneys and advisors collaborating across a network of 27 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia. Butler Snow attorneys serve clients across more than 70 areas of law, representing clients from Fortune 500 companies to emerging start-ups
The underlying data breach class-action suit alleged that the insured, Portal Healthcare Solutions, LLC, engaged in negligent conduct that resulted in the plaintiffs' private medical records being publicly available on the internet.
United States Insurance

Earlier this month in an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found that Travelers Indemnity Company of America ("Travelers") had a duty to defend its insured against a data breach suit under the terms of its Commercial General Liability ("CGL") policy.

The underlying data breach class-action suit alleged that the insured, Portal Healthcare Solutions, LLC ("Portal"), engaged in negligent conduct that resulted in the plaintiffs' private medical records being publicly available on the internet. Portal was insured by two Travelers' CGL policies during the time of the alleged misconduct by Portal. Travelers sued Portal in the Eastern District of Virginia, seeking a declaration that it was not obliged to defend Portal against the claims in the class-action complaint.  As grounds, Travelers argued that the class-action complaint failed to allege a "personal injury" as defined by the CGL policies.   Travelers and Portal each moved for summary judgment on the duty-to-defend issue.

Under the policy language, whether a personal injury had been alleged hinged on 1) whether there was "an electronic 'publication' of material"; and 2) whether any "published material gave 'unreasonable publicity' to, or 'disclosed' information about, a person's private life."  The district court first determined that an electronic publication had been alleged: "Exposing medical records to the online searching of a patient's name, followed by a click on the first result, as least 'potentially or arguably' places those records before the public." The district court then determined that the allegation that patients' medical records were searchable on the internet gave "unreasonable publicity to a person's private life."  As a result, the district court held that "personal injury" had been alleged and Travelers had a duty to defend Portal.   The Fourth Circuit "commending the district court for its sound legal analysis" affirmed the judgment on the reasoning of the district court.

The Travelers opinion is yet additional evidence, that whether data breaches are covered by a company's CGL policy, is far from unsettled.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More