ARTICLE
2 January 2015

Draft Guidance Issued On ANDA Applicants Obtaining Letter From FDA Stating Safety Protections Comparable To REMS

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
FDA recently released draft guidance on the process by which an ANDA applicant may obtain a letter from FDA to facilitate the ANDA's efforts to obtain reference listed drug ("RLD") product for bioequivalence testing. By way of background, FDA notes that in some instances
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

FDA recently released draft guidance on the process by which an ANDA applicant may obtain a letter from FDA to facilitate the ANDA's efforts to obtain reference listed drug ("RLD") product for bioequivalence testing. By way of background, FDA notes that in some instances, RLD sponsors have refused to sell drug product to ANDA applicants on the ground that doing so would violate the elements to assure safe use ("ETASU") requirements of the product's risk evaluation and mitigation strategy ("REMS"). Historically, at the request of the potential ANDA applicant, FDA has (i) reviewed the bioequivalence study protocols to assess whether the proposed safety precautions are comparable to the ETASU, and if so, (ii) issued letters to RLD sponsors stating so and indicating that supplying the drug product would not be considered a violation of the REMS. The draft guidance document distills FDA's practice to writing to clarify procedures and allow consideration by stakeholders. FDA emphasizes that requesting such a letter is not a legal requirement and that the guidance is intended to clarify the process if the ANDA applicant chooses to do so. Comments due February 3, 2015.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More