ARTICLE
11 June 2024

Telephone And Texting Compliance News — May 2024

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private equity, sustainable energy, and technology. The world’s most innovative companies trust Mintz to provide expert advice, protect and monetize their IP, negotiate deals, source financing, and solve complex legal challenges. The firm has over 600 attorneys across offices in Boston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco, San Diego, and Toronto.
We are pleased to present our latest edition of Telephone and Texting Compliance News, providing insights and news related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).
United States Washington Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

We are pleased to present our latest edition of Telephone and Texting Compliance News, providing insights and news related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). In this month's newsletter, we continue our coverage of the FCC Enforcement Bureau's “Spring Cleaning” initiative to combat robocalling, including its cease-and-desist letter ordering Alliant Financial to mitigate unlawful traffic on its networks and a related Public Notice. We also discuss the bureau's first-of-its-kind Enforcement Advisory classifying a group of repeat robocallers and their personnel, known collectively as Royal Tiger, as a Consumer Communications Information Services Threat. Finally, we cover the FCC's adoption of two Notices of Apparent Liability focusing on an illegal robocalling scheme during the New Hampshire presidential primary.

This month's Litigation Update explores recent court decisions that provide defendant-friendly clarity on technology and platforms that meet the definition of an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS). These include the Third Circuit's confirmation in Perrong v. Montgomery County Democratic Committee that list-mode calls, which involve a device dialing telephone numbers from a customer list, do not trigger ATDS provisions. In Soliman v. Subway Franchisee Advertising Fund Trust, Ltd., the Second Circuit held that the TCPA's ban on the use of an artificial or prerecorded voice does not apply to text messages. Litigants also received critical appellate guidance on structuring class settlements and related fee requests from the Eleventh Circuit in Drazen v. Pinto, which involved a settlement of claims premised on the use of an ATDS.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More