ARTICLE
1 July 2021

Global Engineering Company Settles DOJ And SEC Charges For FCPA Violations In Brazilian Government Bribery Scheme

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A global engineering company settled DOJ and SEC charges for involvement in a bribery scheme to secure a contract with a Brazilian state-owned oil company.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

A global engineering company settled DOJ and SEC charges for involvement in a bribery scheme to secure a contract with a Brazilian state-owned oil company.

In an information filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, the DOJ charged the company with one count of conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") by improperly paying foreign officials to win an approximately $190 million contract to design a gas-to-chemical complex in Brazil. The company entered into a three-year deferred-prosecution agreement with the DOJ and agreed to pay a monetary penalty of $18.375 million. According to the DOJ, and in accordance with the Department's FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy, the penalty was reduced by 25% compared to the applicable U.S. Sentencing Guidelines fine due to the company's full cooperation and remediation. Approximately $10.7 million of the penalty may be offset against payments to the UK's Serious Fraud Office ("SFO") and Brazilian authorities in related resolutions.

In a related civil matter, the SEC charged the company with improper payments in the amount of approximately $1.1 million, including the use of a Monaco-based intermediary that had previously failed the company's due diligence process. The SEC alleged that the payments were not accurately reflected in the company's books and records, and that the company failed to have in place sufficient internal accounting controls to detect or prevent the misconduct. As a result, the SEC claimed that the company violated Sections 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B) and 30A ("Prohibited foreign trade practices by issuers") of the Exchange Act. To settle the charges, the company agreed to pay $22.7 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, $12.6 million of which may be offset against disgorgement paid by the company to the SFO and Brazilian authorities.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More