New Zealand: Insurance update - Southland Indoor Leisure Centre Charitable Trust v Invercargill City Council

Last Updated: 7 September 2015
Article by Ayleath Foote

The recent High Court judgment of Southland Indoor Leisure Centre Charitable Trust v Invercargill City Council and others [2015] NZHC 1983 has provided some useful statements on duty of care, contributory negligence, betterment, and GST.


The Southland Indoor Leisure Centre Charitable Trust (Trust) owns and operates Stadium Southland.  Construction of the stadium began in 1999, and was completed in early 2000.  During construction it became apparent that the design of the roof trusses was defective, as they began sagging even while the stadium was being built.  Remedial work was designed, consented, and undertaken during the building programme.

The Invercargill City Council (Council) issued a code compliance certificate (CCC) in November 2000, despite having not received some specific information required under the conditions of the building consent for the remedial work, being confirmation from the consulting engineer that the precamber of the roof trusses is in line with the specifications, and the provision of individual trusses' measurements.  That exact information required was never provided, although other information, showing the height of each roof truss from the floor, which satisfied requirements of the Council, was provided in October 2001.

It transpired from the evidence given in the High Court that the Council's principal building officer had not authorised the issuing of the CCC.  Instead the CCC was issued under the signature of a clerk in the consents team, "possibly because a CCC was required before the Trust could be issued with a liquor licence for an upcoming function in the stadium."

After a heavy snowfall on 18 September 2010, the stadium roof collapsed.  Eight people were inside the stadium at the time, but all escaped unharmed.

There was no dispute in this case over how and why the stadium roof failed.  It was agreed that a "combination of poor quality welding and a failure to follow the plans and specifications for remedial work to the roof trusses meant the roof was unable to carry the snow loadings experienced that day."

The issues for the High Court to determine were whether the Council breached a duty of care to the Trust to exercise reasonable skill and care in issuing the CCC, and if it did, whether the Council should be liable for the repair costs.

Did the Council owe a duty of care?

The Council claimed that this case had a unique factual matrix that should take it outside the circumstances in Body Corporate No 207624 v North Shore City Council [Spencer on Byron] [2012] NZSC 83, [2013] 2 NZLR 297, and that there should be no duty of care.

Justice Dunningham said that:

"In the present case, the issue is whether there are any factors which put the Trust outside the finding in Spencer on Byron which recognised a duty of care 'regardless of the nature of the premises'.  I do not think there are.  The decision in Spencer on Byron was not confined to whether the duty of care owed by building regulators applied to a discrete category of buildings beyond residential homes.  Rather, the question was whether such a duty was owed in respect of all buildings coming under the 1991 Act's regulatory regime."

Justice Dunningham noted that the "relative lack of 'vulnerability' of commercial building developers, as compared with residential home owners" was determined by the Supreme Court in Spencer on Byron to be irrelevant, as "a plaintiff did not have to prove reliance as an element of the tort."

The Council therefore owed a duty of care to the Trust when deciding whether to issue a CCC.

Upon establishing that the duty of care existed, it was clear that it was breached at the time that the CCC was issued, as the evidence had showed that the CCC was not authorised, and the information required by the building consent had not been received.

The Council also suggested that even if it owed a duty of care, it was indemnified by the Trust under a clause in the lease, under which the Council leased the land on which the stadium was built to the Trust.  Justice Dunningham decided that:

"The liability claimed in these proceedings does not arise because the Council owns the land.  The liability arises because the Council is the building regulator under the 1991 Act.  Where the liability arises independently of the contractual relationship, I consider express wording will be required to exclude it because otherwise, read objectively, the lease only governs risks and obligations created by entering into the contract and not those which arise independently from it."

The Council could therefore not rely on the indemnity in the lease to avoid liability to the Trust.

Contributory negligence

Between 2000 and 2006 there were intermittent leaks in the stadium roof, for which various repair options were attempted.  In 2006 this issue was referred back to the architect and the consulting engineer, to obtain their recommendation on repair options.  The architect responded with a number of recommendations, one of which included carrying out a visual inspection of the truss welds and support fixings.

Work to deal with the leaks was done between June and December 2006, and this successfully resolved the problems.  A visual inspection was not done, as it was no longer deemed necessary.  The Council claimed that had this been done, the faults would have been picked up, and could have been remedied before the roof collapse.

Justice Dunningham reviewed the law on contributory negligence, saying that:

"For contributory negligence to be established, the usual principles of causation and remoteness apply, so there must be a sufficient connection between the plaintiff's alleged fault and the damage the plaintiff suffered.  It is not essential that the plaintiff's conduct contributes to the event which causes the damage, but simply that it contributes in some way to the damage he or she suffers.  However, 'it is not enough that such act or omission simply provided the opportunity for the occurrence of the loss'.  Secondly, there must be some element of 'moral blameworthiness' in a sense of a 'degree of departure from the standard of the reasonable person' to support a defence of contributory negligence."

She decided that:

"The Trust was not alerted to the prospect that the welding-related construction work may have been defectively carried out and wrongly certified by the Council.  Its failure to undertake an inspection for another purpose that, coincidentally, would have resulted in it discovering this, was no more than a missed opportunity to avoid the occurrence of the loss.  It was not, in the circumstances, negligent."

The Trust was therefore not contributorily negligent.


Having determined that the Council was negligent in issuing the CCC and was liable to the Trust for the cost of rebuilding the stadium, Dunningham J went on to consider the issue of betterment.  She noted that:

"The Courts have regularly had to grapple with the dilemma that, where the plaintiff receives new-for-old, it may be overcompensated and have acquired a benefit at the defendant's expense.  However, to give the plaintiff no more than the depreciated value of the original item which was lost may under-compensate the plaintiff by ignoring the economic burden of having to obtain an immediate and more expensive replacement.  Thus, any deduction for betterment may need to be reduced to take account of any economic cost to the plaintiff of investing in new-for-old at a point in time when it would not otherwise have done so.

Resolving these tensions is highly dependent on the particular facts and circumstances of each case.  Where the plaintiff had 'no reasonable choice but to replace' a damaged building, that may be a factor counting against any significant deduction for betterment.  It is then for the defendant to prove the value and extent of any betterment."

Betterment must always be decided on the facts of the case.  In this case, there was a deduction allowed for betterment to acknowledge that the Trust will incur reduced maintenance costs.

Should GST be added to the judgment amount?

Finally, the judgment considered whether GST should be added to the damages amount awarded against the Council.  The Trust was insured for damage to the stadium, so any damages award from the court would recompense the insurer for the amount already paid to the Trust.

GST is payable in respect of an insurance payment, as set out in section 5(13) of the Goods and Services Tax Act 1985, which provides that:

"... if a registered person receives a payment under a contract of insurance, whether or not the person is a party to the contract, the payment is, to the extent that it relates to a loss incurred in the course or furtherance of the registered person's taxable activity, deemed to be consideration received for a supply of services performed by the registered person"

Justice Dunningham decided that:

"the damages award here does not constitute a taxable supply for GST purposes because there is no reciprocal supply by the other party.  Instead the payment is compensatory in nature and is intended to put right the loss caused by the defendant's negligence."

She went on to say that:

"I consider that the only logical reading of s 5(13) is that it only captures payments made by the insurer to a person entitled to the benefit of the payment, whether or not the recipient is a party to the insurance contract.  While the section specifies... that the recipient of the payment need not be the insured, that does not justify broadening the scope of the clause to encompass payments which are not made by the insurer and which the insured would be entitled to receive independently of the insurance contract.  Put another way, the Trust would be entitled to sue the Council regardless of whether it was insured.  Thus the payment it receives from the Council is not 'under a contract of insurance'... Section 5(13) should be read as encompassing only a payment which an insurer is obliged to make under a contract of insurance, whether or not the recipient is the insured party."

GST is therefore not payable on the damages award.

A copy of the judgment is available here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions