May 2012 — The Ontario Court of Appeal just rendered a significant decision in the field of Canadian securities class actions. In Abdula v. Canadian Solar Inc. 2012 ONCA 211, the Court of Appeal ruled that the statutory cause of action for secondary market misrepresentations can be raised against foreign-listed issuers that maintain a "real and substantial connection" to the province of Ontario.

BACKGROUND

A group of shareholders filed a class action against Canadian Solar Inc., whose shares are listed solely on NASDAQ. The claim is centred on misrepresentations contained in documents that were released or presented by the issuer in Ontario, as well as made in the course of investor conference calls.

Canadian Solar Inc. is a Canadian-incorporated company, whose principal place of business is located in China. The company is not required to meet the filing and disclosure requirements of a "reporting issuer" under the Ontario Securities Act1. In these circumstances, the disclosure documents at issue were filed exclusively with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission rather than with any Canadian securities regulator.

ISSUE

The issue before the Ontario Court of Appeal was whether Canadian Solar Inc. can constitute a "responsible issuer" as defined by the Securities Act, and therefore be subject to a statutory cause of action by purchasers in the secondary market. To that effect, section 138.1 of the Securities Act defines a "responsible issuer" as: (a) a reporting issuer, or (b) any other issuer with a real and substantial connection to Ontario, any securities of which are publicly traded.

COURT OF APPEAL DECISION

The defendants argued that, since the issuer is only listed on a U.S. stock exchange, only U.S. securities law should be applied. They argued that the definition of a "responsible issuer" should be restricted to "any other issuer with a real and substantial connection to Ontario, any securities of which are publicly traded in Canada."

The Court of Appeal rejected this argument and concluded there was sufficient reason to conclude that Canadian Solar Inc. meets the Securities Act definition of a "responsible issuer".

The Court of Appeal relied on the fact that Canadian Solar Inc. held its annual meetings in the province of Ontario, has raised money from investors in Ontario by way of private placements, and has filed documents with the Ontario Securities Commission in the past.

With regards to the expressed concerns pertaining to the extraterritorial reach of the disclosed cause of action, the Court of Appeal held that "the general principles with respect to extra-territorial regulation do not require that the definition of 'responsible issuer' be interpreted as confined to issuers any of whose securities are publicly traded in Canada". It added that "the subject matter of Part XXIII.I is a remedy to investors for misrepresentation in certain issuers' secondary market disclosure. In this case, at least some of that disclosure emanated from Ontario. That, together with the relationship of Canadian Solar to Ontario, constitutes a sufficient connection between Ontario and Canadian Solar to potentially subject Canadian Solar to a statutory cause of action...".

IMPACT OF THE DECISION

The ruling in Abdula v. Canadian Solar Inc. promises to provide a solid argument for shareholders looking to institute a securities class action in Ontario, even in cases of non-reporting issuers, whose shares are not publicly traded on a Canadian exchange. In comparison, the U.S. Supreme Court decided the issue by drawing rather opposite trends as to the extraterritoriality concern in its ruling in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. Indeed, the majority provided clear guidance by ensuring, through well-established criteria – which the Abdula ruling is lacking – that extraterritorial application must be limited to cases of true substantial connection, rather than "whenever some domestic activity is involved".

Footnote

1 R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5 [Securities Act].

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.