ARTICLE
17 June 2021

Ten Years Go By Without The DOJ Receiving Even One Of These Notices

AM
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

Contributor

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP logo
Allen Matkins, founded in 1977, is a California-based law firm with more than 200 attorneys in four major metropolitan areas of California: Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, and San Francisco. The firm's areas of focus include real estate, construction, land use, environmental and natural resources, corporate and securities, real estate and commercial finance, bankruptcy, restructurings and creditors' rights, joint ventures, and tax; labor and employment, and trials, litigation, risk management, and alternative dispute resolution in all of these areas. For more information about Allen Matkins please visit www.allenmatkins.com.
In wake of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the California legislature saw fit to add Section 2207 to the California Corporations Code.
United States California Corporate/Commercial Law

In wake of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the California legislature saw fit to add Section 2207 to the California Corporations Code.  The statute threatens corporations with a $1 million civil penalty if they have actual knowledge that an officer, director, manager, or agent has done one of several specified acts and fails to notify the California Attorney General or "appropriate government agency" and its shareholders in writing.   The statute applies only to corporations that are issuers, as defined by Section 2 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  Cal. Corp. Code § 2207(f).  

I recently contacted the California Department of Justice to inquire about the number of notifications that it has received pursuant to Section 2207 in the last ten years.   The Department reported that it had conducted a search of its  "legal indexes, knowledgeable persons, and logical places" but was "unable to locate any responsive records".   One might argue that the legislature should repeal Section 2207 by reason of desuetude, but that assumes that the statute was once used.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More