New Zealand: Insurance update - Southland Indoor Leisure Centre Charitable Trust v Invercargill City Council

Last Updated: 7 September 2015
Article by Ayleath Foote

The recent High Court judgment of Southland Indoor Leisure Centre Charitable Trust v Invercargill City Council and others [2015] NZHC 1983 has provided some useful statements on duty of care, contributory negligence, betterment, and GST.


The Southland Indoor Leisure Centre Charitable Trust (Trust) owns and operates Stadium Southland.  Construction of the stadium began in 1999, and was completed in early 2000.  During construction it became apparent that the design of the roof trusses was defective, as they began sagging even while the stadium was being built.  Remedial work was designed, consented, and undertaken during the building programme.

The Invercargill City Council (Council) issued a code compliance certificate (CCC) in November 2000, despite having not received some specific information required under the conditions of the building consent for the remedial work, being confirmation from the consulting engineer that the precamber of the roof trusses is in line with the specifications, and the provision of individual trusses' measurements.  That exact information required was never provided, although other information, showing the height of each roof truss from the floor, which satisfied requirements of the Council, was provided in October 2001.

It transpired from the evidence given in the High Court that the Council's principal building officer had not authorised the issuing of the CCC.  Instead the CCC was issued under the signature of a clerk in the consents team, "possibly because a CCC was required before the Trust could be issued with a liquor licence for an upcoming function in the stadium."

After a heavy snowfall on 18 September 2010, the stadium roof collapsed.  Eight people were inside the stadium at the time, but all escaped unharmed.

There was no dispute in this case over how and why the stadium roof failed.  It was agreed that a "combination of poor quality welding and a failure to follow the plans and specifications for remedial work to the roof trusses meant the roof was unable to carry the snow loadings experienced that day."

The issues for the High Court to determine were whether the Council breached a duty of care to the Trust to exercise reasonable skill and care in issuing the CCC, and if it did, whether the Council should be liable for the repair costs.

Did the Council owe a duty of care?

The Council claimed that this case had a unique factual matrix that should take it outside the circumstances in Body Corporate No 207624 v North Shore City Council [Spencer on Byron] [2012] NZSC 83, [2013] 2 NZLR 297, and that there should be no duty of care.

Justice Dunningham said that:

"In the present case, the issue is whether there are any factors which put the Trust outside the finding in Spencer on Byron which recognised a duty of care 'regardless of the nature of the premises'.  I do not think there are.  The decision in Spencer on Byron was not confined to whether the duty of care owed by building regulators applied to a discrete category of buildings beyond residential homes.  Rather, the question was whether such a duty was owed in respect of all buildings coming under the 1991 Act's regulatory regime."

Justice Dunningham noted that the "relative lack of 'vulnerability' of commercial building developers, as compared with residential home owners" was determined by the Supreme Court in Spencer on Byron to be irrelevant, as "a plaintiff did not have to prove reliance as an element of the tort."

The Council therefore owed a duty of care to the Trust when deciding whether to issue a CCC.

Upon establishing that the duty of care existed, it was clear that it was breached at the time that the CCC was issued, as the evidence had showed that the CCC was not authorised, and the information required by the building consent had not been received.

The Council also suggested that even if it owed a duty of care, it was indemnified by the Trust under a clause in the lease, under which the Council leased the land on which the stadium was built to the Trust.  Justice Dunningham decided that:

"The liability claimed in these proceedings does not arise because the Council owns the land.  The liability arises because the Council is the building regulator under the 1991 Act.  Where the liability arises independently of the contractual relationship, I consider express wording will be required to exclude it because otherwise, read objectively, the lease only governs risks and obligations created by entering into the contract and not those which arise independently from it."

The Council could therefore not rely on the indemnity in the lease to avoid liability to the Trust.

Contributory negligence

Between 2000 and 2006 there were intermittent leaks in the stadium roof, for which various repair options were attempted.  In 2006 this issue was referred back to the architect and the consulting engineer, to obtain their recommendation on repair options.  The architect responded with a number of recommendations, one of which included carrying out a visual inspection of the truss welds and support fixings.

Work to deal with the leaks was done between June and December 2006, and this successfully resolved the problems.  A visual inspection was not done, as it was no longer deemed necessary.  The Council claimed that had this been done, the faults would have been picked up, and could have been remedied before the roof collapse.

Justice Dunningham reviewed the law on contributory negligence, saying that:

"For contributory negligence to be established, the usual principles of causation and remoteness apply, so there must be a sufficient connection between the plaintiff's alleged fault and the damage the plaintiff suffered.  It is not essential that the plaintiff's conduct contributes to the event which causes the damage, but simply that it contributes in some way to the damage he or she suffers.  However, 'it is not enough that such act or omission simply provided the opportunity for the occurrence of the loss'.  Secondly, there must be some element of 'moral blameworthiness' in a sense of a 'degree of departure from the standard of the reasonable person' to support a defence of contributory negligence."

She decided that:

"The Trust was not alerted to the prospect that the welding-related construction work may have been defectively carried out and wrongly certified by the Council.  Its failure to undertake an inspection for another purpose that, coincidentally, would have resulted in it discovering this, was no more than a missed opportunity to avoid the occurrence of the loss.  It was not, in the circumstances, negligent."

The Trust was therefore not contributorily negligent.


Having determined that the Council was negligent in issuing the CCC and was liable to the Trust for the cost of rebuilding the stadium, Dunningham J went on to consider the issue of betterment.  She noted that:

"The Courts have regularly had to grapple with the dilemma that, where the plaintiff receives new-for-old, it may be overcompensated and have acquired a benefit at the defendant's expense.  However, to give the plaintiff no more than the depreciated value of the original item which was lost may under-compensate the plaintiff by ignoring the economic burden of having to obtain an immediate and more expensive replacement.  Thus, any deduction for betterment may need to be reduced to take account of any economic cost to the plaintiff of investing in new-for-old at a point in time when it would not otherwise have done so.

Resolving these tensions is highly dependent on the particular facts and circumstances of each case.  Where the plaintiff had 'no reasonable choice but to replace' a damaged building, that may be a factor counting against any significant deduction for betterment.  It is then for the defendant to prove the value and extent of any betterment."

Betterment must always be decided on the facts of the case.  In this case, there was a deduction allowed for betterment to acknowledge that the Trust will incur reduced maintenance costs.

Should GST be added to the judgment amount?

Finally, the judgment considered whether GST should be added to the damages amount awarded against the Council.  The Trust was insured for damage to the stadium, so any damages award from the court would recompense the insurer for the amount already paid to the Trust.

GST is payable in respect of an insurance payment, as set out in section 5(13) of the Goods and Services Tax Act 1985, which provides that:

"... if a registered person receives a payment under a contract of insurance, whether or not the person is a party to the contract, the payment is, to the extent that it relates to a loss incurred in the course or furtherance of the registered person's taxable activity, deemed to be consideration received for a supply of services performed by the registered person"

Justice Dunningham decided that:

"the damages award here does not constitute a taxable supply for GST purposes because there is no reciprocal supply by the other party.  Instead the payment is compensatory in nature and is intended to put right the loss caused by the defendant's negligence."

She went on to say that:

"I consider that the only logical reading of s 5(13) is that it only captures payments made by the insurer to a person entitled to the benefit of the payment, whether or not the recipient is a party to the insurance contract.  While the section specifies... that the recipient of the payment need not be the insured, that does not justify broadening the scope of the clause to encompass payments which are not made by the insurer and which the insured would be entitled to receive independently of the insurance contract.  Put another way, the Trust would be entitled to sue the Council regardless of whether it was insured.  Thus the payment it receives from the Council is not 'under a contract of insurance'... Section 5(13) should be read as encompassing only a payment which an insurer is obliged to make under a contract of insurance, whether or not the recipient is the insured party."

GST is therefore not payable on the damages award.

A copy of the judgment is available here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.