ARTICLE
14 July 2021

Didi's Split Priorities Spelled IPO Trouble

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private equity, sustainable energy, and technology. The world’s most innovative companies trust Mintz to provide expert advice, protect and monetize their IP, negotiate deals, source financing, and solve complex legal challenges. The firm has over 600 attorneys across offices in Boston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco, San Diego, and Toronto.
The Didi Global IPO situation will serve as a reminder of the ever present need for continuing "due diligence" through the public offering process.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

The Didi Global IPO situation will serve as a reminder of the ever present need for continuing "due diligence" through the public offering process. More than fifty years ago, securities lawyers were reminded of the importance of the diligence process in connection with public offerings by the criticism of them in the Bar-Chris case.

Even after the formal due diligence is concluded, every reasonable effort must be made in connection with bring downs. Third party verification, to the extent possible, is always worthwhile. 

The regulators in Beijing were under the impression Didi would pause its initial public offering while it addressed data-security concerns, according to people familiar with the company's conversations with regulators. In New York, Didi offered assurances that Beijing had given it the green light, said people close to the listing process.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/didi-ipo-china-regulators-investors-trouble-1

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More