ARTICLE
27 July 2021

AIG Must Defend Landry's In A Data Breach From 2014-15!

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
My good friend Judy Greenwald reported at BusinessInsurance.com that "After AIG refused the claim, Landry's filed suit, and the U.S. District Court in Houston ruled in the insurer's favor and dismissed the case.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

My good friend Judy Greenwald reported at BusinessInsurance.com that “After AIG refused the claim, Landry's filed suit, and the U.S. District Court in Houston ruled in the insurer's favor and dismissed the case.  A unanimous three-judge appeals court panel overturned that decision.”  The July 22, 2021 article entitled “AIG unit must defend Texas retailer in data breach case” included these comments:

Houston-based Landry's Inc., which operates retail properties including restaurants, hotels and casinos, discovered a data breach that occurred between May 2014 and December 2015 that involved the unauthorized installation of a program on its payment processing devices, according to Wednesday's ruling by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans in Landry's Inc. v. The Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania.

Over about a year-and-a-half, the program retrieved personal information from millions of credit cards and at least some of that information was used to make unauthorized charges, the ruling said.

“It's also undisputed that hackers' theft of credit-card data and use of that data to make fraudulent purchases constitute ‘violations' of consumers' privacy rights,” the panel said in reversing the lower court decision and remanding the case for further proceedings.

This will be an important case to follow!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More