ARTICLE
16 July 2021

Firm Settles SEC And NYAG Charges For Undisclosed Conflicts Of Interest When Recommending Retirement Program

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

A dual-registered broker-dealer and investment adviser reached parallel settlements with the SEC and New York Attorney General.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property, Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences, Government and Public Sector topic(s)

A dual-registered broker-dealer and investment adviser reached parallel settlements with the SEC and New York Attorney General ("NYAG") (collectively, the "Agencies") to resolve charges for inaccurate and misleading statements and failing to sufficiently disclose conflicts of interest to participants in employer-sponsored retirement plans.

In their Orders (here and here), the Agencies alleged that the firm and its Wealth Management Advisers ("WMAs") did not adequately disclose the full nature and extent of conflicts of interest in recommending to clients that they roll over retirement assets into a specific managed account program. The Agencies alleged, among other things, that the company incentivized and pressured its WMAs to prioritize the managed account program over lower-cost alternatives while holding themselves out as fiduciaries. The Agencies alleged that the company (i) paid WMAs more in variable compensation for signing clients up for the managed account program than for other alternatives and (ii) reprimanded WMAs for failing to meet enrollment targets, including placing WMAs on performance improvement plans and threatening to terminate their employment.

Additionally, the Agencies alleged that the company did not take adequate steps to ensure that its WMAs discussed with clients the fees arising from the rollover recommendations. Rather, the SEC found that training materials directed WMAs not to discuss such fees with clients.

As a result of its findings, the SEC determined that the company violated Sections 206(2) and 206(4) of the Advisers Act and IAA Rule 206(4)-7 ("Compliance Procedures and Practices"). The NYAG determined that the company violated Section 63(12) of the Martin Act.

To settle the charges, the company agreed to (i) cease and desist from any future violations, (ii) be censured, and (iii) pay disgorgement, prejudgment interest and a civil penalty totaling $97 million that will be distributed to investors through a "Fair Fund."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More