New Zealand: Statutory demand procedure available to liquidators to collect voidable transactions

The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Damien Grant and Stephen Khov v Lotus Gardens Limited [2014] NZCA 127 overturns a High Court decision which held that liquidators could not use the statutory demand process to collect monies under transactions that had been set aside under the voidable transaction provisions of the Companies Act 1993 (the "Act").

The Court of Appeal held that s 295 of the Act is not the only process available to liquidators to recover transactions that have been set aside. Section 295 of the Act sets out the various discretionary orders a Court can make following a transaction being set aside.

Despite some media commentary suggesting otherwise, the implications of this decision for creditors are not significant, as the considerations under s 295 and the defence under s 296 will still be available, regardless of the procedure a liquidator adopts. That said, in some cases, liquidators may well use this option as it will be procedurally simpler.

The Facts

Damien Grant and Stephen Khov were appointed as liquidators of Quantum Grow Ltd on 20 March 2012. The liquidators investigated payments by Quantum Grow Ltd to a related company, Lotus Gardens Ltd, and identified $25,576.88 worth of payments they considered to be insolvent transactions under s 292. The liquidators wrote to Lotus Gardens asking what the payments were for on three occasions in May, July and September 2012 and received no response.

On 15 October 2012 a notice to set aside a voidable transaction under s 294 was served on Lotus Gardens. Lotus Gardens did not raise an objection within the 20 working day timeframe required under the Act.

The liquidators wrote to Lotus Gardens on 15 November 2010 pointing out that no objection had been received, that the transactions had been automatically set aside and making demand for $25,576.88. The letter warned that if no payment was received the liquidators would initiate proceedings in the High Court confirming that the transactions were set aside. Again Lotus Gardens did not respond.

At this stage the liquidators declined to follow the "usual" procedure under s 295 and rather issued a statutory demand under s 289. The demand recorded an indebtedness of Lotus Gardens to the liquidators of Quantum Grow Ltd (in liquidation) in the sum of $25,576.88 for non-payment of voided transactions. It required that sum to be paid within 15 working days of the service of the notice.

Lotus Gardens did not apply to set aside the statutory demand nor make payment under it. Accordingly, the liquidators then filed a notice of proceeding and statement of claim to put Lotus Gardens into liquidation.

On 8 February 2013 Lotus Gardens filed an application for leave to extend the time for filing a statement of defence and leave to appear. Leave was granted and a statement of defence filed. That defence relied on, amongst other things, that (a) a debt can only arise on an order under s 295; and (b) in any event, Lotus Gardens was merely a conduit for funds paid by Quantum in reduction of its debt to BNZ. The liquidation application was heard in the High Court on 10 April 2013.

The High Court held that the liquidators had followed a procedure that was unavailable to them when attempting to recover the voidable transactions. That decision was appealed by the liquidators.

The Court of Appeal decision

The Court of Appeal overturned the High Court decision and held that while s 295 is the usual process, it was not the only method a liquidator could use to obtain orders to set transactions aside.

The Court of Appeal did not agree with the High Court that the Act had effected a significant change in the liquidators' ability to recover monies paid under a set-aside transaction. The Court said that, although under the Companies Act 1955 the test was intention-based rather than effects-based, there was still a procedure in place whereby a liquidator could initiate a setting aside and, if no steps had been taken within the statutory timeframe, the transaction was set aside by operation of the statute.

Ultimately, the Court agreed with the central planks of the liquidators' argument; those being (a) where a transaction is set aside under s 294 due to a failure to object within the required timeframe, the creditor automatically comes under an obligation to repay the sum demanded; and (b) notwithstanding s 295, there are common law rules that remain in force which have the effect that, upon a setting aside under s 294, obligations come into effect without requiring a court order1.

The Court was of the view that Parliament expressly contemplated a court ordering recovery of property that was the subject of a voidable transaction through processes other than those set out in the Act by use of the express words in s 296(3).

The Court looked at the purposes of the Act which, among others, were to provide for straight-forward and fair procedures for realising the dispersed assets of insolvent companies. On applying the purposive approach to interpretation the Court said there was no reason why an order under s 295 should be treated as the exclusive method for a liquidator to obtain an order following a setting aside. Moreover, the Court considered that s 295 did not use exclusive or mandatory language excluding any other remedy.

In coming to this conclusion the Court considered its broad discretion to set aside a statutory demand under s 290. They held that if the claim of the liquidators is outweighed by some factor making it plainly unjust for liquidation to ensue then no liquidation would be ordered. If there was a receipt of the property where the conditions of s 296(3) arguably could be made out, then the court would refuse to make an order. Further, if there were factors that might lead a court to decline to make an order for payment of the sum sought under s 295 of the Act, or in the alternative for some different order to be made, then that could also be a consideration that would persuade a court to refuse to liquidate the company under s 290.

Turning to the facts, it was then held that there was no arguable defence that the payments to Lotus Gardens were as a conduit. Therefore, it did not consider the statutory demand should be set aside. The Court of Appeal concurred with the High Court that a defence under s 296(3) was not available to Lotus Gardens and accordingly an order for liquidation of Lotus Gardens was made.

Implications of the Court of Appeal decision

While the procedure a liquidator can use to recover transactions that have been set aside has been widened by the Court of Appeal's decision, the relevant considerations open to the court in making such an order have not.

A party subject to an alternative process cannot be placed in a worse substantive position because the liquidator has chosen an unorthodox recovery route. The considerations under s 295 and s 296(3) will still be open to and relevant to the court's decision regardless of the procedure a liquidator chooses to recover the transaction.

The timeframes for responding to set aside a statutory demand or file a notice of opposition to a s 295 application are the same - ten working days.

Importantly, the Judges in Court of Appeal noted2 that they did not wish to be seen as encouraging the use of the statutory demand processes as a remedy for liquidators claiming recovery for set aside transactions. They went on to say that the s 295 procedure is designed to deal with remedies following setting aside and it is good practice to utilise that section. In doing so, the Court of Appeal sounded a warning to liquidators who use the statutory demand procedure that they could well find that they have taken an unnecessary step and are faced with a Court that refuses to make an order for liquidation. That would leave them facing costs and still having to apply under s 295, having wasted creditors' funds on an unnecessary step.


1Westpac Banking Corporation v Nangeela Properties Limited [1986] 2 NZLR 1 (CA); McKinnon v Falla Holdings NZ Limited (in liq) (1999) 8 NZCLC 262.

2Grant & Khov v Lotus Gardens Limited [2014] NZCA 127 at [46]

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.