New Zealand: Resource Management Amendment Bill Introduced

Last Updated: 25 February 2009
Article by Daniel Clay

The Resource Management (Simplifying and Streamlining) Amendment Bill (the Bill) was introduced to Parliament on 19 February 2009, and follows various government announcements and substantial public interest in the proposed changes. The Bill proposes significant changes to the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) in an attempt to simplify the processes surrounding plan development and consent applications in New Zealand.

Broadly, the government's reforms are intended to:

  • Fast track nationally significant projects.
  • Limit challenges to planning instruments.
  • Streamline application processes.
  • Streamline decision making processes.
  • Remove frivolous and vexatious appeals, and those brought by trade competitors.
  • Improve compliance through increased penalties.
  • Improve the use of national instruments.

Now that the Bill has been released, the precise mechanisms for achieving the goals of the reforms are known. Undoubtedly, these details will be closely considered by key stakeholders. The next step is for submissions to be heard by the Select Committee which is required to report back to Parliament on or before 19 June 2009. The closing date for submissions is 3 April 2009.

The key reforms and their implications are set out in this Update.


The most publicised reform, and the one which has provided most political mileage for the government, is the proposal to fast track projects of 'national significance'. Under the current RMA regime, the Minister for the Environment has the power to call in proposals of national significance which may then be referred to a Board of Inquiry or Environment Court. The Bill proposes to enlarge this power by:

  • Establishing an Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), to which applications for projects of national significance can be made directly.
  • Widening the scope of projects of national significance to include projects that relate to a network utility operation which extends to more than one region.
  • Empowering the EPA to refer applications to a Board of Inquiry, or to the relevant local authority to be processed under the normal processes.

The main issue associated with this proposal is its impact on public participation, particularly by removing the first instance Council hearing. It is anticipated that public interest and community groups will raise this concern before the Select Committee. The main ground for this is likely to be the loss of the benefit of a Council hearing in encouraging public involvement, as Council hearings tend to be less daunting than those of the Environment Court or the EPA (for instance, the prohibition on cross examination of witnesses and the absence of costs sanctions). Another concern may be the loss of the claimed benefits of good decision making provided by a potential dual hearing regime. However, given that the power already exists to call in projects of national significance, the main difference is the expansion of the scope of projects which would qualify. Wind farm proposals in particular, and other energy projects, will benefit from the widened scope of nationally significant projects.


The Bill proposes limiting appeal rights in respect of plans and policy statements to questions of law only, unless leave has been obtained from the Environment Court to extend the scope of the appeal. Under the current regime, the Environment Court considers the planning merits of planning instruments which are appealed.

The main issue associated with this proposal is that it places heavy reliance on the quality of territorial authority decision-making. A concern is that the benefit of the Environment Court's second and expert opinion would be lost, particularly given that there are invariably amendments made to planning instruments during the appeal stage.

Significant changes to the Council hearing process might also be required. At present, there is no cross examination during Council hearings but a move to limit rights of appeal might also require more rigorous testing of evidence at Council hearings. If so, the first instance hearing before the Council is likely to become more like a court hearing, adding to the formality of the process and leading to increased costs for Councils and other parties involved. In determining whether to grant leave to widen the appeal, the Court will consider whether a Council's decision has a significant impact on property rights, fails to give effect to Part 2 of the RMA or is unclear in meaning or effect. The second criterion may well give rise to a requirement to consider the merits of the decision appealed against in order to determine whether it can be appealed on the merits.


A major plank of this round of reform is to streamline consent and planning processes. The Bill proposes a number of changes to the existing regime including:

  • Neutralising the current presumption in favour of notification of resource consent applications.
  • Removing the non-complying activity category of activities so that these activities become classified as full discretionary activities.
  • Limiting the ability of consent authorities to make repeated requests for further information.

It is difficult to know whether the emphasis on non-notification will bring any practical changes because the vast majority of applications are already non-notified. As with nationally significant projects, the main issue is likely to be the perceived impact on public participation. Removing the non-complying activity category will also reduce a Council's ability to send a clear message about the appropriateness of certain activities, particularly given the limited application of the prohibited activity classification. Objectives and policies in plans may therefore assume more importance in that regard, and perhaps deal more specifically with certain activities.

The changes to plan development processes include:

  • Removing the requirement for local authorities to summarise submissions and call for further submissions on proposed policy statements and plans.
  • Enabling the Regional Council and all local authorities of a region to combine to produce a single RMA planning document.
  • Removing the requirement for local authorities to automatically review their plans every 10 years.
  • Providing that rules and proposed plans have no legal effect until the decisions made on submissions have been notified.

The main concern associated with removing the requirement to seek further submissions is that it will increase arguments over the scope of submissions and relief sought, and the ability of parties to meaningfully participate in unanticipated issues raised by other submitters. Allowing more consequential amendments might well be required to ensure the process runs efficiently.

Suspending the legal effect of proposed rules until submissions have been decided will reduce a Council's ability to manage activities through plans with immediate effect. An implication might be a rush of applications to take advantage of the ineffectiveness of proposed rules.


The Bill proposes streamlining the decision making process by introducing a number of measures including:

  • Providing the ability for applicants or submitters to choose whether they have a notified application considered by elected representatives of a consent authority or by independent commissioners.
  • Enabling applicants to request that their application be referred directly to the Environment Court.
  • Removing the Minister of Conservation's decision making powers for restricted coastal activities.

A panel of independent commissioners may assist in ensuring transparency of decision making and better decision making at Council level. However, the cost of the commissioners would be borne by the person who made the request, a matter which is likely to deter submitters doing so. The opportunity to request direct referral is likely to be of benefit to applicants and submitters by reducing the need for two hearings in cases where an application is likely to end up in the Environment Court in any event. However, as with calling in nationally significant projects, the issue of public participation arises. It is also unclear what criteria a Council will apply to a direct referral request, given the Bill is silent on this.


There has been a lot of publicity about the proposal to remove anti competitive and frivolous objections and appeals. The Bill proposes to address this issue by:

  • Increasing the filing fee for environment appeals from $55 to $500.
  • Reinstating the Environment Court's power to award security for costs.
  • Preventing trade competitors from filing submissions and participating in hearings unless they are directly affected by potential adverse effects of the proposed activity.
  • Allowing applicants to potentially recover all damages associated with an appeal brought by a trade competitor.
  • Extending the prohibition on considering 'trade competition' to include 'the effects of trade competition'.

To date, trade competitors have not been denied the opportunity to participate if they raise legitimate RMA issues. The Bill now proposes a more restrictive approach. The main issues associated with the proposed amendments are that at least some may have a general effect on public participation in the resource consent process, rather than an effect on trade competitors per se. For example, the increased filing fee will affect all of those appealing to the Environment Court and a requirement to provide security for costs may deny certain groups access to justice rather than discouraging unmeritorious appeals.

It is unclear what the intended or actual implications of extending the trade competition prohibition to include its 'effects' will be. This may have an impact on the relevance of 'distributional effects' on town centres.


Maximum fines under the RMA were set at $200,000 in 1991 and have not been changed since the RMA came into force. The Bill proposes:

  • Raising the maximum fine for an offence from $200,000 to $600,000 for corporate offenders and to $300,000 for private individuals.
  • Enabling enforcement action to be taken against the Crown by local authorities.
  • Giving the Environment Court power to require a review of a resource consent held by an offender.

The aim of the amendments is to promote greater compliance with resource consents. However, it is important to note that the maximum fines have rarely been imposed, although the increase in the maximum is likely to increase the average fine.


The current RMA regime provides for national policy statements (NPSs) and national environmental standards (NESs). These are tools which the government can use to provide direction on specific national, regional or local issues. The Bill proposes improving the process associated with national instruments by:

  • Providing the Minister for the Environment and Minister of Conservation with powers to cancel, postpone and restart an NPS process that has already commenced at any time before it is gazetted.
  • Enabling NPSs to direct that a local authority must change the provisions of their policy statements and plans without the need for formal planning processes.

If greater use is made of national instruments, this may help to simplify resource management processes. One benefit of the proposed changes is that the significant costs Councils face in implementing new NPSs and NESs due to plan change processes might be reduced.

Phillips Fox has changed its name to DLA Phillips Fox because the firm entered into an exclusive alliance with DLA Piper, one of the largest legal services organisations in the world. We will retain our offices in every major commercial centre in Australia and New Zealand, with no operational change to your relationship with the firm. DLA Phillips Fox can now take your business one step further − by connecting you to a global network of legal experience, talent and knowledge.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.