ARTICLE
5 November 2015

TCPA Class Action Against CallFire Dismissed

KM
Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

Contributor

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP (KMT) maintains an extensive practice, with an international client base, in the rapidly developing fields of Internet, telemarketing and mobile marketing law, sweepstakes and promotions law, gambling, fantasy sports and gaming law, data and consumer privacy law, intellectual property law and general corporate law.
On October 8, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California dismissed a putative class action complaint alleging that CallFire, Inc. violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

On October 8, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California dismissed a putative class action complaint alleging that CallFire, Inc. ("CallFire") violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"). CallFire offers an Internet-based platform through which customers may prepare a text message and send that message to a list of mobile phone numbers provided by the customer. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff received unsolicited text messages from The Sports Network, a co-defendant that remains in the action. The plaintiff argued that CallFire was hired by The Sports Network to send the allegedly unlawful text messages. However, CallFire moved to dismiss the complaint against it, arguing that CallFire is immune from liability under the TCPA because it is a common carrier and did not initiate the text messages at issue.

Is CallFire Immune from Liability Under the TCPA?

TCPA Action Dismissed Because CallFire is a Common Carrier

The Court began its opinion by noting that "[l]iability under the TCPA for an internet-based transmitter of text messages turns on the transmitter's degree of involvement in selecting the content, timing, and recipients of a message as well as whether the transmitter had notice of the illegal nature of the message." The Court then examined the facts and determined that where, as here, "a text messaging service requires its customers to determine the content, timing, and recipients of a text message, then the service has not initiated the message and is merely serving as a carrier." In reaching its decision, the Court found it critical that "CallFire played no part in drafting the content of the messages."

Protect Yourself

We recently blogged about a similar court victory obtained by mobile app provider WhisperText. Both decisions highlight that text message providers are more likely to be found immune from TCPA liability where the customer has greater control over the content, timing and recipients of text messages.

Similar blog posts:

Third Circuit Revives TCPA Class Action Against Yahoo

App Provider Prevails in Drawn-Out TCPA Lawsuit

FCC Digs In Its Heels on TCPA Autodialer Definition

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More