In his weekly Realty Law Digest column (subscription required), Scott Mollen analyzes two notable cases. In 265 West 34th Street v. Chung, a landlord sufficiently stated a claim to pierce the corporate veil. In Board of Managers of the Carlyle at Lawrence Condominium v. Fortuna Fries, a scrivener's error of notice of lien misidentified the fee owner.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.