Last Updated: 29 November 2016
Article by Nigel Feetham

An interesting Judgment concerning PCC cells, which appears to be a first of its kind in Guernsey, has recently been handed down by the local courts. The case arose from orders made by the Guernsey Court putting certain entities into administration management and/or liquidation based on regulatory concerns.

The background was that an international accounting firm were appointed as administration managers, not under the companies legislation but under a special statutory regime which only the Guernsey FSC could apply for and the purpose of which was the protection of investors. What interests me for purposes of this article is the dispute as to the allocation of costs.

The Judge in previously granting the order for the appointment of administration managers had made the following order as to the allocation of fees and expenses:

"That the fees and expenses of the joint Administration Managers be payable from the assets of the Funds and the underlying cells in such proportions as there are assets available to meet such fees and expenses and as the joint Administration Managers deem appropriate."

The Judge pointed out that the administration managers needed to be confident that their expenses would be paid and that at the time he took the view that he had the power to make an order in those terms and that nobody had subsequently challenged his power to do so. He also considered that in the exercise of his discretion it was an appropriate order to make as there was no better practical or pragmatic order that he could have made in those circumstances. Here lies the conundrum.

In the present application, the administration managers were applying for directions from the Court as to how to give effect to the cost allocation order above.


The approach proposed by the administration managers was first of all to allocate specific costs to the specific cells in respect of which those costs had been incurred where fund-specific costs could be identified. The administration managers had incurred further substantial costs that were general or common in nature and could not be allocated to a specific fund or cell. In relation to those expenses, the proposal was to allocate the further costs equally to all the funds concerned.

The administration managers had also looked at future costs, much of which had been paid. These represented their estimate of the costs required to liquidate or exit each fund, some central core costs, future legal fees and some specific service provider fees. The proposal was to allocate them on a similar basis: fund specific costs to the relevant fund; costs of a central nature across all funds; and a provision for recovery from the funds that could afford to pay a share of costs which the funds with a shortfall could not afford to pay.

Several objections were raised to the method of allocation of costs, all of which were considered but dismissed by the Court.

One objection was made on behalf of investors generally and related to the segregation of assets and liabilities within a protected cell structure, namely, to the proposed allocation to the funds with sufficient assets of a share of the shortfall of costs relating to funds that did not have sufficient assets.

The argument was put by counsel that the proposed allocation would defeat the object of PCC legislation. His submission was that the purpose of the PCC legislation was to protect the integrity of individual cells and their assets so that any one cell does not have to pay liabilities incurred by any other cell. Counsel referred to the potential reputational damage to Guernsey and its funds industry; he submitted that the proposal put forward could undermine confidence in its PCC legislation.

In its Judgment the Court noted that these concerns were not shared by the GFSC, with the counter-submission made that the purpose of the statute appointing the administrator was to give the Court the power to override legislation in exceptional circumstances such as the circumstances that had been identified in this case. This being such an exceptional case, the Judge stated that the costs order he made was the only practical pragmatic order that could have been made at the time and the only basis upon which the administrative managers or indeed any other person would have accepted the role that they were being asked to undertake.

Per the Judge: "There are well recognised instances of pooling of costs in the liquidation of group companies or related companies and although those instances are not directly relevant because we are not dealing with a liquidation or administration under the Companies Law, nevertheless they can be considered analogous. As I previously said I had the power to make the order that I made on 24th April 2015; that order has not been challenged; nobody has sought to set it aside; the order stands; and in my view what is being proposed by [the administration managers] is a practical way of giving effect to my order. I note in passing that as a matter of fact, the amount of fund specific costs having to be re-allocated to other funds is negligible in relation to the total costs incurred."

The Judge further noted that if the order were not made as proposed one suggestion was that the administration managers could bear the costs themselves "but in my opinion that would be unreasonable when they have taken on the responsibilities on the understanding that their costs would be paid. I see no reason why [they] should have to bear the costs". The alternative suggestion was that the GFSC should pay but as the Judged stated "this case is not an occasion for me to review the GFSC's policies or the policies laid down by the States of Guernsey under which they operate as laid down both in legislation and in the State."

This was undoubtedly a complex issue for the Court and it is not difficult to have sympathy for the situation the administration managers found themselves in. Admittedly, PCC regimes tend not to specifically address the issue of IP costs but in this case the Court applied non-PCC legislation to effectively override the PCC regime.

The Judge, however, was at pains to explain in his Judgment that his original order had not been previously challenged and that the proposed allocation was the only practical way of dealing with the matter.


Perhaps had the Court, at the earlier application stage, had the benefit of the argument raising the objection as to any allocation shortfall, as it had at the directions hearing, it may have reached a different decision, allowing the Guernsey legislature an opportunity to make such amendment to the PCC Act as was necessary before it considered the application again.

In my book "Protected Cell Companies: A Guide to Their Implementation and Use" (2010, 2nd edition, Spiramus Press), co-authored with Grant Jones, on the issue of IP costs we pointed out "A PCC's raison d'être is cellular integrity and cellular integrity should even extend to IPs." (p. 284).

Indeed, promoters, investors and contractual parties alike transact with a PCC on the basis that a cell is only liable to pay for liabilities incurred on its behalf. To do otherwise is to undermine the statutory ring-fencing which lies at the heart of the PCC regime. Worse still, this could send a contradictory message to foreign Courts who in any potential foreign proceedings would be asked to respect the ring-fence by applying PCC legislation, especially on insolvency, whilst ignoring their own domestic laws. If PCC legislation is to be treated as substantive law (as opposed to rules of procedure), the Courts in the PCC jurisdiction of incorporation have to apply the cellular firewall in accordance with the terms of the PCC legislation. If they do not (as appears to have been the case here), there is a danger that a foreign Court will also do the same and not abide by the cellular priority rules. In my view, it could therefore have a negative consequence if a foreign Court when reviewing the Guernsey PCC regime came to the conclusion that Guernsey judicial authorities introduce uncertainty as regards the statutory segregation of assets and liabilities between cells and/or blurred the distinction between substance and procedure. There is no reason, however, why the matter cannot be clarified by the introduction of an express provision in the Guernsey PCC Act itself in respect of the allocation of IP/administration managers costs.

Clearly, in a PCC to the extent that any costs are incurred for the benefit of all cells they should be allocated across the cells on a pro-rated basis. On the other hand, absent express provision in the PCC Act itself to the contrary, in my view any shortfall of assets in a cell to pay for costs attributable to that cell should not be met with the assets of other cells (including in respect of IP costs). The PCC regime, of course, may also expressly provide that where liabilities cannot be attributed to cellular assets or where cellular assets are insufficient, they shall be satisfied from the hub/core (non-cellular assets). But this assumes that the PCC has non-cellular assets to pay for such claims (at least in part). Therefore if there is no public funding available within the jurisdiction for cases of public interest, it must be incumbent upon regulators that authorise the establishment of a PCC with different economic interests/shareholders to ensure that the company's hub/core is properly capitalised to meet not just the operational costs, but more importantly, the expense of unforeseen legal proceedings by or against the PCC (and not just a cell). This should be part of the capital commitment by the promoter when the PCC is set up.

Nigel Feetham is a senior partner at Gibraltar law firm Hassans and the co-author of "Protected Cell Companies: a Guide to their Implementation and Use" which was cited by the judge in PAC RE 5-AT v. AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC., No. CV-14-131-BLG-CSO (D. Mont. May 13, 2015). He is also a Visiting Professor of law at Nottingham Trent University.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Nigel Feetham
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions