New Zealand: The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Christchurch v RFD Investments Ltd (in receivership) (in liquidation): compensation for land

Last Updated: 6 November 2015
Article by Helen Smith

The Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Christchurch v RFD Investments Ltd (in receivership) (in liquidation)

[2015] NZHC 2647

This judgment considers who is entitled to compensation for land which was compulsorily acquired for one of Christchurch's anchor projects.


RFD Investments Ltd (in receivership) (in liquidation) (RFD) owned a building in Chancery Lane, in central Christchurch. Located within that building was the Holy Cross Chapel.

The land on which the building was built had previously been owned by the Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Christchurch (Bishop), and was transferred to RFD's predecessor in return for the grant of a leasehold interest in a unit title, where the Chapel would be located. The leasehold interest was for 999 years, at a rental of one dollar per annum.

The Memorandum of Lease considered what was to happen if the building was damaged or destroyed, and provided (at clause 25):

  1. " That in case the demised premises shall be damaged or destroyed... the lessor subject to the proviso following and to the obtaining of all necessary permits and consents shall forthwith with all reasonable speed repair and reinstate such damage or destruction...
  2. That if the lessor shall be unable to obtain the necessary consents and permits referred to in sub-clause (i) of this Clause 25 and shall be unable to repair and reinstate as aforesaid, then and in such case the lessor shall pay to the lessee a just and equitable part of the insurance moneys which have been received by the lessor such part to be based on the proportion that the floor area of the demised premises bears to the rentable floor area of the whole building."

The Holy Cross Chapel was substantially damaged but not destroyed by the earthquakes. However, when the blueprint for the rebuilding of Christchurch was drawn up, the site of the Chapel was in the middle of an area allocated for the construction of a new convention centre.

The land was formally designated for the anchor project in the Christchurch Central Recovery Plan, and the Christchurch Central Development Unit (CCDU) issued a notice of intention to acquire land to both RFD and the Bishop.

As a result of CCDU's notice, RFD decided that they could not repair the building, and settled with the building's insurer on an indemnity basis, for approximately $1.5 million. RFD then purported to settle with the Bishop by paying the Bishop 14% of the insurance payout (proportionate to the Chapel's size in relation to the entire building, as required by clause 25(iii)) and claimed that the Bishop had no further entitlements and the lease was no longer on foot.

If RFD's proposition is correct, it would be the sole entity entitled to the compensation to be paid by the Crown for the compulsory acquisition of the land. However if the Bishop's leasehold interest subsisted, the Bishop would be entitled to a share of the payment for the land. The amount of the Crown's payment was just over $9 million.

Is the leasehold interest at an end?

RFD claimed that either:

  • the leasehold interest was terminated under the lease when RFD determined that it was unable to repair and reinstate the building because it could not obtain the necessary consents and permits, and then paid a proportionate amount of the insurance proceeds to the Bishop; or
  • the lease was frustrated.

As frustration can only operate where the contract does not provide for what should happen in the circumstances, the High Court first needed to decide whether the lease made provision for this situation.

What does the leasehold interest include?

The Bishop's leasehold interest is for Unit A of the property, which was the Chapel. Through the Unit Titles Act, all people who have in interest in an individual unit also have a beneficial interest in the common property, which includes the land underneath the building. Justice Davidson confirmed that:

"As lessee of Unit A, the Bishop had a beneficial interest in the substratum as part of his leasehold stratum estate, in proportion to his interest in the whole premises."

The memorandum of lease

RFD's position is that the clause 25 of the lease deals with a situation where the building cannot be rebuilt, and that therefore in the absence of express wording to indicate that the lease is to continue, it must terminate. In contrast, the Bishop's view is that as clause 25 is silent as to the continuation or otherwise of the lease, the status quo should continue.

Justice Davidson said that:

"I reject the suggestion that the parties impliedly intended that the leasehold interest would terminate in the circumstances which engaged Clause 25(iii). The contract should not be taken as having tacitly concluded on the common understanding that the inability to obtain consent for repair work on the Chapel would terminate the lease. Rather, it is entirely logical and commercial to interpret Clause 25(iii) as simply providing the method by which the insurance money was to be allocated when indemnity cover was all that was available."

He went on to say that:

"Reasonable people would not expect that an event which simultaneously signals the end of occupation of both the freeholder and the leaseholder should be visited in its commercial effect entirely on the leaseholder, to the benefit of the freeholder."

Justice Davidson therefore decided that the lease should be interpreted as subsisting after the insurance payout.


The findings on the lease meant that Davidson J was not required to deal with the issue of frustration. However he went on to consider whether the contract was frustrated, in case he was wrong in his original findings.

Justice Davidson noted that "long leases will be less easily frustrated than short leases", and that:

"A short impediment or an impediment the extent of which is uncertain may not terminate a long lease. After all, if the impeding event lasts for a relatively short part of the lease's duration, the parties' obligations cannot be said to be radically different if the event ends, and most of the lease term remains."

He went on to note that:

"The designation of the premises by the CCDU was not necessarily a permanent state of affairs. While the designation turned out to be an accurate indication that the premises would be acquired by the Crown, that was not certain at the time of designation or indeed at any point up until the Crown acquired the land. The inherently contingent nature of designation meant that it would have been speculative to say that the perpetual lease had been fundamentally altered or undermined at that point. If, for example, designation had been revoked and a subsequent consent application to repair the Chapel had been granted, the leasehold interest would have subsisted. It is incorrect for RFD to retrospectively say that designation effected frustration, because before the Crown acquisition, such a view would have been premature."

The fact that there was a mechanism in the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act to deal with compensation for properties with leases on them was also indicative.

"If designation of itself is sufficient to frustrate a lease, then no leasehold owner would be able to claim compensation under CERA. Section 59 would be redundant. Moreover, if compulsory acquisition was prefaced by the designation of some properties and was not so prefaced in respect of other properties, then only lessees in the latter category would receive compensation. The entitlement of a lessee to compensation for the loss of an interest would turn on whether the property was designated prior to being acquired, and thus a matter of chance. This approach to compensation would be untenable."

The result

Justice Davidson decided that the lease is not at an end. The notice of intention could not amount to frustration of the lease, and Davidson J decided that:

"The indemnity insurance payout simply reflected the Crown's notice of intention to acquire and spelt the end of occupancy by RFD and the Bishop but not the end of their respective property interests."

The Bishop should therefore be compensated for the compulsory acquisition of the leasehold interest.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions