Nigeria: Of A Renewed Justice Sector, Law, Order And The Rule Of Law

Last Updated: 2 November 2018
Article by Olasupo Shasore and Bello Salihu

A high performing justice sector is an asset for national wealth. It guarantees an orderly society. The quest for justice may be farfetched without the proper functioning of all the compartments that make up the justice sector. Our justice sector will continue to fall short until we can restore the indices of accountability, accessibility, transparency and respectability.

It starts with the "justice ecosystem". The role of lawyers is often recalled as being essential to the means of safeguarding an orderly society in the face of the power of the State and the caprice of kings but not properly provided for in budding democracies.

Recall the capture and extra-judicial killing of Revolutionary Chairman of the Libyan Arab Republic, Muammar Gadhafi along with 66 others, including one of his sons, during Libya civil war of 2011. It vividly depicts a reminder of the damaging effect of the absence of rule of law and disregard for the institution that lawyers represent. Gadhafi was captured, beaten and killed in plain view without recourse to the thought of a trial. Evidence that the public in Libya at the time had little or no confidence in law and order.

Contrast this with the former first lady of Ivory Coast Simone Gbagbo who was recently acquitted in an Ivorian court of crimes against humanity and war crimes linked to her role in a 2011 civil war that killed about 3,000 people. The fair trial enjoyed by Mrs. Gbagbo stems from an observable belief in the justice sector, the rule of law and due process in Ivory Coast.

In Nigeria, we must be extremely alert to cases of violation of the rule of law and due process. Regrettably, some of the culprits remain the law enforcement agencies. The people have continued to endure. The endurance was tested only recently by the clamour for the abolition of a department of the Nigeria Police – the Special Anti-Robbery Squad ("SARS").

Over the years, SARS has grown to become a terrifying arm of the police leaving the unenlightened to believe that men and women of SARS have an unquestionable licence to arbitrarily infringe on peoples' rights. One of the incidents that provoked the recent #ENDSARS campaign began when footage was circulated showing the aftermath of the actions of the police unit killing a young man. This sparked a nationwide outrage. Nigerians have previously complained about police brutality. Numerous accounts emerged with videos of ordeals of brazen disregard for the rule of law. This without a doubt has been a further dent to the utter wane in confidence in the justice sector.

Amongst the citizenry, extra judicial killings and brazen conduct are usually triggered by lack of trust in institutions - evidence of a gradual systemic breakdown of an already fragile order in the society. Citizens in some parts of this country are being killed in purported defence of livestock. Reported cases of plain murder in the name of politics and cultism have gone unaddressed by the relevant arm of government leaving the public to perhaps contemplate that government itself is beginning to lose faith in the justice sector.

This is compounded when law enforcement officers employed to defend and maintain peace in the society turn their instruments of authority against the innocent public, the very people they are paid to protect. That popular paradox, "police is your friend" caught the attention of the Supreme Court in Ochiba v. State [2011] 17 NWLR (Pt. 1277) 663 where the court in condemning the action of the police observed that despite the traditional and constitutional role of the police of fighting crime, some police officers appear to compete with criminals in the commission of crimes they are trained to fight. This was another case where a citizen of this country was killed with a weapon bought with tax payers money for his protection. Of course, the Supreme Court found that it was a senseless killing by a key component of the justice sector.

For clarity, the justice sector is made up of the police, the state prosecution, the courts, the prisons and correctional centers and the people (citizens). Together, we are the body of people that must dig deep and find an abiding philosophy or the society that will not fall any further. The justice sector and indeed the legal profession is in need of an urgent but deliberate redefinition; a directional compass that reassures the public and restores public confidence. There is an urgent need to conduct an audit of the causes and effects of public approval (or lack thereof) for our justice sector institutions. Approval stems from the public's perception of confidence and its satisfaction with total value assurance the legal profession portrays. Simple as that might sound, the confidence of the public is crucial to the continued existence and survival of the legal profession and the justice sector as a whole – it is central to very existence of law and order in our society.

What we must urgently do to install a high performing justice sector

Leadership

Like every other sector, clear and visionary leadership is essential to the optimal performance of the justice sector. Administration of justice must as a matter of urgency be properly resourced at leadership level, either by appointing a dedicated executive in charge of this function or designating a cabinet level member for that purpose. Due to the absence of an acknowledged and identifiable leadership, it is presently performed as an adjunct service at best, being combined with other functions that now lie in priority.

For instance, the administration of the machinery of justice, whereby the legal system is maintained is an executive and not a judicial function. Judges do not administer justice; they adjudicate by way of interpreting the law. In the same vein, it is not for heads of the executive branch of government to "direct the Attorney General to prosecute" nor for the Inspector General of Police to "deal ruthlessly with people found guilty of breaking the law". Each branch of government should comport itself within its constitutional space.

The following matters relate to the administration of justice which do not concern the office of a judge: the organisation of the courts; the prerogative of justice, the prerogative of mercy and any prerogative power to create new courts; nolle prosequi; the appointment, tenure and immunity of judges; the immunity of other participants in legal proceedings, contempt of court; the composition and availability of juries, any requirement that their verdict be unanimous, and the allowances they receive; the branches of the legal profession; and the provision of legal aid and advice.

Respect and insulation of Judges

The office of the judge today is under assault. Judges must be allowed to perform their constitutional role of "judging". The office of a Chief Judge or Chief Justice should not be demonized by compelling it to be the administrator of the courts or superintendent of awards of contracts all in the name of independence of the judiciary. The chief executive of courts who reports to the Minister of Justice, in the United Kingdom is not the Judge (President) of the court; he is an employee of the legal system; this is as it should be.

As long as the justice sector diminishes in respect and dignity, it would lead to a downward spiral of public confidence not only in the law generally but in the economy. An inevitable consequence would be a side-stepping of legal services, resulting in a breakdown of law and order. We need to constantly remind ourselves that a lawless and lawyer-less system is a recipe for anarchy and poverty.

The office of the judge should not be dragged into political battles through election petitions and impeachment proceedings embarked upon by career politicians. A judge must be allowed to keep his oath; decide cases involving 'all manner of people without fear or favour affection or ill will'. As Olajide Olatawura JSC once noted "when you are tempted to tilt the scale of justice on grounds not based on the evidence before you, please return to the oath". Olatawura JSC's stand resonates with the actions of Sir Edward Coke over 400 years ago. Coke was a great English judge who served at a time when judges in England held their offices as it pleased the King. Coke was renowned for his assertion of the independence of the judiciary. In this, he clashed with the King. It was in a case in which the King had an interest. The King attempted to interfere in the court's decision. The King asked the court to stay proceedings until he (the King) was consulted. Coke did not agree. According to Coke, "Obedience to His Majesty's command to stay proceedings would have been a delay of justice, contrary to the law, and contrary to oaths of the judges". When all other judges affirmed the right of the King to be consulted when his interest is involved in a case, Coke was reported to have responded that "When that happens, I will do that which it shall be fit for a judge to do".

In the duty to preserve law and order, the legal profession must be seen as the guardian. This is to promote national development and prevent the descent of society into anarchy. Because public confidence can only be preserved by the standards that we keep, legal practitioners must live up to their role as custodians of our professional ideals. We must restore our judges to their revered position of dignity. They must be protected from all known administrative tension, political pressure or financial anxiety.

Obedience of court orders by the high and the mighty –

Governments, State and Federal are under a constitutional duty to uphold the rule of law and obey court orders whether it is for the payment of court ordered judgment or for the release of politicians charged with bailable offences after bail has been granted by three national courts and a sub-regional court; the Economic Community of West African States Court. Public prosecution must be re-focused. It must be aimed at seeking justice and nothing else. Government must endeavor to refrain from appealing decisions on purely technical points. It is a waste of tax payers' money – it does not meet the ends of justice. The conduct of public cases should not be equated to what obtains in private dispute resolutions where some lawyers have been observed to care too much for law and too little for justice. Such lawyers have turned themselves into technicians spelling out the meaning of words, instead of being, as they should be, men and women of spirit and of vision leading people in the way they should go, making the law fit for the times in which we live in.

The belief that a big corporation can disobey court orders in the same manner as government is a result of observable impunity. The reign of impunity is identified with low performing economies; it is the precursor of a breakdown of law and order. Even if justice is perceived as a commodity, it is not subject to "load shedding" like electricity. If justice must be for all, it cannot be rationed.

Refrain from denigrating decisions of the courts in public

Punditry in the law has now become a lead pastime for some senior lawyers seeking to subtly advertise expertise and relevance. Lawyers can and should air their views when sought after. But reducing potential or ongoing legal disputes to debates on television for public entertainment does violence to our dignity and huge disservice to the institutions that we serve.

In truth we have had several document driven reforms. We now have a new judicial or justice sector policy made by the judicature and a Legal Practitioners Professional Regulation Bill. Although the Bill is expected to address the inadequacies in the legal profession and such other related matters, its fitness for that purpose is already being questioned in the legal community.

Nigeria consistently ranks low in the rule of law index of the World Justice Project. Over the years, the country has been unable to convert this intangible capital, the rule of law, to wealth. The time has come to uphold and promote the rule of law and thereby defend national performance from further decline.

After several years of indecision resulting in policy fluctuation, we have found ourselves in a critical situation that now requires urgent intervention. If we must return the justice sector to its befitting state, credible, purposeful and coordinated leadership in all the institutions of the justice sector must be top priority. This can only be complemented by clearly defined, broad and articulated policy direction capable of inspiring a justice sector that is accessible and accountable while at the same time transparent and respectable.

Originally published January 2018

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions