ARTICLE
21 October 2015

OIG Warning: "Information Blocking" May Invalidate AKS Safe Harbor

DP
Day Pitney LLP

Contributor

Day Pitney LLP logo
Day Pitney LLP is a full-service law firm with more than 300 attorneys in Boston, Connecticut, Florida, New Jersey, New York and Washington, DC. The firm offers clients strong corporate and litigation practices, with experience on behalf of large national and international corporations as well as emerging and middle-market companies. With one of the largest individual clients practices on the East Coast, the firm also has extensive experience assisting individuals and their families, fiduciaries and tax-exempt entities plan for the future.
Other examples of possible impermissible "information blocking" may include exclusive data sharing arrangements tied to software or information technology or required payments for data transmission.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

 On October 6, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services released a "policy reminder" alert warning that healthcare companies that prevent patient electronic health records from being shared, known as "information blocking," will not benefit from the electronic health record safe harbor to the federal anti-kickback statute.

The OIG warns that interfering with the transmission of patient information violates the EHR safe harbor condition that the donor "does not take any action to limit or restrict the use, compatibility, or interoperability of the items or services with other electronic prescribing or electronic health recordsystems (including, but not limited to, health information technology applications, products or services)." The alert cites two examples of possible non-compliant activity: (1) an arrangement in which a donor precludes or inhibits a competitor from interfacing with the donated system, and (2) an agreement in which an EHR technology vendor agrees with a donor to charge higher interface fees to non-recipient providers or competitors. Other examples of possible impermissible "information blocking" may include exclusive data sharing arrangements tied to software or information technology or required payments for data transmission.

The OIG alert should serve as a prompt for organizations that have availed themselves of the EHR safe harbor to review their existing arrangements for any conditions that could be construed as improper "information blocking."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More