Austria: Cartel Law Amendment 2005

Last Updated: 5 December 2006
Article by Andreas Foglar-Deinhardstein

It has only been three years since the Austrian cartel law was last amended. Whereas at that time the focus was on the creation of new authorities (Federal Competition Authority and Federal Cartel Prosecutor) and procedural changes, the new amendment primarily concerns substantive issues. The present amendment is, for the time being, the last brick of alignment with EC cartel law. As regards the latter regime, EC Regulation 1/2003 had brought a complete paradigm shift in enforcement. Instead of constitutive exemption decisions by the European Commission for notified cartels, there is now a decentralized system of exemption by law on a Community level, where the undertakings themselves have to assess at their own risk, whether their practice infringes cartel law or not. The present alterations to Austrian cartel law, which have entered into force at the beginning of 2006, primarily reflect this change in the European law framework and are justified alone due to the fact that the existence of deviating substantive provisions for merely domestic cases will be by and large avoided in future. In more detail, the changes look as follows:


As is already the case on a Community level, from now on also cartels limited to Austria in their effects do no longer require an explicit approval decision (by the Cartel Court); in fact, there is no such decision anymore at all. More precisely, those cartels are automatically exempted which contribute to improving the production or distribution of goods or to promoting technical or economic progress, while allowing consumers a fair share of the resulting benefit, and which do not impose on the entrepreneurs concerned restrictions which are not indispensable to the attainment of these objectives, or afford such entrepreneurs the possibility of eliminating competition in respect of a substantial part of the products in question. The relevant provision reproduces Art 81 EC Treaty almost literally.

The new legal situation, however, also entails a reduction of legal certainty for the undertakings concerned, since they and their attorneys respectively henceforth have to assess for themselves in case of cartel agreements and concerted practices with merely local or regional effect, whether the prerequisites for justification are fulfilled. It is exactly in a field like cartel law, for the interpretation of which economic deliberations play an outstanding role, that this may – even for the specialist – be extremely difficult. In any case, due to the far-reaching alignment of Austrian with EC cartel law in this field the often hard to decide question, whether an agreement is capable of affecting interstate-trade (in which case EC cartel law is applicable) loses an essential part of its importance.

Also, the former peculiar distinction between horizontal and vertical competitive restraints is not of significance anymore. Thus, there are no special provisions for vertical distribution restraints in future. Till now, such vertical distribution restraints only had to be notified to the Cartel Court while submitting a sample agreement, but could be legally agreed upon and implemented before a possible prohibition decision. As opposed to this, horizontal cartels, i.e. agreements between undertakings operating at the same market level, were void prior to the approval by the Cartel Court and could not be implemented till then without triggering a fine. For both kinds of competitive restraints, the system of exemption by law applies henceforth. This also means, however, that vertical restraints not fulfilling the exemption requirements are prohibited, for which reason they are void and must not be implemented.

Furthermore, the differentiation between cartels by intention and cartels by effect – in the latter case a competitive restraint is not intended – has been dropped; the privileged treatment of cartels by effect – they were implementable prior to a prohibition decision – is cancelled. The special provisions regarding non-binding association recommendations have also been cancelled. A tightening compared to Community law is constituted by the fact that recommendations to observe certain prices, price limits etc. shall be forbidden even if they cannot be considered a cartel, unless these recommendations do explicitly refer to their non-binding character and no economic or social pressure is and shall be exerted for the purpose of their enforcement.

It is also under the new legal regime that the Federal Minister of Justice can determine by means of a regulation that certain groups of cartels (hitherto e.g. joint purchasing agreements, joint bidding agreements in public procurement) fulfil the exemption criteria. However, this can only be done in a declaratory manner, therefore not – as was the case so far – in a constitutive way. It remains to be seen, though, to which extent this authority will be made use of.

Apart from the exceptions already known for de minimis cartels, resale price maintenances for books, cooperatives and credit institutions, a new exception to the cartel prohibition is introduced for agricultural production businesses.

Cartels admitted under the old but forbidden under the new legal regime may be implemented until December 31, 2006 latest.

Merger Control

In this regard, there is especially a raising of the annual turnover thresholds for the obligation to notify. Henceforth, the threshold for the domestic annual turnover of all undertakings concerned in total is EUR 30 million (instead of EUR 15 million as hitherto). The de minimis threshold for the worldwide annual turnover of at least two undertakings concerned is raised from EUR 2 million to EUR 5 million each (the threshold for the worldwide annual turnover of the undertakings concerned in total – EUR 300 million – remains unchanged). Furthermore, certain concentrations with a negligible domestic effect are as such exempted from the obligation to notify: Only one undertaking has more than EUR 5 million annual turnover in Austria and the other undertakings concerned together do not have more than EUR 30 million annual worldwide turnover in total.

As regards joint ventures, there is an alignment with EC merger control: Henceforth, the only thing crucial for the existence of a concentration is, whether the joint venture fulfils on a lasting basis all the functions of an independent economic entity (full-functional joint venture). Therefore, it is not decisive any longer, whether this leads to a co-ordination in the competitive conduct of the founding undertakings with respect to one another or to the joint venture (co-operative joint venture). Nevertheless, effects of the joint venture fulfilling the criteria of a cartel do fall under the cartel prohibition, a non-prohibition under the merger control regime being irrelevant in this respect.

From now on, mergers shall no longer be notified to the Cartel Court, but to the Federal Competition Authority instead. The flat-rate fee for this is EUR 1.500,-. Due to the fact that – according to the new regime – the five months time period for a decision by the Cartel Court is only triggered by the motion for a closer examination through one of the Public Parties (instead of the arrival of the notification, as hitherto), the proceedings in such a case take about a month longer in practice. The right of other undertakings to issue a statement with respect to the merger within 14 days from the merger notification is maintained. If one of the Public Parties files a motion for closer examination with the Cartel Court, undertakings affected may issue statements to the Court without any deadline. The new regime, however, still does not grant third undertakings the status of a party, so that they are still not entitled to a certain treatment of their statement. Besides, the publication of the notification does not take place in the Wiener Zeitung any longer, but on the website of the Federal Competition Authority (


Instead of a number of different enforcement powers of the Cartel Court, the Court now has to put an end to infringements of cartel law prohibitions and give the respective orders required in a uniform manner. Such orders may also concern changes of the structure of the undertaking, i.e. divestitures, although they must not be disproportional. As a further innovation, the Cartel Court may – instead of an order for putting to an end – declare commitments of the undertakings concerned binding, if it is to be expected that, as a consequence, there will be no further infringements.

As opposed to the existing judicial practice, the Cartel Court is now explicitly granted the authority to establish also for the past, in what way certain facts are subject to the Cartel Act, provided that there is a legitimate interest to do so. This is of importance, since – according to the old legal regime – the sued entrepreneur was able to avoid an order by the Cartel Court by simply ceasing the incriminated conduct prior to (possibly shortly before) the delivery of the judgement. Generally, the Cartel Court´s authority of establishment provides the undertakings concerned at least with some legal certainty in a system of exemption by law. However, the Cartel Court is still not granted the authority to establish the applicability of EC cartel law; the relevant monopoly, therefore, still lies with the European Commission. Yet the authority of the latter only refers to cases touching upon public interest without the undertakings concerned having legal title thereto.

In the field of sanctions, the principle of fault is now explicitly contained in the law: Only intentional or careless infringements of cartel law can trigger fines. The hitherto existing minimum amount of fines is abolished. The prescription period for the motion to impose a fine is now five instead of three years. Another novelty is the coercive penalty for enforcing decisions of the Cartel Court. The coercive penalty per diem amounts to up to 5% of the last year´s average daily turnover. The initial plan to grant the Federal Competition Authority the power to order the giving of information and the submission of documents by means of a principally unappealable decision was eventually not realized.

Leniency Program

This new provision serves the purpose of facilitating the detection of cartel infringements. Accordingly, the Federal Competition Authority can refrain from filing a motion for the imposition of a fine, if the undertaking in question has (a) ceased its activity in the cartel, (b) informed the Federal Competition Authority of the cartel, before it has come to know about it itself, (c) co-operated with the Federal Competition Authority hereinafter in an unrestricted and speedy manner in order to completely clarify the case and (d) not forced other participants to participate in the cartel. If the Federal Competition Authority has already come to know about the cartel in question, it can file a motion for a reduced fine. Up to date, in case of forbidden implementation of a cartel, one only had to take into consideration the contribution in the detection of the infringement when assessing the fine.

Contrary to the legal situation on an EC level, the said provision does not confer a right to being treated in the above way; rather, it is within the discretion of the Federal Competition Authority, whether or not to file a motion for imposition of a fine and reduced fine respectively. Furthermore, the requesting undertaking shall only be given a non-binding notice on the granting of the leniency-status. At least it is forbidden to use information derived from the network of the Member States´ authorities originating from a request for leniency treatment as a basis for a motion to impose a fine. Beyond this, the Federal Competition Authority has meanwhile – in accordance with the statutory provisions – drawn up and published on its website a guide on its practice in terms of leniency.

As usual, the above information only gives an outline of the regime change. For detailed questions in this context, you are kindly requested to contact our law firm.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions