New Zealand: Case Note: Coromandel Watchdog Of Hauraki Incorporated v Chief Executive Of The Ministry Of Economic Development And Anor CA CA285/05 (31 October 2007)

Last Updated: 11 January 2008
Article by Helen Atkins

The status of a 'prohibited activity' specifically in relation to mining was under review in this recent case heard by the Court of Appeal.

The Facts

The environmental group, Coromandel Watchdog, sought and got special leave from the Court of Appeal to answer the following question:

Did the High Court err in holding that if a prohibited activity status can only be used when a planning authority is satisfied that, within the time span of the Plan, the activity in question should in no circumstances ever be allowed in the area under consideration?

The short answer is the Court of Appeal said yes the High Court did err, and it remitted the matter in issue back to the Environment Court.

The matter at issue concerned mining in the Coromandel - an issue of some considerable history.

Of particular note is who the parties in this case actually were.  As noted Coromandel Watchdog (a well known opponent of mining in the Peninsula) was the appellant. The other parties were interesting in terms of who they are and why they were involved.  Note the Thames Coromandel District Council (TCDC) was not a party to this appeal though it was in the earlier related proceedings.

The Ministry of Economic Development (MED) and the New Zealand Minerals Industry Association (NZMIA) - the respondents - had similar interests.  Both wanted to see the proposed district plan give appropriate recognition of mineral and aggregate resources and the provision of their use. By way of context parts of the Coromandel are known to have significant deposits of gold and silver.

The two Auckland Councils (the city and the regional) sought and achieved status as interveners. As councils they were interested in the general question being asked by Coromandel Watchdog though obviously not the specifics relating to mining in the Coromandel.

Mining in the Coromandel has a long and tortious resource management history that culminated, in the case of these proceedings in the TCDC providing in its decisions versions of the proposed district plan that mining would be a prohibited activity in the conservation and coastal zones, and in all recreation and open space policy areas.  In all other areas and zones it was non-complying.

The matter, not surprisingly went to the Environment Court. By the time of the hearing TCDC had modified its stance and moved more towards the position that MED and NZMIA were requesting. Needless to say this stance did not meet the concerns of any of the parties.

Defining A 'Prohibited Activity'

During the course of the Environment Court's consideration, a philosophical debate arose was as to whether prohibited activity was an appropriate status where a planning authority did not necessarily rule out an activity, but wished to ensure that a proponent of the activity would need to initiate a 'plan change'. The Court of Appeal summarised the Environment Court's position as:

 [3] In short, the Environment Court held that prohibited activity status should not be used unless an activity is actually forbidden.  In the words of the Environment Court (at [13]), prohibited activity status "should be used only when the activity in question should not be contemplated in the relevant place, under any circumstances".  In particular, the Environment Court held at [12]:

It is not, we think, legitimate to use the prohibited status as a de facto, but more complex version of a non-complying status. In other words, it is not legitimate to say that the term prohibited does not really mean forbidden, but rather that while the activity could not be undertaken as the Plan stands, a Plan Change to permit it is, if not tacitly invited, certainly something that would be entertained.

 [U]nless it can definitively be said that in no circumstances should mining ever be allowed on a given piece of land, a prohibited status is an inappropriate planning tool.

An important factual finding of the Environment Court (in the view of the Court of Appeal) related to the Court's criticism of TCDC for inconsistency in its treatment of some activities that had essentially the same effect as mining - ie quarrying and production forestry.

In essence, the case for Coromandel Watchdog was that the Environment and High Court were wrong in holding that the Council was incorrect to categorise mining as a prohibited activity in circumstances where the Council contemplated the possibility of mining activities occurring, but wanted to ensure that such activities could only occur if a plan change was approved. In short the criticism of the Environment and High Court's decisions were that they had set the test for prohibited activities too high.

In considering the primary question posed by Coromandel Watchdog the Court of Appeal provides a detailed overview of the provisions of the RMA relevant to prohibited activities and all those sections that pertain to plan formulation. The Court examined the interplay between sections 5, 32 and 75, observing:

[28] The important point for present purposes is that the exercise required by s 32, when applied to the allocation of activity statuses in terms of s 77B, requires a council to focus on what is "the most appropriate" status for achieving the objectives of the district plan, which, in turn, must be the most appropriate way of achieving the purpose of sustainable management.

The Court also recognised that in addition to the s32 cost/benefit analysis, the Council must also have regard to its functions under section 31, the Part 2 purpose and principles, section 74 matters, and in relation to rules, the actual or potential effect on the environment of activities, including any adverse effects.

The Court agreed that none of these requirements and criteria gave support to the restrictive interpretation of prohibited activity that had been adopted by both the Environment and High Courts, to recap that prohibited activity status is only appropriate for absolutely forbidden activities. 

The two intervening Councils had a slightly different position than that of the Coromandel Watchdog. They supported the case that the test for prohibited activities was not that high but said that having regard to section 32's emphasis on the most appropriate outcome, a prohibited activity classification could be imposed validly in a wide range of circumstances. These circumstances, included:

  • Where a planning authority has insufficient information as to the likely effects and takes a precautionary approach, even though it does not rule out the possibility of that activity being permitted in the future.
  • Where the Council takes a purposively staged approach or wishes to ensure a comprehensive development.
  • Where it is necessary to allow an expression of social or cultural outcomes or expectation, for example prohibited nuclear power was expressly mentioned. Another example is the debate over GE crops.
  • Where the classification is intended to restrict the allocation of resources, for example aquaculture location.
  • When a council wishes to establish priorities otherwise than on a 'first in first served' basis.
The Judgment

The Court of Appeal did not comment in detail on the merits of the particular scenarios posed by the interveners but noted that in some of the cases the 'bright-line' test of the Environment Court would not be met (that is that a local authority must consider that an activity be forbidden outright, with no contemplation of any change or exception, before prohibited activity status would be appropriate). The Court went onto observe, however, that having regard to the broad considerations applying to the formulation of a plan, a local authority could rationally conclude that prohibitive activity status was the most appropriate status. 

The Court went on to comment that councils should not use a prohibited activity classification to defer undertaking an evaluation of a particular activity until it received a specific application to do so. 

Overall the Court of Appeal agreed with Coromandel Watchdog's submission that prohibited does not mean forbidden (as held by the Environment Court).

There was some debate over whether the matter ought to be remitted back to the Environment Court in the circumstances. That is the substantive matter had moved on since the case had been heard in the Environment Court with the parties having been in negotiations. The Court of Appeal was unable to conclude that the Environment Court's decision would be unaffected by the appeal and remitted it back to that Court.

Phillips Fox has changed its name to DLA Phillips Fox because the firm entered into an exclusive alliance with DLA Piper, one of the largest legal services organisations in the world. We will retain our offices in every major commercial centre in Australia and New Zealand, with no operational change to your relationship with the firm. DLA Phillips Fox can now take your business one step further − by connecting you to a global network of legal experience, talent and knowledge.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.