New Zealand: Local Goverment Bulletin II

Local Government Law Reform Bill – Lump Sum Contributions

One of the Acts proposed for amendment by the recently introduced Local Government Law Reform Bill (Number 4) is the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 (LGRA).

On the minor side, an amendment to section 29 and new section 41A will clarify that challenges to the valuation of a rating unit must be brought under the Rating Valuations Act 1998 (ie not as an objection to the LGRA rating information database). Where such a challenge is successful, section 41A will require local authorities to issue an amended rates assessment.

The more significant changes, including an entirely new Part 4A, seek to establish a new local authority funding tool – ‘lump sum contributions’ (LSC regime).

With limited political comment on the proposed LSC regime to date, it is difficult to identify the drivers behind this attempt to introduce the idea. In 1999, a discussion document of the then National government – A Future Direction for Local Government Funding Powers – included the suggestion that:

Councils could be given limited powers to shift the liability to pay rates across time through ... a general power ... for councils, at their discretion, to form policies to allow ratepayers the option to pay lump sums ‘up front’ or to defer payment of rates. Such policies would have to include appropriate discount or interest rates.

The concept of lump sum contributions was not carried into the 2002 legislative reforms. Nor was the idea part of the Local Government Law Reform Bill (Number 3) package, about which the New Zealand First Party commented in 2004:

Also surprising was the inability to accept the submission made by the Marlborough District Council amending the Local Government Rating Act 2002, clarifying the ability for a council to fund localised projects by lump sum contributions.

New Zealand First intends to pursue the ability of Marlborough and other local authorities to be able to establish lump sum regimes by the preparation of a Private Member’s Bill.

It is therefore possible that the inclusion of a LSC regime in this Local Government Law Reform Bill springs from New Zealand First’s coalition deal with Labour.

How will lump sum contributions work?

The LSC regime is designed as a funding tool for specific capital projects, although local authorities will not be able to compel ratepayers to make lump sum contributions, so it is perhaps better thought of as a variety of targeted rate. The essential features of the regime are:

1. It may only be used to fund capital projects (ie not opex).

2. First, a ‘funding plan’ must be adopted as part of (or an amendment to) a local authority’s LTCCP.

3. The requirements of a funding plan will be set out in a new schedule 3A, and include:

3.1 A description of the capital project to be funded, together with estimates of its timeframe, cost, and the split between lump sum contributions and targeted rates.

3.2 The category of rating units that will be liable to pay the lump sum contribution/targeted rate (ie the class of ‘eligible ratepayers’).

3.3 How the lump sum contributions and targeted rates will be calculated, and (if necessary) recalculated upon completion of the project.

3.4 What matters the local authority must be satisfied of before proceeding with the project (including any minimum level of lump sum contributions).

4. Once adopted, a funding plan locks in a local authority’s funding decision and it may not fund the same project except in accordance with that plan (practically, funding plans will need to incorporate sufficient flexibility to avoid the need to change the plan itself by amending the LTCCP using the special consultative procedure).

5. After a funding plan is in place, the second stage is to invite eligible ratepayers to make a lump sum contribution. The requirements of this invitation will also be set out in schedule 3A. An LSC regime invitation can be compared to the publication of an investment statement: it must fully inform eligible ratepayers about the decision to either (a) elect to pay a lump sum contribution; or (b) pay targeted rates over a period of time.

6. Ratepayers then have a minimum of one month to complete the third stage: electing whether to pay a lump sum contribution or not. Once made, that election will run with the land, and unpaid lump sum contributions can be recovered as a debt.

How will lump sum contributions be used?

Local authorities can already recover the cost of infrastructure assets from a limited class of ratepayers under sections 16-18 of the LGRA. A fixed rate per rating unit can be assessed on categories of rateable land defined by the ‘provision or availability to the land of a service provided by, or on behalf of, the local authority’. Given this existing power, and that the LSC regime will not allow compulsory lump sum contributions, a question exists over what role the regime is intended to play.

Perhaps the most likely LSC regime scenario is for the funding of infrastructure upgrades that will benefit a very specific class of rating units (for instance a road servicing a remote community). In the absence of another adequate funding source (such as development contributions under the Local Government Act 2002), or the political will to fund such an upgrade through borrowing to be recovered by a subsequent targeted rate, a funding plan could be adopted that:

  • Allowed community members to elect between paying a lump sum contribution or a targeted rate; but
  • Set a high threshold of lump sum contributions before the project would be undertaken.

Although somewhat of an ultimatum (and possibly politically untenable as a consequence), this type of funding plan would provide communities with a very transparent choice: either forego the infrastructure upgrade, or collectively fund a portion of the required capex up front. Those unable to pay a lump sum contribution would become liable for a targeted rate of equivalent economic value to be paid over time.

Difficulties and observations

Aside from the type of scenario detailed above, it is difficult to identify situations where the LSC regime will prove useful. Human nature (and the fact that property may later be sold) suggests that without some tangible benefit, most ratepayers will not elect to pay a lump sum contribution. Although this could be overcome by discounting the lump sum contribution, proposed section 11 7B(4) provides:

In developing a funding plan, a local authority must give equal weight to the financial interests of those ratepayers who may elect to make a lump sum contribution and those who may decide not to do so.

Thus it will be arguably impossible for local authorities to ‘sweeten the deal’.

Potential difficulties with the Bill’s drafting include:

  • The lack of clarity around how Part 4A will link to the existing LGRA provisions dealing with targeted rates. For instance, the class of ratepayer liable for the alternative of targeted rates must include all eligible ratepayers who elect not to pay a lump sum contribution. Proposed clause (d) in part 1 of schedule 3A does not make clear whether these classes must be defined by the limited categories of land for setting targeted rates under section 17/schedule 2 of the LGRA.
  • Nor is it clear whether targeted rates under the proposed Part 4A will count towards the 30% cap under section 21 of the LGRA.
  • The Bill also permits argument over whether an unpaid lump sum contribution will be secured as a charge on the rating unit (as is the case for rates).


Although some local authorities may welcome the LSC regime as a useful way of negotiating the funding of specific infrastructure projects with communities of interest, at first blush it seems unlikely to become a common funding tool.

It is more likely that growth-related capex projects will be funded from development contributions, which have proved to be a powerful tool enabling local authorities to require the costs of development to be internalised. On the other had, infrastructure upgrades/improved levels of service are regularly funded through borrowing, which can be recovered from benefiting rating units by targeted rates.

The LSC regime will be most useful where the business case for borrowing to construct or upgrade a piece of infrastructure is weak, but the wheel is nevertheless squeaky.

Court Endorses Council Failure To Comply With Statutory Timeframe – For Now...

Administrative delays and prolonged processing periods have become de rigueur complaints for opponents of the Resource Management Act 1991.

The issue has now emerged in the building field, with the High Court in Williams & Co Trustees Ltd v Selwyn District Council (22 March 2006) being asked to consider whether Selwyn District Council had been remiss in knowingly exceeding the Building Act 2004’s 20 working day timeframe for processing building consent applications. The resulting decision will cause territorial authorities to breath a sigh of relief, yet it also sounds a warning bell for those making little headway towards complying with their statutory obligations.

The applicant involved applied for building consent to construct a residential dwelling on 7 December 2005. It was common ground that, after several requests for further information, the 20 working day period for processing the application (set out in s48 of the Building Act 2004) expired on 17 February 2006. In response to a query from the applicant, the Council gave a written indication that the application was likely to be processed sometime in mid- March. Frustrated by the forecast delay, the applicant applied to the Court for an order forcing the Council to issue the consent forthwith.

In considering the request, Chisholm J acknowledged both the legitimate frustration of the applicant, and the very real resource problems experienced by the Council – a factor made worse by the gradual disappearance of private building certifiers since 2004. However, he found that three of the four factors affecting his decision favoured the Council. These were:

  • The failure to comply with the statutory timeframe was not a wilful failure – the problems experienced by the Council in complying with its statutory obligations were genuine.
  • By granting the order sought, the Court would open the floodgates to hundreds of similar requests.
  • There was a strong likelihood that the particular consent application in question would be processed in a matter of days in any event.

This last factor was determinative in Chisholm J’s handling of the case, which was adjourned for a number of days in which time the Council was expected to process the consent application. Although the matter was therefore not finally decided, Chisholm J indicated that the floodgates argument weighed strongly in his mind and that other people in the position of the applicant should not be encouraged to issue proceedings. However, he also served a warning to territorial authorities struggling to process building consent applications within the statutory timeframe:

... the Council should not construe the outcome as a signal that all is well. It cannot fail to comply with its statutory obligations indefinitely and the time will come when the arguments presented in this case no longer carry any weight. Put another way, the Council must maintain its momentum in addressing this problem.

Accordingly, the decision does not justify a cavalier attitude on the part of the territorial authorities towards statutory timeframes. Rather, it indicates that the Courts will not continue to tolerate failures to comply with statutory obligations indefinitely, even though the circumstances leading to such failures may be beyond the control of territorial authorities. The message for territorial authorities is clear – the Courts will extend some leniency while adjustments are made to accommodate the new statutory regime, however the honeymoon period won’t last forever. Quite where the line will be drawn is unclear – however, it appears that time is most definitely of the essence.

Bylaws Levying Waste Collectors Ultra Vires And Invalid, But Regulating Through Licensing Regime Valid

Waste Management NZ and Carter Holt Harvey successfully challenged the validity of North Shore, Rodney, Waitakere, and Christchurch City Councils’ waste levy bylaws enacted last year.

The bylaws gave the Councils power to impose waste levies on companies that were licensed to collect, dispose, and/or transport waste in its districts for the purposes of funding general waste management strategies. The High Court found that the bylaws effectively purported to give Councils the power to tax. Taxes can only be lawfully levied if there is statutory authority to do so. Both the Local Government Acts (1974 and 2002) only give Councils powers to enact bylaws to recover costs connected to the use of its waste facilities, or in implementing its waste management plans. Neither act gives Councils general powers to tax. For these reasons the Court found that the bylaws were ultra vires and unreasonable and were quashed.

The Court accepted, however, that the Councils had powers under the Local Government Act 1974 to institute licensing regimes to monitor and regulate the collection and transportation of waste by waste operators, and to charge and receive licensing fees while doing so. The licensing regimes also made unlicensed collection or transportation of waste an offence under the Councils’ bylaws.

Carter Holt’s appeal was partly dismissed as it attempted to exclude its paper recycling activities from the licensing regimes, but the Court considered that the meaning of waste included materials that could be recycled and reused.

Wellington City Council V Mcbride And Currington, High Court, Wellington, 17 February 2006, CRI2005-485,144-147, Gendall J

This case related to the correct interpretation of an aspect of the Traffic Regulations 1976 (before they were largely repealed). It was about whether a pay and display machine is a ‘parking meter’. The High Court (overturning the District Court’s finding on this issue) found that a pay and display machine is a ‘parking meter’.

The significance of this finding is that prescribed signage is not required to indicate the extent of a pay and display area because under the Traffic Regulations, signage was not required where the parks are regulated by ‘parking meters’.

This interpretation will have some application under the Traffic Control Devices Rules 2004 (which replaces the Traffic Regulations in terms of signage requirements) as the Rules still provide an exemption for signage where parking meters are located ‘, or adjacent to, each parking space’.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.