ARTICLE
2 December 2015

Delaware High Court Affirms Deferential Standard Previously Determined In Kahn V. M & F Worldwide

PF
Pierson Ferdinand LLP

Contributor

Pierson Ferdinand strives to provide excellent legal counsel and representation to clients worldwide from 20+ key markets in the US and UK. We specialize in handling complex legal matters and providing solutions to our clients' most pressing needs. Our lawyers come from top global law firms, including Am Law-ranked, regional and boutique law firms, federal and state government careers, and senior in-house counsel roles.
The Supreme Court in Kahn v. M & F Worldwide held that, in a landmark decision, freezeout mergers structured with various inherent protections should be reviewed under the highly deferential business judgment standard...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

In the recent one-page order entered by the Delaware Supreme Court in Swomley v. Schlecht, et al., No. 180, 2015 (Del. Nov. 19, 2015), the High Court affirmed a Delaware Court of Chancery decision that provided the first application of the Delaware Supreme Court's prior decision of Kahn v. M & F Worldwide Corp., No. 334, 2013 (Del. Mar. 14, 2014).

The Supreme Court in Kahn v. M & F Worldwide held that, in a landmark decision, freezeout mergers structured with various inherent protections should be reviewed under the highly deferential business judgment standard:

To summarize our holding, in controller buyouts, the business judgment standard of review will be applied if and only if: (i) the controller conditions the procession of the transaction on the approval of both a Special Committee and a majority of the minority stockholders; (ii) the Special Committee is independent; (iii) the Special Committee is empowered to freely select its own advisors and to say no definitively; (iv) the Special Committee meets its duty of care in negotiating a fair price; (v) the vote of the minority is informed; and (vi) there is no coercion of the minority.

A very thorough analysis of the Kahn v. M & F Worldwide decision can be found in an article here, published by the Harvard Law Review.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More