ARTICLE
24 November 2015

FTC Staff Criticize FDA's Draft Guidance On Naming Of Biologics

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
Last month, staff of the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") submitted a comment to FDA addressing the latter's draft guidance on the nonproprietary naming of biological products.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

Last month, staff of the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") submitted a comment to FDA addressing the latter's draft guidance on the nonproprietary naming of biological products. Under the recently issued draft guidance, FDA proposes that a unique, FDA-designated suffix be added to the nonproprietary name of each biological product, including biosimilars. The FTC staff's comment expresses concern that this draft guidance may hinder competition and recommends that FDA consider alternative policies. Specifically, the comment asserts that physicians may mistakenly interpret the different suffixes as indicative of meaningful clinical differences and that such perceived product differentiation would have a dampening effect on price competition between brand products and biosimiliars. The comment cites an example from Europe, where biosimilars with distinct nonproprietary names from their reference biologic experienced less market penetration relative to biosimilars with the same nonproprietary name as the brand product.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More