Litigation Finance Update: US Tax Court Refutes Loan Treatment For Upfront Litigation Support Payments In Novoselsky V. Commissioner

MB
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
The taxation of litigation finance transactions has been subject to a great deal of uncertainty and has the potential to be extremely adverse to both the funding party and the party receiving the funding.
United States Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The taxation of litigation finance transactions has been subject to a great deal of uncertainty and has the potential to be extremely adverse to both the funding party and the party receiving the funding. Parties to these arrangements have cast the transactions as non-taxable loans, notional principal contracts and forward contracts. In Novoselsky v. Commissioner, decided on May 28, 2020, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) successfully challenged a transaction structured as a loan. As a result, the lawyer receiving the funding was subject to full federal income on tax on the receipt of payments designated as loan proceeds. The Tax Court also upheld an assessment of significant penalties against the lawyer for following the form of the transaction. Mark Leeds and Stephanie Wood, of the New York office of Mayer Brown, with input from Philip Braverman of Burford Capital plc, analyze this new decision and its impact on the litigation funding market.

Downloads - Download Document

Originally published June 02 2020

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe - Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2020. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Litigation Finance Update: US Tax Court Refutes Loan Treatment For Upfront Litigation Support Payments In Novoselsky V. Commissioner

United States Tax
Contributor
Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More