Isle of Man: Security For Costs – An Update

Last Updated: 28 October 2015
Article by David Wozniak


In the recent decision of Prest ("Mr Prest") v Pretrodel Resources Limited (in Liquidation) ("Petrodel")1 His Honour Deemster Corlett reviewed the Manx law on Security for Costs, where an application was brought before the court under Rule 7.28 of the Rules of Court of Justice of the Isle of Man. 

The Court Rule and the Court's Discretion

The court has a wide discretion to grant a defendant security for costs under Rule 7.28(1)2. It may grant an order for Security for Costs if:

(a) it is satisfied, having regard to all the circumstances of the case that it is just to make such an order and

(b) either;

i. one or more of the conditions in paragraph (2) of Rule 7.28 applies, or

ii. or an enactment permits the court to require Security for Costs. 

2. The conditions are-

(a) the claimant is ordinarily resident out of the jurisdiction;

(b) the claimant is a company or other body (whether incorporated in or outside the Island) and there is reason to believe that it will be unable to pay the defendant's costs if ordered to do so;

(c) the claimant has changed his address since the claim was commenced with a view to evading the consequences of the litigation;

(d) the claimant failed to give his address in the claim form, or gave an incorrect address in that form;

(e) the claimant is acting as a nominal claimant, other than as a representative claimant under Chapter 6 of Part 3, and there is reason to believe that he will be unable to pay the defendant's costs if ordered to do so;

(f) the claimant has taken steps in relation to his assets that would make it difficult to enforce an order for costs against him.

The wording in of Rule 7.28(2) is similar to the equivalent rule under the UK Civil Procedure Rules3 save that a defendant can be granted security for costs under Rule 25.12 if the claimant is (i) resident out of the jurisdiction; but (ii) not resident in a Brussels Contracting State, a State bound by the Lugano Convention or a Regulation State, as defined in section 1(3) of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982. The Lugano Convention does not apply to the Isle of Man nor is it a Regulation State.

Deemster Corlett determined that the pre-requisite, in Rule 7.28(2)(a), was satisfied as Mr Prest was ordinarily a resident out of the jurisdiction of the Isle of Man. At the time of this judgment, Mr Prest was resident in Sienna (Italy) but he also appeared to have addresses in Abuja (Nigeria), in Nevis, and Monaco and also London.

The underlying case which Mr Prest brought before the Manx court was a claim that assets were his, which he said the Liquidator held on trust for him.

Deemster Corlett cited and relied upon Akhavan v Quinn Legal Advocates Limited 20134  as the leading case in the Isle of Man on security for costs5.

The Relevant Law

Deemster Corlett referred to two English decisions in Nasser v United Bank of Kuwait6 and De Beer v Kannar& Co7. These cases examine the courts approach when assessing the amount of costs to be awarded in an order for Security for Costs.

The White Book8 refers to Nasser9 and says that:

"... a reasonable estimate of the applicant's likely costs in Nasser up to the end of the proceedings was £10,000. However, there was no obstacle to or difficulty about the enforcement of an order for costs other than impecuniosity. Therefore, it was appropriate to limit the amount of security to the amount needed to protect the applicant from the extra burden in terms of costs and delay which was likely to be involved in seeking to enforce an order for costs in the country in which the claimant resided (the USA)."

Costs in the Nasser case were assessed in the sum of £5,000 and an order for security was made for that amount.

At paragraphs 189 and 190 of Nasser, Walker J in stated that:

"... the court should consider tailoring the order to the particular circumstances: if there is likely to be no difficulty about enforcement, but simply an extra burden in the form of costs or moderate delay, the appropriate course could well be to limit the amount of the security ordered by reference to that potential burden."

In contrast, the White Book comments that in the Court of Appeal decision of De Beer v Kannar& Co10 (the "de Beer case"):

"... a reasonable estimate of the applicant's costs up to the end of the proceedings in question was £130,000. There was evidence that the claimant had sufficient assets out of which he could pay such costs not only in Switzerland but also in the USA. However, the court was satisfied that (i) there was a lack of probity on the part of the claimant in these proceedings (ii) the claimant's assets in Switzerland were assets which could easily be moved, and (iii) there was a risk that an order for costs against them would be difficult or even impossible to enforce in the USA. In the circumstances, the amount of security which it was appropriate to award was £130,000."

Deemster Corlett11 stated that in Kazakhstan Kagazyplc v Zhunus12 it was emphasised that "the Court should not make orders which are discriminatory to Articles 6 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights".

Thus, in light of these two contrasting cases there is clearly a need for the courts to assess the amount of costs to be awarded in an order for security based on the individual merits of each case.


In determing whether to grant security for costs to Petrodel, Deemster Corlett considered, in particular, the followings factors:

  1. Mr Prest was alleging in Nigerian proceedings that the assets of the companies were held on trust for his siblings.
  2. Mr Prest had not paid an earlier costs order in related proceedings and faced the potential of imprisonment because of non-payment of maintenance to Mrs Prest.
  3. The Liquidator was acting essentially for the creditors of Pretrodel and their interests needed to be in the forefront of the Court's mind.
  4. The company was wound up on August 1 2013. It was a substantial insolvency and the assets should be available prima facie to pay the creditors.
  5. Mr Prest claimed that as a result of the English Supreme Court ruling on June 12 201313 the assets of Petrodel were in fact held on trust for him. If that was the case, the creditors would lose out substantially as there would have been no assets available to pay them.
  6. The security should not be limited to the costs of enforcement in the five relevant jurisdictions, but should instead reflect the amount of the Liquidator's assessed costs if he were to be successful.
  7. The whole point of security for costs is to protect a defendant who is obliged to litigate at the election of a claimant.
  8. Mr Prest seemed likely to do all within his power to avoid paying the Liquidator's assessed costs from any available assets.

This concluded with Deemster Corlett ordered Mr Prest to pay into court the sum of £125,000 plus VAT, i.e. £150,000.


Where a claimant opposes the making of an order for security for costs or seeks to limit the amount of security, the onus is on them to put forward sufficient evidence before the court, and in doing so, to make full and frank disclosure of their financial resources. 

If a claimant gives an incomplete account of their financial resources, the court may, in exercising its discretion, set an amount which represents the court's best estimate of what the claimant can reasonably afford. 


1  Prest v. Pretrodel Resources (unreported) Deemster Corlett's Judgment, Chancery Division, August 13 2015 

2  Steele v. Paz Limited (in liquidation) and Others 1993 - 95 MLR 102 (CHD)


4  MLR 310

5  Prest v. Pretrodel Resources (unreported) DeemsterCorlett's Judgment, Chancery Division,  August 13 2015

6  [2002] 1 WLR

7  (No.1) [2001] EWCA Civ 1318

8  On Civil Procedure  of the Supreme Court of England and Wales 2015, Paragraph 25.13.6 "No discrimination against claimants resident in other States"

9  Nasser v. United Bank of Kuwait [2002] 1 WLR

10  (No. 1) [2001] EWCA Civ 1318

11  Paragraph 13,Prest v. Pretrodel Resources (unreported) DeemsterCorlett's Judgment, Chancery Division, August 132015  

12  [2015] EWHC 996 (Comm)

13  Prest v Petrodel Resources Limited [2013] UKSC 34

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

David Wozniak
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.