New Zealand: Decision – Whangamata Marina Society

Grant Slevin, a solicitor with the Christchurch Lawlink firm of Wynn Williams & Co, discusses the High Court decision that forced the Minister of Conservation to reconsider his refusal of a permit for a marina development in Whangamata.

If people were surprised to learn, in March 2006, that the Minister of Conservation could effectively overturn an Environment Court decision to allow a marina development, they were perhaps less surprised when, in September 2006, the High Court told him to think again.

The basis of these extraordinary events is found in the Resource Management Act 1991, which reserves a process of ministerial review for decisions affecting coastal development, and in the High Court’s power of judicial review, by which it can decide whether decisions made by those in public office should be set aside because they have not been made in accordance with the law.

The development in question, first proposed by the Whangamata Marina Society Incorporated in 1992, would involve the construction of a 300 metre breakwater and control structures to contain four hectares of the coastal marine zone, dredging of a marina basin and channel to it, and the reclamation of 1.4 hectares of salt marsh for a hard stand and parking area. All of this is planned for the Moanaanuanu Estuary of the Whangamata Harbour.

The Minister of Conservation was required to consider the Environment Court’s report, which approved this plan, before deciding whether or not to issue a permit. The reason for that unusual provision, as Justice Fogarty observes in his decision, is because of the importance Parliament attaches to coastal development. The Minister is said to deal with about 25 such permit applications each year.

In the course of reaching this decision the Minister held meetings with interested parties and reviewed the evidence presented to the Environment Court. Focusing exclusively on the issues of whether Tangata Whenua and ecological values would be unduly compromised by the development, the Minister disagreed with Court’s findings and decided to reject the application.

The Minister’s decision was immediately controversial. Bitterly opposed by local iwi, conservationists and surfers alike, the development proposal had cost the Society almost $1m to drive through the planning and Environment Court processes. Many questioned whether any faith or confidence could be placed in a legal process that could be so simply overturned by an apparently political decision.

It then came to light, in a blaze of publicity, that on 1 March 2006 there had been a telephone call from the Minister’s office to the Mayor of Waitakere, Bob Harvey, a known opponent of the development. On the same day Mr Harvey had sent an email to one of the lobbyists opposed to the development, asking him "to assemble for the Minister a range of spokesmen to support him in his decision on the Whangamata bar." Allegations were then made that the whole process undertaken by the Minister was a charade, his mind having been made up from the outset.

While the Act does not provide for an appeal against the Minister’s decision, the law does allow an alternative course of action. Another Act of Parliament recognises a longstanding right for the High Court to review almost any significant decision by a public body, whether made by a cabinet minister or a humble official.

The Court will not decide whether any particular decision made by a public official is correct, but whether it was arrived at in accordance with the law and through a proper process. A decision-maker must consider all matters made relevant by the Act and exclude all matters that are irrelevant, as well as acting fairly towards the parties and adhering to the rules under which the decision must be made.

Most such applications fail, and even the few that succeed do not always result in a different outcome. The result of a successful application will usually be an instruction from the Court to do it again, but properly.

Mindful of the need to let governments govern, the Court will not interfere in decisions that are purely political in nature, or in those that do not affect the applicant’s rights in some substantive way. Nor will it interfere with a legitimate exercise of discretion.

The first question for the Court in this case was accordingly to decide whether the Minister’s decision was a purely political matter, reserved to him as a policy maker on behalf of the government, or an administrative task to be performed in accordance with Parliament’s instructions as set out in the Resource Management Act.

Policies affecting coastal development are contained in a range of national and regional policy statements, to which both the Environment Court and the Minister must have regard. These are not subject to unilateral alteration by the Minister, even if he doesn’t agree with their contents, so it was apparent that his decision could not be a matter of policy.

The Minister’s power to decide whether a restricted coastal activity should be permitted or not is provided by sections 119 and 104 of the Resource Management Act. By closely studying those sections and deciding what they oblige the Minister to do, the Court was able to conclude that the discretion conferred on him is relatively confined, and therefore amenable to its review. Having made that decision, the Court was able to look at what the Minister had actually done and contrast that with what the law required of him. He was found to have made three procedural errors.

First, he set about the task of reconsidering the evidence before the Environment Court. That was a highly specialised task and not one which Parliament had entrusted to him. It was not open to him to disagree with the Court’s conclusions based on the evidence it had heard.

Secondly, the Minister reviewed those materials over only the last few days of the period available to him, and did so without reference to the parties’ lawyers. That was unfair and accordingly in breach of the common law standards of natural justice.

Thirdly, by meeting with interested parties before reaching his decision, the Minister was found to have considered matters that had not been considered by the Environment Court. He should have referred those matters back to the Environment Court for their consideration – a procedure specifically provided for in the Act – but did not do so. Instead he chose to declare, in his decision, that he had not considered any matters that would have required that step and had disregarded the comments made to him during the meetings held at Whangamata. That was not enough. The possibility that he had received additional information, which may have influenced him, was enough to create a risk of prejudice to the Society, which had not been given an opportunity to respond.

The most serious claim made by the Marina’s developers, that the Minister had predetermined his decision and was biased, did not succeed. Although it was clear from a letter dated 22 February 2006 that the Minister had already formed tentative views, that did not amount to predetermination. The controversial communications with Mr Harvey did not amount to proof that a decision had already been made by 1 March, the Court accepting the evidence of Mr Harvey that he did not know what the ultimate decision would be at that stage and similarly the Minister’s evidence that he did not make his decision until 7 March.

Having found that the Minister erred nonetheless, the Court then had to consider whether it should exercise its discretion to set aside his decision. In this case, the errors were of a serious character and the Court was not satisfied that the same outcome would have been reached if a proper process had been followed. Indeed, the early memoranda of the Minister’s staff pointed to a decision the other way.

Having set aside the decision, the Court directed the Minister to recommence the decision making exercise afresh, while also refusing a request for an order that he should delegate the task to another Minister, who would not be affected by the earlier errors.

Having won its case, the applicant Society was awarded costs in line with ordinary principles. It has reported its actual costs at $250,000. Whether it wins the ultimate prize, in the form of a permit, remains, at the time of writing, to be seen.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.