ARTICLE
16 September 2021

Firm Settles Charges For Supervisory Failures Over Partial Tender Offers

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

The SROs determined that the firm violated supervisory, fair dealing and registration provisions and SEA Rule 14e-4.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

A firm settled FINRA, NYSE American, Nasdaq ISE, Nasdaq Phlx and Cboe Exchange (collectively, the self-regulatory agencies or "SROs") charges for supervisory failures in connection with the Exchange Act's ban on tendering more shares in a partial tender offer than are owned by an individual.

In separate Letters of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, the SROs stated that the firm did not have procedures for compliance with SEA Rule 14e-4 ("Prohibited Transactions in Connection with Partial Tender Offers") from June 2013 through February 2016. The SROs found that the firm's adopted procedures for tender offer-related customer instructions and proprietary accounts did not include an assessment of the net position of the firm or its customers with respect to the shares being tendered.

As a result, the SROs determined that the firm over-tendered shares in at least one partial tender offer because its operational procedures did not take into account a number of mandatory factors, including options positions or securities held in multiple accounts by the same individual. The SROs also found that the firm did not register one of its employees who executed, as a securities trader, a number of securities transactions related to the partial tender offer.

The SROs determined that the firm violated supervisory, fair dealing and registration provisions and SEA Rule 14e-4.

To settle the charges, the firm agreed to a censure and an $800,000 total fine, composed of (i) a $156,250 fine for each of FINRA, NYSE American, Nasdaq ISE and Nasdaq Phlx and (ii) a $175,000 fine for Cboe Exchange. In addition, the firm agreed to pay $6,581 in disgorgement to Cboe Exchange.

Primary Sources

  1. FINRA AWC: Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
  2. NYSE American AWC: Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
  3. Nasdaq ISE AWC: Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
  4. Nasdaq Phlx AWC: Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
  5. Cboe Letter of Consent: Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More