Nigeria: Enforcing Choice of Law Clauses in Nigeria: [Pacta (will not be) Sunt Servanda] -Where The Transaction is Illegal

Last Updated: 2 November 2004
Article by Adewale Atake

Abstract

As the inflow of Foreign Direct Investment continues unabated in Nigeria, investors are increasingly adopting mechanisms to protect their investments against legal and regulatory risks. One of such methods being adopted in commercial transactions is the use of choice of law clauses. Whilst most investors are inclined to choose foreign laws to govern their contracts, it has become imperative to examine the enforceability of choice of law clauses in Nigeria in particular where the transaction is deemed to be illegal.

Introduction

Choice of law clauses are of critical importance to international transactions. As noted by the United States Supreme Court in the Sherk1, Choice of law provisions, along with forum selection clauses, are almost indispensable precondition(s) to the achievement of orderliness required in international business transactions. Thus, it is not unusual these days, for parties to an agreement to specify the law of a particular country they would want to govern their transaction. Such clauses in an agreement are known as choice of law clauses.

However, in spite of its general acceptability these days in international business transactions, problems do arise where choice of law clauses, although valid, may yet be unenforceable. A recent decision of a Federal Court in the Southern District of New York in Lehman Brothers Comm. Corp v. Minmetals Int’l Nonferrons Metal Trading Co. has again brought to the fore the proposition that choice of law clauses in commercial agreements are no longer to be seen as conclusive or absolute2. For such clauses to be effective, the courts over time have imposed certain limitations. One of such limitations requires the transaction to be legal before a specified choice of law clause can be enforceable. This requirement, which is the focus of this paper, formed the basis of the decision in the Lehman case and to an extent that of our Supreme Court in Sonnar (Nig.) Ltd. V. Partenreedri M.S. Nordwind (owners of the M.V. Norwind)3.

The Nordwind case.

The facts of the Nordwind are as follows:

The Plaintiffs were Nigerian companies claiming damages for breach of contract arising from non delivery of par boiled long grain rice shipped to Lagos from Bangkok on board the M.V. Nordwind. The 1st Defendant, partenreedri M.S. Nordwind (owners of the M.V. Nordwind) carries on its business as shipowners in Germany. The 2nd Defendant, Barbridge Shipping Company is based in Liberia and it issued the Bill of Lading in this case. While the 3rd Defendant, Chaiyaporn Rice Company Limited is based in Thailand and it sold and supplied the rice involved in this case. The Plaintiffs and Defendants entered into an agreement which was evidenced by a Bill of Lading, clause 3 of which provided:

"Any dispute arising under this bill shall be decided in the country where the "Carrier" has his principal place of business and the law of such country shall apply except as provided else where herein" (emphasis mine).

In an application challenging the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court of Nigeria and the applicable law to govern the dispute, both that court and the Court of Appeal, gave effect to the choice of law clause based on the maxim pacta sunt servanda, that is, parties are bound by their contract. Dissatisfied with the judgement of the Court of Appeal, the Plaintiffs then appealed to the Supreme Court. At that court, the appeal was allowed on the basis that the transaction was more significantly connected to Nigeria, a’ fortiori, Nigeria law ought to apply.

Said Oputa, J.S.C. in that case:

"What is the relevance of German law to a Liberian ship owner and a Nigerian Shipper? I see none. It is also conceded that when the intentions of the parties to a contract as to the law governing the contract are expressed in words, this expressed intention is general and as a general rule determines the law of the contract. But to be effective, the choice of law must be real, genuine, bonafide, legal, and reasonable. It should not be capricious and absurd. Choosing German law to govern a contract between a Nigerian shipper and a Liberian ship owner is to my mind capricious and unreasonable. Luckily, nowadays a clause of the proper law by the parties is not considered by the court as conclusive… In this case, the rice was to be shipped from Thailand, the shippers are in Nigeria and the contract was to be performed in Nigeria by delivery in Lagos, Nigeria. The Bill of Lading was issued by a Liberian company. The whole transaction from beginning to end had little or nothing to do with Germany. Why then invoke German law as the proper law of the contract?" (Emphasis mine).

The above statement stands out as the most illuminating discuss of choice of law in contracts by Nigerian courts in that apart from adopting the earlier criteria by Lord Wright in Vita Food Products Incorporation v. Unus Shipping Co. Ltd4, it went on to set new categories for the recognition of an express choice of law. Thus, the requirement that a choice of law clause must be real, genuine, bonafide, legal and reasonable, not capricious and absurd are clearly novel categories and can easily be said to be the contribution of Nigerian courts on the issue of choice of law in International Commercial transactions5.

However, with utmost respect for the highly regarded jurist, Oputa J.S.C. in the Nordwind case, the statement that a choice of law clause must be legal before it can be effective or recognized appears unclear since the legality of the transaction to be performed under the contract was never in dispute. To that extent, that statement of Oputa J.S.C. must have been made Obiter. As regards the requirement of legality though, was Oputa J.S.C. referring to the validity of the choice of law clause itself or was he referring to the legality of the transaction to be performed under the contract?

The safer view, it would appear, is that the respected jurist must have been referring to the legality of the transaction to be performed under the contract. Support for this position can be found in the following statement of Oputa J.S.C. at page 543 of the said judgement:

"….Agreements which is neither contrary to law, nor fraudulently entered into, should be adhered to in every manner and details".

In effect what Oputa J.S.C. seem to be saying is that, where the transaction to be performed under the contract is contrary to law or illegal, the court will not give effect to the Agreement and invariably the choice of law clause. A similar situation was the basis of the decision in the Lehman where the court found that although the choice of law clause was valid, it was unenforceable because the transaction was illegal in the country of performance.

The Lehman Case

The dispute in Lehman arose out of foreign exchange and swap trading transactions during the years 1992 – 1994 between Lehman Brothers Commercial Corporation (LBCC) and its affiliates and HU Xiangdong (HU) an employee of Non-ferrous Metal Trading Company in China (Non-ferrous).

During the relevant period, (1992 – 1994), (HU) an affiliate of Non-ferrous entered into several foreign exchange transactions on behalf of Non-ferrous. A dispute soon arose over certain payments which were due to LBCC under the several contracts between the parties. These payments, save for the first installment, were never made, thus resulting in LBCC bringing an action for breach of contract claims against Non-ferrous and its parent corporation.

On summary judgment, the court observed, that the contracts executed by the parties contained a clause designating New York law to govern their transactions. The court appeared to have no doubt that New York law was enforceable. Nevertheless, the court applying New York law found that the contracts were subject to potential unenforceability because their performance in China was illegal.

The illegality arose from the fact that during the relevant period 1992 – 1994, Chinese law required state owned enterprises such an Non-ferrous to obtain a license from the State Administration Exchange Commission (SAEC) before engaging in foreign exchange transactions. Because Non-ferrous did not obtain any such license, (HU’s) foreign exchange transactions and swap trading were illegal under Chinese law. The court thus held that a New York choice of law provision could not be used to circumvent the laws of a foreign country and was thus unenforceable.

Conclusion

In sum, whilst in the Lehman, the illegality of the transaction was the main focus of the New York Court, in the Nordwind Oputa J.S.C. merely treated this point as Obiter. However, both decisions emphasize the point that for a choice of law clause to be enforceable the transaction must be legal in the country of performance. Where the transaction to be performed is illegal the choice of law clause would be unenforceable even if valid. This is based on the principle that the courts will not give effect to a choice of law clause if the intent is to circumvent the laws of a foreign country. Beyond this point however, the Nordwind went on to state new categories of limitations which must be met before a choice of law clause may be enforceable. These are the requirements of bona fide and reasonableness. It must be real, genuine, not capricious and absurd.

In the final analysis, it behooves parties to commercial contracts wishing to be bound by their designated choice of law clauses to ensure that all of these requirements are met, otherwise, as some lawyers have been known to say, [pacta (will not be ) sunt servanda].

Footnotes

1. 417 U.S. 506, 516 (1984)

2. See Dictum of Lord Atkin in R.V. International Trustee (1937) AC where choice of law clauses

were regarded as conclusive or absolute.

3. (1987) 4NWLR (pt.66) 520

4. (1939) A.C. 277

5. I.O. Omoruyi: The determination of applicable law in international contracts: A Nigerian approach, published in modern practice journal of finance and investment law, July/October, 2004 Vol. 8 No. 3-4 at page 468


Templars Barristers and Solicitors
4th Floor Octagon
13A, A.J. Marinho Drive
Victoria Island Annexe
Lagos
Tel: 269 3650, 774 8660, 774 8658, 320 0130, 320 0131
Fax: 269 0453, 320 0132
E-mail: wale.atake@templars-law.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions