New Zealand: Metamorphosis In The District Court

In this article, Emily Walton, an associate with the Christchurch Lawlink firm of Wynn Williams & Co, details the reforms that are about to take place in the District Court.

Radical changes to civil procedure are on the horizon with the recently released draft District Courts Rules 2007. This article addresses why, how and will the draft rules work?

Why: Background To The Review

Of all civil claims filed in the District Court nationwide, only about 6% evoke a formal response and fewer still ever reach a hearing.

Nonetheless, as the court in which most civil claims for up to $200,000 are filed, the volume of claims, even unanswered, is high and criticism is frequently levelled at the District Court for expense, delay and inefficiencies. Similar criticism has led to review and reform of civil litigation in both England and Australia over the past decade.

Review of District Court procedure has the fundamental objective, identified by the District Court Claims sub-committee, of ensuring the procedure required for a claim should be no more or no less comprehensive than is required fairly and justly to determine it.

Early exchange of information is evidently crucial to achieving this objective. The traditional pre-trial processes are perceived as inevitably cumbersome, time consuming, and frequently at a disproportionate cost.1

By the draft rules, the Rules Committee hopes to create "a streamlined process providing sufficient relevant and shared information will allow settlement to be explored very early on."2

Part 2 of the draft rules overhauls the early claim procedure, summary judgment (a process for obtaining judgment on the papers without a trial where liability is clear), and the trial itself. In future the bulk of civil claims will be governed by this part, with some exceptions including defamation (and see parts 6 to 10 of the draft rules).

Major overhaul will be correspondingly necessary to those whose strategic approach to civil litigation involves employing endless pre-trial applications and interrogatories to punish, bully or protract. Is this the dawning of a new age?

How: A Summary Of Part 2

Commencement Of Proceedings

Proceedings commence with the plaintiff filing a Notice of Claim and serving it on the defendant as soon as practicable. If the Notice is unserved after 12 months, the plaintiff’s claim comes to an end.

The prescribed form for a Notice of Claim is still to come, but its required contents are not dissimilar to Statements of Claim under the existing rules. Materially, the plaintiff (or its solicitor) must now verify by sworn statement the truth of facts pleaded.

The defendant then has 20 working days to serve the plaintiff with its Response. Again, the prescribed form is pending, but the Response is essentially a Defence verified by a sworn statement, albeit it is not filed with the court at this stage.

Then things become radically different. The plaintiff has 20 working days to serve an information capsule on the defendant and the defendant must respond, serving its information capsule up to 20 working days later.

Information capsules are a new concept in New Zealand, although similar measures have been introduced in both England and Australia. The information capsule lists a party's witnesses, attaches "will say" statements for each witness and lists or describes the documents essential to that party's position. The contents must be verified by sworn statement and neither information capsule is filed with the court.

Mandatory exposure of the strengths and weaknesses of each party’s position is impliedly expected to encourage exploration of settlement as the Rules Committee has allowed time for negotiation, giving the plaintiff 90 working days to pursue its claim by filing a Notice of Pursuit of Claim. With it, the plaintiff files the previously unfiled Response and both information capsules with the court.

The plaintiff’s claim ends if it fails to serve its information capsule or file and serve a Notice of Pursuit of Claim within the prescribed time.

Conversely, if the defendant fails to serve its Response or its information capsule within the prescribed time the plaintiff may apply for judgment by default or on formal proof.

The rules for third parties, counterclaims and claims between defendants follow the corresponding provisions in the existing rules.

Settlement Conferences And Trial

There will be three types of trial: summary, simplified or full.

The court or Registrar shall decide whether to allocate a summary trial within 10 working days of receiving proof of service of the Notice of Pursuit of Claim.

Where a summary trial is allocated, only limited pre-trial steps (exchanging further "will say" statements and/or further evidentiary documents) are allowed and summary judgment is not available. Restrictive time frames are prescribed for the giving and testing of evidence and submissions at trial.

If a summary trial is not allocated, a Judicial Settlement Conference is arranged for as soon as practicable after 20 working days from that date.

Where the claim does not settle at the Judicial Settlement Conference, the conference becomes a Judicial Directions Conference where the judge will allocate it to a simplified or a full trial. Orders may be made on any interlocutory applications and case management directions made. A trial date may be set.

The Judicial Directions Conference is the plaintiff’s first opportunity to apply for summary judgment. Summary judgment is available only if a simplified trial or full trial is allocated.

For simplified trials, pre-trial disclosure and interlocutory applications available are more limited than for full trials. Witnesses only need appear if a party has filed and served a notice to cross-examine before trial, or the judge requests it. Each party is limited to one expert witness per specialised discipline.

The High Court Rules procedure is applied to full trials.

Will The Draft Rules Work?

In June 2007, District Court Judge Doherty presented a seminar on Judicial Settlement Conferences at the University of Canterbury during which he revealed the preliminary statistics distilled from the Judicial Settlement Conference pilot scheme which has run in the Christchurch District Court since 2003. The scheme incorporates an exchange of information not dissimilar to that proposed in the draft rules. Of a total of 514 defended claims:

  • 20% settled after a Notice of Judicial Settlement Conference had been sent to the parties but before the Judicial Settlement Conference took place;
  • 33% settled at the Judicial Settlement Conference; and
  • 10% settled within 10 days of the Judicial Settlement Conference.

A staggering 66% of all defended claims settled at or around the Judicial Settlement Conference.

So there is empirical support for having confidence in the new regime arising out of both the pilot scheme and similar reforms in England and Australia.

In England since Lord Woolf's review of the civil litigation and enactment of the Civil Procedure Rules, pre-action protocols have been introduced for many civil claims including defamation, construction and engineering disputes and personal injury proceedings. Early exchange of information and exploration of settlement are consistent themes.

The Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 ("PIPA") in Queensland, Australia also involves pre-proceeding exchange of information, compulsory conferences and even (to the horror of many local practitioners) mandatory settlement offers.

It is apparent from commentary on these overseas civil procedure initiatives that on the whole they are viewed favourably, although not unreservedly so.

Whether our draft rules will achieve their objective of just, speedy and inexpensive determination of proceedings may partly depend on lessons learned from similar international initiatives.

Time Frames

It is not unknown for Statements of Claim to lie in a defendant’s in tray unheeded for too long, sometimes even until judgment by default is entered because the defendant has taken no steps in response.

The prescribed time frames for initial procedural steps, particularly service of information capsules, are undeniably tight. Defendants have just two months to investigate the claim, interview witnesses, engage experts and prepare an information capsule. Some plaintiffs will maximize this advantage, issuing proceedings without forewarning.

This will be particularly challenging where an insurer is involved and coverage must also be resolved during these two months.

One criticism of the English Pre-Action Protocol for Construction and Engineering Disputes found on review by the Technology and Construction Solicitors Association in 2003 was that parties used the process to protract litigation.3

The time frames imposed by our draft rules should prevent this eventuating here but conversely, may be so restrictive that our "streamlined" procedure could be bogged down by applications for extensions of time. Perhaps parties should be free to agree extensions of time of up to three months to serve their information capsules as per the revised English Pre-Action Protocol for Construction and Engineering Disputes.

In their current form, the draft rules require that, more than ever, clients need to know it is vital to take immediate advice on any Notice of Claim served, not least to avoid the risk of missing crucial evidence or information when documents are prepared in haste.

Front Loading Of Costs

The Rules Committee acknowledges that "to an extent the new process will result in a greater front-loading of costs when compared to the current civil litigation regime" but suggests the trade off is "the early exchange of basic information is likely to facilitate early settlements between the parties themselves or, failing that, after early judicial intervention."

The preliminary results of the Judicial Settlement Conference pilot scheme indicate this may well be a fair trade-off.

Certainly, since the introduction of the PIPA process in personal injury claims in Queensland, the decline in claims lodged in 2002/3 and thereafter has been dramatic; the number in 2002/3 is down 75% on the preceding year and down by more than two-thirds (68%) from the average of the preceding 7 years.5

Whether this is entirely due to the PIPA procedure or whether the imposition of caps on damages and recoverable costs is also instrumental is unknown, as claims only come to the court’s attention if PIPA fails to resolve the claim. Nonetheless, the statistics are compellingly similar to those of our pilot scheme.

Clients must be aware that a large proportion of costs will now be incurred early in the proceedings and must be encouraged, where appropriate, to explore settlement and alternative dispute resolution before proceedings commence.

Access To Justice/Abuse Of Process

The Rules Committee envisages the filing fee be nominal "in keeping with the access to justice aim of the draft Rules". But in some hands, access to justice can create a miscarriage of justice.

The 2003 review of the English Pre-Action Protocol for Construction and Engineering Disputes found the protocol open to abuse with claimants initiating speculative (or sometimes entirely spurious) claims in the hope that the protocol led to settlement without the need for them to prove their case. This left potential defendants with no obligation but to incur costs in complying with the Protocol without any right of recovery.

Our Rules Committee has endeavoured to guard against such abuses by ensuring an application to strike out a pleading may be made at any time after proceedings are commenced, expressly defined to include the early procedural steps from issuing a Notice of Claim. Costs will be also recoverable for the whole proceedings.

As each Notice of Claim will be filed the court will be able to monitor proceedings from the outset. This is a deviation from the original recommendations released by the Rules Committee in August 2004, but in light of the Queensland experience, a prudent one.


Civil litigation is poised to undergo a procedural and philosophical metamorphosis with the eventual enactment of the District Courts Rules 2007. Although not without their challenges, lawyers should be comforted by the success of similar initiatives overseas and the Rules Committee’s apparent willingness to avoid the pitfalls of those that have gone before us.

Lawyers will need to work with their clients to raise awareness of the changes, the importance of prompt action and the proactive focus on dispute resolution.


1 Rules Committee Consultation Paper 13 August 2007

2 Ibid.

3 Kimberley Eyssell, Charles Russell LLP, Changes To The Pre-Action Protocol For Construction & Engineering Disputes

4 National Trends in Personal Injury Litigation: Before and After "Ipp": Processor E W Wright, Dean and Professor of Law, School of Law, University of Newcastle.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions