New Zealand: Arbitration clauses and summary judgment: what to do when you don't think there is a dispute

Last Updated: 26 January 2015
Article by Jeremy Johnson


Arbitration clauses are increasingly used in commercial agreements and in leases. One question that often arises in situations where there is an arbitration clause is what claimants should be doing when it does not think the defendant has a defence? Usually the claimants have proceeded to Court under the summary judgment procedure1; however the Supreme Court in Zurich Australian Insurance Limited t/a Zurich New Zealand v Cognition Education Limited2 has now closed off this option.

The decision will have significant practical implications for parties. The summary jurisdiction is not often used in arbitrations and the reasons for that appear to be both principled and practical.

Nevertheless there are good reasons – both in terms of principle and practicality - why clients might want to have access to a summary jurisdiction and there are ways that this can be achieved – namely by allowing for it in the arbitration clause itself.

What did the decision say?

The Zurich Australian Insurance Limited v Cognition Education Limited case involved a contract frustration insurance policy between Zurich (the insurer) and Cognition (the insured). That policy contained an arbitration clause.

Cognition made a claim under the policy which Zurich declined to pay. Cognition then applied for summary judgment (presumably because of confidence in its case). In response Zurich filed an appearance objecting to the jurisdiction of the Court and sought a stay of the proceeding under Article 8(1) of schedule 1 of the Arbitration Act 1996.

Article 8(1) of schedule 1 is key to this case. That article says:

Arbitration agreement substantive claim before court

The court before which proceedings are brought in a matter which is the subject of an arbitration agreement shall, if the parties so request not later than when submitting that party's first statement on the substance of the dispute, stay those proceedings and refer the parties to arbitration unless if finds that the agreement is null and void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed, or that there is not in fact any dispute between the parties with regard to the matters agreed to be referred.

The question before the Supreme Court was summarised at paragraph [10] of that judgment where the Court said it needed to assess the final words in Article 8(1) which gives the Court the power not grant a stay where "it finds...that there is not in fact any dispute between the parties with regard to the matters agreed to be referred"

Two interpretations were put forward. The first was for the Court to find there was no "dispute" then it must be satisfied there was no reasonably arguable defence – which would mean the Court could grant summary judgment even though there was an arbitration clause. The second interpretation advanced was that for the Court to find there was no "dispute" meant it had to be satisfied that any dispute raised was not "bona fide".

The Supreme Court described the competing interpretations as the "broad and narrow tests".3 It preferred the narrow test. Accordingly where an arbitration agreement covers the relationship between the parties they can no longer apply for summary judgment.

What are the practical implications of this?

What then are claimants to do when it considers the defence is either extremely weak or is not genuine? First unless it is obvious that any dispute raised is not bona fide then you should proceed to the court. In cases where there has simply been no reply then parties should probably proceed to the court anyway; it is difficult to imagine a court that would say a recently raised dispute after considerable correspondence was in fact "bona fide" and that a court would then refer the matter to arbitration. Even if it did so the risk of an adverse costs award would be low.

However, if the case is simply weak, then the dispute resolution process set out in the relevant agreement should be commenced as soon as possible. But, are there ways to short-cut that process through a summary judgment type procedure?

The answer to that would appear to be 'no'. That is because arbitrations generally do not allow for interlocutory applications or summary procedures (especially internationally); as Williams & Kawharu note "[a] recurring criticism of arbitration is that there is no efficient method for the early disposal of meritless claims.4

Why is that? One reason may be that it is a matter of principle – arbitrators are afraid of breaching the requirements for natural justice and having any award set aside by the Court later. One of the requirements of natural justice in the arbitration context is said to be "the hearing must, unless the contrary is expressly agreed, be the occasion on which the parties present the whole of their evidence and argument".5

The idea of a potential two stage process, with a summary hearing and, if that failed, a full hearing would, on that basis, appear to need to be specifically agreed.6 However there should be no objection to that – after all the provisions of the Arbitration Act itself (namely Articles 18 and 24 of Schedule 2) mean that the parties are free to agree whether or not to have a hearing at all. Provided there is agreement between the parties that should remove the risk of any award been set aside in the event a summary procedure is used.

The second reason why arbitrators may have been reluctant to exercise a summary jurisdiction is because "add ons" and procedural complexity – such as multiple hearings - undermine one of the advantages of arbitration – namely it can be a "relatively quick, simple, and confidential method of resolving their disputes."7

How then should parties approach this issue? First, it must be said that there are benefits to a summary procedure. It does allow parties to quickly resolve a dispute where one party is very confident in their case. There is no reason in principle why that should be available to the Court but not to arbitrators.

There are also practical cost and time savings for the parties and there is no reason why a party that is particularly confident of its case should not have the right to effectively "take the risk" and see whether its case is as strong as it believes or the other side's case is as weak as it believes.

In saying that, there are questions as to whether summary judgment procedure would in fact add much in arbitration. Practically speaking most arbitrations proceed with evidence on the papers with cross examination and oral submissions (as do most Court hearings now). If there is, in fact, no reasonably arguable defence then it is difficult to see how a full hearing would be that much longer or more expensive than a partial one.

Further the primary purpose of the summary jurisdiction is to enable a 'short-cut'. Given that arbitrations are generally swifter than the Court process without the summary jurisdiction it is difficult to see what is gained.

What should parties do?

The best way for parties to deal with this issue is up front in the arbitration clause. Those drafting arbitration clauses for parties should discuss with them whether or not they want to have summary judgment or strike out available to them after considering the practical benefits. Provision could be made in the arbitration clause in a way similar to the following:

The parties agree that any arbitrator appointed under this clause has the jurisdiction to determine an application for summary judgment or for strike-out in the same manner as a judge of the High Court and following the same procedure set out in the High Court Rules. The timeframes for the making of any such application will be set by the arbitrator.

This would appear to resolve the objection to the exercise of a summary jurisdiction by arbitrators on the basis of principle; the parties agreeing to it up front means that no party can be denied natural justice when they are simply being held to the bargain they have already made. As for practicality such a clause leaves that in the hands of the parties at the time.


1The summary judgment procedure allows the Court to grant judgment after a short hearing where there is "no reasonably arguable defence".
2Zurich Australian Insurance Limited t/a Zurich New Zealand v Cognition Education Limited [2014] NZSC 188.
3Zurich Australian Insurance Limited t/a Zurich New Zealand v Cognition Education Limited [2014] NZSC188 at [10].
4D Williams & A Kawharu, Williams & Kawharu on Arbitration (LexisNexis, Wellington, 2011) at 304 and Walker, C T "International arbitration: return to Eden?" [2008] NZLJ 301 at 302
5Trustees of Rotoaira Forest Trust v Attorney General [1999] 2 NZLR 452 citing Mustill and Boyd, Law and Practice of Commercial Arbitration in England (2nd ed, Butterworths, London 1989) at [3] p 301
6Although that must be questionable – the requirement appears to be directed more towards communications with the tribunal outside of the hearing itself.
7C T Walker "International arbitration: return to Eden?" [2008] NZLJ 301 at 303

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Jeremy Johnson
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions