ARTICLE
8 June 2021

Court Finds No Cause Of Action Against Officer For Interfering With Shareholder Inspection

AM
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

Contributor

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP logo
Allen Matkins, founded in 1977, is a California-based law firm with more than 200 attorneys in four major metropolitan areas of California: Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, and San Francisco. The firm's areas of focus include real estate, construction, land use, environmental and natural resources, corporate and securities, real estate and commercial finance, bankruptcy, restructurings and creditors' rights, joint ventures, and tax; labor and employment, and trials, litigation, risk management, and alternative dispute resolution in all of these areas. For more information about Allen Matkins please visit www.allenmatkins.com.
William Romanowski is a former NFL linebacker who later became the majority shareholder, director, and "public face" of Nutrition 53, Inc.
United States California Corporate/Commercial Law

William Romanowski is a former NFL linebacker who later became the majority shareholder, director, and "public face" of Nutrition 53, Inc.  When the company's second largest shareholder was allegedly denied inspection of the corporate records, it sued the company and Mr. Romanowski for breach of fiduciary duty and violation of California's shareholder inspection statute - Corporations Code Section 1601.  

Earlier this month, U.S. District Court Judge John A. Mendez dismissed both causes against Mr. Romanowski.  JAH Interests V, LLC v. Nutrition 53, Inc.,  2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87224.  With respect to Section 1601, Judge Mendez found that "the plain language of these provisions supports Romanowski's position because only the duties and obligations of corporate entities are expressly addressed in [Corporations Code] §§ 1601, 1602, 1604, 1605".   Section 1603(b) does require officers and agents of the corporation to produce documents "under penalty of punishment for contempt of court".   However, Judge Mendez found that that scenario arises when "there has been no superior court order to enforce Plaintiffs' inspection rights and thus those duties have not been triggered".   He further found that the plaintiffs had cited no authority for the court to find a cause of action against an individual officer or director.  Because Judge Mendez found any amendment would be futile, he dismissed this cause without leave to amend.

Syttende Mai

Today is Norway's Constitution Day, celebrating the signing of its constitution in 1814.  Gratulerer med dagen!

1077986a.jpg

The above "We Will Win" photograph was taken in 1941 by Carl Dihle near Sundvollen, Norway.  The photograph became a famous resistance slogan and the Norwegian government in exile reproduced it on a postage stamp.  

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More