Isle of Man: Piercing The Corporate Veil

Last Updated: 12 June 2013
Article by Claire Milne

The corporate veil principle

One of the fundamental principles of company law is that a lawfully incorporated company has a legal personality and identity that is separate from its directors or shareholders and is a separate legal entity, vested of separate legal rights and liabilities. Consequently, any liability incurred by the company does not extend to its shareholders (beyond any money paid for their shares) and directors (beyond any personal liability imposed upon them as a result of their directors' duties). The courts are reluctant to undermine legitimate corporate structures by "piercing the corporate veil" and holding shareholders personally liable for the debts and obligations of companies.

The above-mentioned principle applies equally within groups of companies and, as a general principle of company law, the relationship between parent and subsidiary companies is that they are separate legal entities, with the corporate veil only being pierced where there is a sham or façade or where statute requires.

A court may have reason to pierce the corporate veil where a contract justifies the treatment of the parent and the subsidiary as one company (at least for some purposes) or where special circumstances exist, indicating that the company is a mere façade concealing the true facts. In identifying what is a mere façade, the motive of those behind the company will be relevant.

The present position

Isle of Man case law on the topic of piercing the corporate veil has treated English case law as persuasive and so, for the purposes of this article, I have considered the position on piercing the corporate veil as established under English case law.

English case law demonstrates that, although such cases are exceptional, English courts will, in certain circumstances, exercise their jurisdiction to pierce the corporate veil. Where the veil is pierced, the courts may grant remedies against the controllers of a company which, in principle, would ordinarily only be available against the company.

A court may look at the relationship between a group of companies and might find that the necessary standard of reliance for piercing the corporate veil is established where the evidence shows that the parent has a practice of intervening in the trading operations of the subsidiaries. The result would be that the corporate veil would be pierced and the parent and subsidiary would be treated as one company.

English case law has established a number of relevant principles which must be applied when deciding whether the corporate veil may be pierced. Those principles can be summarised as follows:

  • Ownership and control of a company are not sufficient in themselves to justify the piercing of the corporate veil;
  • The corporate veil cannot be pierced (even where there is no unconnected third party) purely on the basis that it is perceived that piercing the veil would be in the interests of justice;
  • There must be evidence of impropriety;
  • Impropriety alone is insufficient cause to pierce the corporate veil. It must be further evidenced that the impropriety is linked to the avoidance or concealment of a liability through the use of a corporate structure; and
  • The court may consider the intentions of the wrongdoer when considering whether to pierce the corporate veil. In any event, it must be shown that the wrongdoer controlled the company and used the company as a device or façade to conceal their wrongdoing.

Irrespective of whether the relevant company was incorporated with deceptive intent, the court will want to see that is was being used as a façade at the time of the relevant transaction(s). A remedy will only be provided in respect of the particular wrong that has been committed.

In summary, arguments based on piercing the corporate veil have only succeeded in very limited circumstances, where the company in question is a sham or façade and has been used for improper purposes.

Recent decisions and potential future developments

The main issue concerning the courts in the English case of VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp and others [2011] EWHC 3107 (CH) was whether piercing the corporate veil could lead to a situation where non-contracting parties would be contractually bound under an agreement entered into by an associated company.

In the VTB case the claimant, VTB (an English bank), lent approximately $225 million to Russagroprom LLC (RAP) to fund the acquisition by RAP of a number of Russian dairy businesses from Nutritek. RAP subsequently defaulted on the loan and VTB, having recovered less than $40 million by enforcing the security provided, alleged that it was induced to enter into the facility agreement by fraudulent representations made by Nutritek and others. VTB alleged that the misrepresentations were part of a conspiracy between a number of legal and natural persons associated with RAP who were not parties to the facility agreement and argued that the court should pierce the corporate veil of RAP to find each of those persons liable under the agreement.

It was decided at first instance in the VTB case that the circumstances in which parties may pierce the corporate veil to bring contractual claims against individuals or companies that were not party to the original contract are limited to cases where there is some 'anterior or independent wrongdoing' by the controller of the company and that person attempts to use the company 'to immunise himself from liability for some wrongdoing' which existed outside the company. In reaching its decision, the court declined to follow the English cases of Antonio Gramsci Shipping Corporation v Stepanovs [2011] EWHC 333 (Comm), [2011] 1 Lloyd's Rep 647 (in which the court did extend the principle of piercing the corporate veil to find a third party liable as a co-contracting party) and Alliance Bank JSC v Aquanta Corporation [2011] EWHC 3281 (which followed the judgment in the Gramsci case).

Permission to appeal was granted in the VTB case and both the English Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court held that it would be contrary to both authority and principle (and therefore inappropriate) to allow the corporate veil to be pierced to treat an alleged controller of a company as a party to a contract entered into by that company.

The English Court of Appeal, in the VTB case, clarified the circumstances in which the English courts may pierce the corporate veil, rejecting the appeals from VTB and holding that the mechanism of piercing the corporate veil should not be used to allow contractual claims to proceed against non-contracting parties. In so holding, the Court of Appeal overruled the relevant parts of the decisions in the Gramsci case and the Alliance Bank case mentioned above as having been wrongly decided.

The Supreme Court, in the VTB case, found that it was unnecessary and inappropriate to decide whether the court has the power to pierce the corporate veil and acknowledged that the precise nature, basis and meaning of the principle of piercing the corporate veil, as well as the precise nature of the circumstances in which the principle can apply, are all 'somewhat obscure'. The Supreme Court expressly reserved for future decision the question of what is the true scope of the circumstances in which it is permissible to pierce the corporate veil, as well as the question of whether the Gramsci case was correctly decided.

The Supreme Court's judgment in the VTB case did little to clarify the law in connection with piercing the corporate veil and left open the question of whether there is scope for the principle to be extended in such a way in the future.

Most recently, the English Court of Appeal considered this issue in the case of Petrodel Resources Limited and others v Prest ([2012] EWCA Civ 1395), in which the Court of Appeal granted permission to appeal its decision in the case. The case raised the question of whether courts have the jurisdiction in financial remedy proceedings to order the transfer of properties or other assets belonging to companies owned by the parties. The appeal was heard, unusually, by a seven member panel of the Supreme Court on 5 and 6 March 2013 and it is expected that the Supreme Court's judgment will be handed down within 8 to 12 weeks of the hearing. That judgment should, hopefully, bring some welcome clarity to this area of the law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.