ARTICLE
2 September 2015

Section 273 Dissolution – What Constitutes A "Joint Venture" (Part II Of II)

The Carmer and Goldfinger Brothers decisions are commonly cited and referred to when determining whether an entity qualifies as a joint venture under Section 273.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Since the 1959 Carmer decision discussed in the prior post, several other noteworthy Delaware opinions have explained what exactly a "joint venture" means for purposes of Section 273 of the DGCL.

Most notably, the Delaware Supreme Court in Warren v. Goldfinger Brothers, Inc., 414 A.2d 507 (Del. 1980)  identified factors to be considered by the Court in determining whether a company qualifies as a "joint venture" as follows:

  1. a community of interests in the performance of a common purpose;
  2. joint control or right to control;
  3. a joint proprietary interest in the subject matter;
  4. a right to share in the profits; and
  5. a duty to share in the losses that may be sustained.

The Carmer and Goldfinger Brothers decisions are commonly cited and referred to when determining whether an entity qualifies as a joint venture under Section 273.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
2 September 2015

Section 273 Dissolution – What Constitutes A "Joint Venture" (Part II Of II)

United States Corporate/Commercial Law
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More