New Zealand: Security agreements signed just before liquidation: is the Personal Property Securities Act the answer?

Last Updated: 30 June 2011
Article by Michael Arthur

It is not uncommon for a receiver, liquidator or competing creditor to be presented with a security agreement, the ink on which appears scarcely to be dry.

If that secured creditor registered on the Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR) months or years earlier, does that registration date determine priority between competing security interests?  Or is that unfair to other creditors?

In a  recent case, the High Court dealt with the dilemma by ignoring established Personal Property Securities Act (PPSA) rules and instead giving priority to the interest which was perfected first.

This decision turns the PPSA on its head and was in our view unnecessary.  Any injustice could have been addressed by applying the insolvent transactions regime.

The Healy Holmberg Trading Partnership v Grant1

Healy Holmberg, a secured creditor, had registered on the PPSR two years before liquidation.  But, according to the evidence, its security agreements had been executed just months before liquidation (and possibly even after the liquidation had started).

A security agreement is invalid if it was executed by the directors after either receivership or liquidation.  The directors of the debtor company would have had no authority to enter into such a commitment at that time. 

Three main questions to consider in this situation

  • Was the security agreement executed after receivership or liquidation?
  • If not, what priority does it have under the PPSA?
  • Does the security agreement fall under the insolvent transactions regime?

Was the security agreement executed after receivership or liquidation?

On receiving a suspiciously fresh security agreement, a receiver or liquidator should look to obtain as much evidence as possible about when the agreement was executed.  This includes:

  • originals of the agreement
  • emails referring to the date of execution, and
  • electronic copies of the agreement and its drafts, in order to check whether the electronic files' metadata is consistent with the stated execution date.

The liquidators in Healy Holmberg  suspected that the agreements may have been executed after liquidation and backdated, and made a smart move in getting the police to forensically test the documents. 

Although the police were unable to confirm that the agreements had been executed post-liquidation, they did conclude they had been backdated.  In the absence of the secured party being able to explain the dating inconsistencies, the Court found that the security agreements had probably been executed after the date of liquidation, although that appears not to have been a conclusive finding, given that the witnesses had not given oral evidence.

Ranking an agreement signed before receivership or liquidation

The liquidators successfully argued that, had Healy Holmberg's security agreements been signed before liquidation, priority should be determined by the order in which the creditors perfected their security interests.  Healy Holmberg's earlier registration was ineffective until the agreement was in fact signed, and credit given.  The Court found that the competing creditor (RIGA) had priority over Healy Holmberg because RIGA's security agreement had been executed first, and was therefore perfected first.

That argument, if accepted more widely, would turn the PPSA on its head.  It would mean that no secured creditor could rely on the register.  In every case there would need to be a detailed examination of when perfection occurred, which is not a date that is ascertainable from the register itself.

The Court ought to have applied the ordinary PPSA priority rules.  As at the date of liquidation, both Healy Holmberg's and RIGA's security interests were perfected.  Priority between two perfected security interests is determined by which party registered on the PPSR first - not by which security interest was perfected first.

Healy Holmberg ought to have had priority.  It did not matter that its interest was perfected after the other creditor perfected.  Registration is what matters.

The Court in Healy Holmberg  clearly perceived an injustice in giving priority to a recent security agreement over one executed much earlier. 

Chapman Tripp commentary

We believe that the Court's analysis was incorrect.

There is no injustice in a lender registering early and documenting security agreements days, months or even years down the line. 

Before lending, a financier should search the PPSR for security interests registered against the collateral of the debtor company.

If the search shows that another security interest is registered, the financier knows that it will always be at risk that later lending by the prior-registered creditor will take priority unless: (1) the other registration is removed, (2) it is limited to collateral in which the new financier seeks no interest, or (3) a priority agreement is entered into.

The system enables a financier to register on one day, and finalise the lending transaction the following, day, week or month, confident that the priority position has been set by registration. 

If priority between perfected security interests was determined by who perfected first, that certainty would disappear.  Priority would be determined by identifying which party was the first to have its agreement executed, provide value, have the debtor obtain rights in the collateral and register.  Complex investigations would be required.  Even ascertaining the date of an agreement can be very difficult (as illustrated by this case).  Lenders would become far more cautious as a result.2

We understand that the decision is on its way to the Court of Appeal.

Enter the insolvent transactions regime

The perceived injustice in the Healy Holmberg case is best addressed through the insolvent transactions regime, and not by misconstruing the PPSA priority rules. 

In Healy Holmberg, the police evidence showed that the security agreements in question were executed no earlier than nine months before liquidation.  The agreements could probably therefore have been set aside because they took place in the "specified" period of two years before liquidation started.  Had the liquidators adopted this approach, they would have needed to show only that:

  • immediately after the security agreement was entered into, the company was unable to pay its due debts (the actual date of execution is key here – the PPSR registration date is irrelevant), and
  • the security agreements were not given to secure new credit.

An early PPSR registration would not have saved Healy Holmberg's position had the liquidators taken that approach.  Registration sets priority.  It does not save a later agreement from being voidable.

Our thanks to Janko Marcetic, Solicitor, for writing this Brief Counsel.

For further information, please contact the lawyers featured.


  1. (Unreported) 24 February 2011, Auckland High Court, CIV-2009-404-2279.
  2. For more detailed analysis, see Professor Mike Gedye's article "First to perfect?" in [2011] NZLJ 123.  ​

The information in this article is for informative purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. Please contact Chapman Tripp for advice tailored to your situation.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Michael Arthur
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions