ARTICLE
15 February 2022

The Top 10 Trademark Trial And Appeal Board Decisions Of 2021

WG
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.

Contributor

For nearly a century, Wolf Greenfield has helped clients protect their most valuable intellectual property. The firm offers a full range of IP services, including patent prosecution and litigation; post-grant proceedings, including IPRs; opinions and strategic counseling; licensing; intellectual property audits and due diligence; trademark and copyright prosecution and litigation; and other issues related to the commercialization of intellectual property.
In a two-part series on his blog, "The TTABlog®," John Welch discusses the 10 Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) decisions that he considers to be the most important and/or interesting from 2021.
United States Intellectual Property

In a two-part series on his blog, "The TTABlog®," John Welch discusses the 10 Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) decisions that he considers to be the most important and/or interesting from 2021.

Click here to read Part 1, which covers:

  • Chutter, Inc. v. Great Management Group, LLC and Chutter, Inc. v. Great Concepts, LLC
  • Fuji Medical Instruments Mfg. Co., Ltd. v. American Crocodile International Group, Inc.
  • Philanthropist.com, Inc. v. The General Conference Corporation of Seventh-day Adventists
  • The Coca-Cola Company v. Meenaxi Enterprise, Inc.
  • In re Dolce Vita Footwear, Inc.

Click here to read Part 2, which covers:

  • The United States Olympic Committee v. Tempting Brands Netherlands B.V.
  • In re Dimarzio, Inc.
  • In re Taverna Izakaya LLC
  • McGowen Precision Barrels, LLC v. Proof Research, Inc.
  • In re Maugus Manufacturing, Inc.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More