ARTICLE
17 October 2022

Ohio Appeals Judge's Renewed Order Blocking Abortion Ban

SG
Shipman & Goodwin LLP

Contributor

Shipman & Goodwin LLP  logo
Shipman & Goodwin’s value lies in our commitment -- to our clients, to the profession and to the community. We have one goal: to help our clients achieve their goals. How we accomplish it is simple: we devote our considerable experience and depth of knowledge to understand each client’s unique needs, business and industry, and then we develop solutions to meet those needs. Clients turn to us when they need a trusted advisor. With our invaluable awareness of each client’s challenges, we can counsel them at every step -- to keep their operations running smoothly, help them navigate complex business transactions, position them for future growth, or resolve business disputes. The success of our clients is of primary importance to us and our attorneys invest meaningful time getting to know the client's business and are skilled in the practice areas and industry sectors critical to that success. With more than 175 attorneys in offices throughout Connecticut, New York and in Washington, DC, we serve the needs of
In continued litigation of Ohio's abortion ban, which criminalizes doctors performing abortions after fetal cardiac activity is detected, Ohio state judge Christian Jenkins followed up his September 14, 2022...
United States Ohio Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In continued litigation of Ohio's abortion ban, which criminalizes doctors performing abortions after fetal cardiac activity is detected, Ohio state judge Christian Jenkins followed up his September 14, 2022 temporary restraining order (TRO) with a 42-page order on October 12, 2022 that continues to enjoin enforcement of Ohio's abortion ban. This preliminary injunction, like the TRO before it which expired on the same day, will bar enforcement of the ban during the ensuring underlying litigation over constitutionality of the law. Judge Jenkins' October 12 order reinforced the position he had taken in his TRO, that abortion rights are protected in Ohio per the equal protection and due process clauses of Ohio's Bill of Rights, along with a 2011 constitutional amendment permitting Ohioans to choose their own health care. In remarks from the bench, Judge Jenkins said further that the state failed to prove that the ban is narrowly tailored enough not to infringe on those rights, saying instead that the law is written "to almost completely eliminate the rights of Ohio women. It is not narrowly tailored, not even close."

The State of Ohio, through its Attorney General Dave Yost, filed a notice of appeal to Judge Jenkins' order, up to Ohio's First District Court of Appeals, also on October 12, likely prepared to do so after Judge Jenkins had announced from the bench five days earlier what his decision would be, after an evidentiary hearing in his court on October 7. Although Ohio's brief is not yet available, the state has said previously that certain exceptions in the law allow providers to rely on their own sound medical judgment, and it has argued there was nothing in Ohio's legislative history, before or after Roe was decided in 1973, that shows an inclination toward legalizing abortion by Ohio state lawmakers.

As of now, however, with Judge Jenkins' preliminary injunction in place barring enforcement of Ohio's ban, it is legal in Ohio for doctors to perform abortions until 22 weeks of pregnancy. Shipman & Goodwin previously covered Judge Jenkins' TROs here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More