New Zealand: Sentencing under the new health & safety regime

Last Updated: 16 November 2017
Article by Jonathan Scragg

Most Popular Article in New Zealand, November 2017

We are now over one year on from the introduction of the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (the Act). The Act has significantly reformed New Zealand's health and safety regime.

The regime is of significance to the insurance market given the prevalence of insurance cover, commonly bought as 'statutory liability' cover by businesses in New Zealand, to protect against some of the consequences of a prosecution under the Act. Such statutory liability insurance typically covers legal defence costs and reparation payments to be made under the Act. Fines cannot be insured. Under the new regime, defendants may also be required to contribute to the costs incurred by WorkSafe New Zealand (the new agency charged with administering and enforcing the Act) in pursuing prosecution. The Act does not preclude these awards being insurable, but whether cover exists will depend on the specific policy wording.

The Court's approach to awards of reparation has not changed under the new Act and to date, has been consistent with awards ordered under the previous Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992.

The Court's approach to determining the level of fine to be imposed, however, is likely to change given the Act's introduction of new, substantially higher, maximum fines for health and safety infringements. The maximum penalty for offences by a body corporate, for instance, has increased six-fold from $250,000 under the former regime to $1,500,000 under the Act. Although such fines cannot be insured, the potential for such substantial increases in the fines imposed under the Act ought to be of interest to the insurance market. It is likely that substantially higher fines will lead to greater numbers of defendant parties facing liquidation or bankruptcy, and it may be that directors of defendant parties will be more likely to face prosecution as a result.

At the time of writing, the District Courts have delivered four sentencing decisions under the new Act, with no appellate decisions yet issued. Those four decisions are summarised below. The diversity in approaches taken by the Courts in the decisions to date indicates the Courts are grappling with how best to approach the new sentencing regime, and suggests they would likely be aided by some early appellate guidance being provided, particularly on the approach to the level of fine to be imposed.

Aside from a significant uplift in fines, another key feature introduced by the new regime is the availability of enforceable undertakings as an alternative to prosecution. An enforceable undertaking is a legally binding agreement between WorkSafe New Zealand and a duty holder, which is entered into on a voluntary basis following a breach. The agreement details actions the duty holder must undertake to respond to the contravention. Two examples, one involving Zespri and the other the trust board of St Kentigern's College, are discussed below, including in terms of the challenges enforceable undertakings are likely to pose for insurers when dealing with health and safety breaches by insureds.

Sentencing under the former regime

Under the former regime, the approach taken to assessing the quantum of penalty was set out by the High Court in Department of Labour v Hanham & Philp Contractors Limited1. Hanham provided that setting the starting point for a fine involved the Court making an assessment of culpability within the following scale:

Culpability band Fine
Low culpability Up to $50,000
Medium culpability $50,000 to $100,000
High culpability $100,000 to $175,000

The court in Hanham noted, however, that the figure of $175,000 at the upper end of the high culpability band was not intended to preclude a greater fine up to the statutory maximum of $250,000 in cases of extremely high culpability.

WorkSafe New Zealand v Rangiora Carpets Limited2

An employee slipped off the side of a mezzanine floor and fell 2 ½ metres through a false ceiling. She suffered a number of broken bones and a laceration to her head. She was hospitalised for eight days and her husband had to take eight weeks off work to assist her at home while she recovered.

WorkSafe New Zealand submitted that the culpability bands from Hanham (including the de facto fourth band reserved for instances of extremely high culpability) could be translated to sentencing under the new regime simply by uplifting the thresholds of each band as follows:

Culpability band Fine
Low culpability Up to $500,000
Medium culpability $500,000 to $1,000,000
High culpability $1,000,000 to $1,500,000

In supplementary submissions, WorkSafe put forward an alternative four-band approach:

Culpability band Fine
Low culpability Up to $400,000
Medium culpability $400,000 to $800,000
High culpability $800,000 to $1,200,000
Very high culpability $1,200,000 to $1,500,000

Judge Gilbert expressed concerns that both WorkSafe New Zealand's three-band and four-band approaches would compromise consistency by allowing for enormous potential variation in levels of fines within each band. He therefore approached the sentencing by proposing six culpability bands as follows:

Culpability band Fine
Low $0 to $150,000
Low/Medium $150,000 to $350,000
Medium $350,000 to $600,000
Medium/High $600,000 to $850,000
High $850,000 to $1,100,000
Extremely High $1,100,000 +

Ultimately Judge Gilbert adopted a starting point of $300,000, based on an assessment of the defendant's culpability as being near the cusp of the low/medium and medium bands. Judge Gilbert noted the need for appellate guidance but considered that the inclusion of further bands along with modified penalty ranges gave effect to Parliament's intention to increase the fines but provides a more workable framework than that proposed by WorkSafe New Zealand. Judge Gilbert ordered Rangiora Carpets Limited to pay a fine of $157,000, reparation of $20,000, and prosecution costs of $1,228.

WorkSafe New Zealand v Burrows3

The victim, a child, was a friend of the defendant's son. He had sustained serious injuries when he had fallen under the wheels of a truck that was being used to wet down the track used for training race horses.

The defendant had limited financial means and the sentencing Judge decided not to impose a fine. Starting points and culpability were not discussed in the sentencing notes. Reparation of $23,726 was ordered, but no award as to costs was made.

WorkSafe New Zealand v Budget Plastics (New Zealand) Limited4

An employee's hand was partially amputated when it was caught in the auger of a plastic extrusion machine.

As in Rangiora Carpets, WorkSafe New Zealand submitted the bands from Hanham should be transposed across the full spectrum of available fines under the new regime. The court again responded with concerns that such broad bands would make it difficult to achieve consistency, and result in a starting point that is "too high".

Judge Large commented that "it was not for the District Court to make sentencing guidelines", before finding that culpability was moderate in the Budget Plastics case given:

  1. the obvious risk of serious injury;
  2. the actual injury sustained (partial amputation of hand);
  3. potential for more severe injury; and
  4. foreseeability of the harm, the risk had been identified in a prior audit but steps and not been taken to address the risk.

Notably, the Court said that case law from Australia is not particularly relevant given differences in the legislation and the different approach to assessing culpability taken by the Australian courts.

The Judge adopted a starting point of between $400,000 and $600,000. After adjustments, the final orders made against Budget Plastics were a fine of $100,000, reparation of $37,500 and a contribution to WorkSafe New Zealand's costs of $1,000.00.

WorkSafe New Zealand v The Tasman Tanning Company Limited

An employee, a forklift driver in the tanning industry, was exposed to hydrogen sulphide gas when he was shifting containers. The worker lost consciousness twice, resulting in a concussion, facial gashes and a nose injury. Tasman Tanning had been sentenced five years prior for similar health and safety breaches.

At the time of writing, the full sentencing notes had not been released. It is understood, however, that the Court did not favour the six-band system applied in Rangiora Carpets and instead applied the four-band approach promulgated by WorkSafe New Zealand. It is understood the Court adopted a starting point of $700,000, which was increased to $735,000 for the prior conviction, and then reduced to produce an ultimate fine of $380,000, together with reparation of $18,000.

Early lessons

Rangiora Carpets, Burrows, Budget Plastics and Tasman Tanning reveal a general desire for appellate guidance in relation to the approach to be taken to sentencing under the Act. Until such guidance is received, the District Courts will likely continue to draw on the approach taken under the old regime, and assess what uplift is necessary under the new Act.

One factor it will be interesting to watch is whether the Courts move towards a graduated approach to sentencing under the new Act, reflecting the scale of a defendant's business. Given the significantly greater maximum fines available under the new Act, there is a danger that without a graduated approach, small businesses may find themselves out of business, while larger businesses do not feel the impact of the new regime. For the meantime, though, sentencing under the new regime remains in a state of flux, marked by some inconsistency and uncertainty.

Enforceable Undertakings

Finally, it is worth noting two cases which have resulted in enforceable undertakings being agreed as alternatives to prosecutions.

The first enforceable undertaking entered into under the Act occurred when two St Kentigern College students suffered serious lacerations to their throats when putting on a stage performance of Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street. WorkSafe New Zealand agreed to accept an enforceable undertaking in lieu of prosecution. The school's trust board agreed to undertake a restorative justice process, including payment of reparations to the injured students. The board also committed to taking steps to improve health and safety within the wider education sector through the development of health and safety guidance and the building and delivery of training for the benefit of schools nationwide. The estimated total cost of the undertaking was $85,682.88.

An enforceable undertaking has also been accepted from Zespri International Limited in relation to a quad bike fatality that occurred at one of Zespri's kiwifruit orchards. In announcing the arrangement, WorkSafe New Zealand noted that an enforceable undertaking is not usually accepted where an alleged contravention has resulting in a fatality, but in this case Zespri's failures were not directly causative of the death. Zespri's undertakings included sponsoring the Horticultural Industry Health and Safety forum, establishing a tertiary scholarship for health and safety studies, and funding research into high hazard areas of the industry. The total expenditure was estimated to be at least $249,500.

For the insurance market, it will be interesting to see how policies respond to enforceable undertakings. Such undertakings may be beneficial for insurers in that they are likely to reduce the defence costs insurers might otherwise incur in dealing with a health & safety prosecution. On the other hand, enforceable undertakings are voluntary arrangements and it remains uncertain how insurers will respond to requests that they meet the costs of defendants implementing such arrangements, such as the cost of providing educational materials.

Footnotes

1(2008) 9 NZELC 93,095; (2008) 6 NZELR 79 (HC).

2 [2017] NZDC 22587.

3 [2017] NZDC 2011.

4 [2017] NZDC 17395.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions