New Zealand: Resource Management Amendment Bill Introduced

Last Updated: 25 February 2009
Article by Daniel Clay

The Resource Management (Simplifying and Streamlining) Amendment Bill (the Bill) was introduced to Parliament on 19 February 2009, and follows various government announcements and substantial public interest in the proposed changes. The Bill proposes significant changes to the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) in an attempt to simplify the processes surrounding plan development and consent applications in New Zealand.

Broadly, the government's reforms are intended to:

  • Fast track nationally significant projects.
  • Limit challenges to planning instruments.
  • Streamline application processes.
  • Streamline decision making processes.
  • Remove frivolous and vexatious appeals, and those brought by trade competitors.
  • Improve compliance through increased penalties.
  • Improve the use of national instruments.

Now that the Bill has been released, the precise mechanisms for achieving the goals of the reforms are known. Undoubtedly, these details will be closely considered by key stakeholders. The next step is for submissions to be heard by the Select Committee which is required to report back to Parliament on or before 19 June 2009. The closing date for submissions is 3 April 2009.

The key reforms and their implications are set out in this Update.


The most publicised reform, and the one which has provided most political mileage for the government, is the proposal to fast track projects of 'national significance'. Under the current RMA regime, the Minister for the Environment has the power to call in proposals of national significance which may then be referred to a Board of Inquiry or Environment Court. The Bill proposes to enlarge this power by:

  • Establishing an Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), to which applications for projects of national significance can be made directly.
  • Widening the scope of projects of national significance to include projects that relate to a network utility operation which extends to more than one region.
  • Empowering the EPA to refer applications to a Board of Inquiry, or to the relevant local authority to be processed under the normal processes.

The main issue associated with this proposal is its impact on public participation, particularly by removing the first instance Council hearing. It is anticipated that public interest and community groups will raise this concern before the Select Committee. The main ground for this is likely to be the loss of the benefit of a Council hearing in encouraging public involvement, as Council hearings tend to be less daunting than those of the Environment Court or the EPA (for instance, the prohibition on cross examination of witnesses and the absence of costs sanctions). Another concern may be the loss of the claimed benefits of good decision making provided by a potential dual hearing regime. However, given that the power already exists to call in projects of national significance, the main difference is the expansion of the scope of projects which would qualify. Wind farm proposals in particular, and other energy projects, will benefit from the widened scope of nationally significant projects.


The Bill proposes limiting appeal rights in respect of plans and policy statements to questions of law only, unless leave has been obtained from the Environment Court to extend the scope of the appeal. Under the current regime, the Environment Court considers the planning merits of planning instruments which are appealed.

The main issue associated with this proposal is that it places heavy reliance on the quality of territorial authority decision-making. A concern is that the benefit of the Environment Court's second and expert opinion would be lost, particularly given that there are invariably amendments made to planning instruments during the appeal stage.

Significant changes to the Council hearing process might also be required. At present, there is no cross examination during Council hearings but a move to limit rights of appeal might also require more rigorous testing of evidence at Council hearings. If so, the first instance hearing before the Council is likely to become more like a court hearing, adding to the formality of the process and leading to increased costs for Councils and other parties involved. In determining whether to grant leave to widen the appeal, the Court will consider whether a Council's decision has a significant impact on property rights, fails to give effect to Part 2 of the RMA or is unclear in meaning or effect. The second criterion may well give rise to a requirement to consider the merits of the decision appealed against in order to determine whether it can be appealed on the merits.


A major plank of this round of reform is to streamline consent and planning processes. The Bill proposes a number of changes to the existing regime including:

  • Neutralising the current presumption in favour of notification of resource consent applications.
  • Removing the non-complying activity category of activities so that these activities become classified as full discretionary activities.
  • Limiting the ability of consent authorities to make repeated requests for further information.

It is difficult to know whether the emphasis on non-notification will bring any practical changes because the vast majority of applications are already non-notified. As with nationally significant projects, the main issue is likely to be the perceived impact on public participation. Removing the non-complying activity category will also reduce a Council's ability to send a clear message about the appropriateness of certain activities, particularly given the limited application of the prohibited activity classification. Objectives and policies in plans may therefore assume more importance in that regard, and perhaps deal more specifically with certain activities.

The changes to plan development processes include:

  • Removing the requirement for local authorities to summarise submissions and call for further submissions on proposed policy statements and plans.
  • Enabling the Regional Council and all local authorities of a region to combine to produce a single RMA planning document.
  • Removing the requirement for local authorities to automatically review their plans every 10 years.
  • Providing that rules and proposed plans have no legal effect until the decisions made on submissions have been notified.

The main concern associated with removing the requirement to seek further submissions is that it will increase arguments over the scope of submissions and relief sought, and the ability of parties to meaningfully participate in unanticipated issues raised by other submitters. Allowing more consequential amendments might well be required to ensure the process runs efficiently.

Suspending the legal effect of proposed rules until submissions have been decided will reduce a Council's ability to manage activities through plans with immediate effect. An implication might be a rush of applications to take advantage of the ineffectiveness of proposed rules.


The Bill proposes streamlining the decision making process by introducing a number of measures including:

  • Providing the ability for applicants or submitters to choose whether they have a notified application considered by elected representatives of a consent authority or by independent commissioners.
  • Enabling applicants to request that their application be referred directly to the Environment Court.
  • Removing the Minister of Conservation's decision making powers for restricted coastal activities.

A panel of independent commissioners may assist in ensuring transparency of decision making and better decision making at Council level. However, the cost of the commissioners would be borne by the person who made the request, a matter which is likely to deter submitters doing so. The opportunity to request direct referral is likely to be of benefit to applicants and submitters by reducing the need for two hearings in cases where an application is likely to end up in the Environment Court in any event. However, as with calling in nationally significant projects, the issue of public participation arises. It is also unclear what criteria a Council will apply to a direct referral request, given the Bill is silent on this.


There has been a lot of publicity about the proposal to remove anti competitive and frivolous objections and appeals. The Bill proposes to address this issue by:

  • Increasing the filing fee for environment appeals from $55 to $500.
  • Reinstating the Environment Court's power to award security for costs.
  • Preventing trade competitors from filing submissions and participating in hearings unless they are directly affected by potential adverse effects of the proposed activity.
  • Allowing applicants to potentially recover all damages associated with an appeal brought by a trade competitor.
  • Extending the prohibition on considering 'trade competition' to include 'the effects of trade competition'.

To date, trade competitors have not been denied the opportunity to participate if they raise legitimate RMA issues. The Bill now proposes a more restrictive approach. The main issues associated with the proposed amendments are that at least some may have a general effect on public participation in the resource consent process, rather than an effect on trade competitors per se. For example, the increased filing fee will affect all of those appealing to the Environment Court and a requirement to provide security for costs may deny certain groups access to justice rather than discouraging unmeritorious appeals.

It is unclear what the intended or actual implications of extending the trade competition prohibition to include its 'effects' will be. This may have an impact on the relevance of 'distributional effects' on town centres.


Maximum fines under the RMA were set at $200,000 in 1991 and have not been changed since the RMA came into force. The Bill proposes:

  • Raising the maximum fine for an offence from $200,000 to $600,000 for corporate offenders and to $300,000 for private individuals.
  • Enabling enforcement action to be taken against the Crown by local authorities.
  • Giving the Environment Court power to require a review of a resource consent held by an offender.

The aim of the amendments is to promote greater compliance with resource consents. However, it is important to note that the maximum fines have rarely been imposed, although the increase in the maximum is likely to increase the average fine.


The current RMA regime provides for national policy statements (NPSs) and national environmental standards (NESs). These are tools which the government can use to provide direction on specific national, regional or local issues. The Bill proposes improving the process associated with national instruments by:

  • Providing the Minister for the Environment and Minister of Conservation with powers to cancel, postpone and restart an NPS process that has already commenced at any time before it is gazetted.
  • Enabling NPSs to direct that a local authority must change the provisions of their policy statements and plans without the need for formal planning processes.

If greater use is made of national instruments, this may help to simplify resource management processes. One benefit of the proposed changes is that the significant costs Councils face in implementing new NPSs and NESs due to plan change processes might be reduced.

Phillips Fox has changed its name to DLA Phillips Fox because the firm entered into an exclusive alliance with DLA Piper, one of the largest legal services organisations in the world. We will retain our offices in every major commercial centre in Australia and New Zealand, with no operational change to your relationship with the firm. DLA Phillips Fox can now take your business one step further − by connecting you to a global network of legal experience, talent and knowledge.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions