ARTICLE
6 May 2022

NAIC Discusses Best Practices For Restructuring Mechanisms

KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Contributor

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer is a world-leading global law firm, where our ambition is to help you achieve your goals. Exceptional client service and the pursuit of excellence are at our core. We invest in and care about our client relationships, which is why so many are longstanding. We enjoy breaking new ground, as we have for over 170 years. As a fully integrated transatlantic and transpacific firm, we are where you need us to be. Our footprint is extensive and committed across the world’s largest markets, key financial centres and major growth hubs. At our best tackling complexity and navigating change, we work alongside you on demanding litigation, exacting regulatory work and complex public and private market transactions. We are recognised as leading in these areas. We are immersed in the sectors and challenges that impact you. We are recognised as standing apart in energy, infrastructure and resources. And we’re focused on areas of growth that affect every business across the world.
Insurers with legacy blocks of business, or with other motivations to enter into block transfers of business or corporate split-offs, should consider a recent regulator call on so-called Insurance
United States Insurance

Insurers with legacy blocks of business, or with other motivations to enter into block transfers of business or corporate split-offs, should consider a recent regulator call on so-called Insurance Business Transfers (IBTs) and corporate divisions. These are techniques that would allow an insurer to (i) assign a book of insurance policies to another carrier without unanimous affirmative policyholder consent (a so-called IBT) or (ii) to split into multiple distinct entities (a division). Some states have already adopted statutes allowing these types of transactions, which have invited comparison to the United Kingdom's Part VII. IBTs and corporate divisions are subject to state regulatory approval, and in some cases judicial review, following a prescribed process under the respective state statutes.

The Restructuring Mechanisms Subgroup of the Restructuring Mechanisms Working Group within the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' (NAIC) Financial (E) Committee is tasked with developing best practices with respect to these kinds of transactions and also considering any needed changes to risk-based capital rules arising out of these matters. On a May 4, 2022, video call with interested parties, the Subgroup discussed "foundational principles" and proposed best practices associated with IBTs and divisions. The Subgroup addressed materials, issued in late April and available here, that set out the NAIC's priorities governing these transactions.

The foundational principles are summarized below, along with some highlights of the call. As a general comment, it was noted on the call that some states already have assumption and novation statutes expressly requiring unanimous policyholder consent, and therefore it might be unrealistic for such a state to relax these requirements in an IBT or division context. At the same time, the need for uniformity among state procedures governing IBTs and divisions was also emphasized by some.

  1. Policyholders and Other Key Stakeholders Should Never Be Left Worse Off. A brief discussion was held on whether the threshold should be "no worse off" or "not materially adversely affected."
  2. Robust Regulatory Review Process. The domiciliary state regulator should perform a review akin to that conducted in a Form A application (for a corporate acquisition).
  3. Guaranty Fund Coverage. No impacted policyholder should lose guaranty fund protection as a result of a transaction. During the call, it was noted that the nationwide associations of guaranty funds - NOLHGA for life and health and NCIGF for property and casualty - have been involved in this process and can be valuable resources for regulators and policyholders.
  4. Secondary Market Mechanisms. A division or IBT should not reduce coverage benefits. Specifically, if there were any "secondary market or similar mechanisms" that benefited policyholders, state regulators should ensure that the benefits remain after the division or IBT.
  5. Use Uniform NAIC Valuation and Accounting Standards. In their review, regulators are "discouraged" from allowing permitted practices and should require applicants for an IBT or division to adhere closely to the NAIC's statutory accounting principles.
  6. Independent Expert. The regulator's ability to hire independent experts for specialized transaction review and financial testing is "essential." It was noted that different states have varying levels of access to expert resources.
  7. Due Process. "Robust due process" must be afforded to policyholders, claimants, reinsurers, guaranty associations, regulators and others that are affected by a transaction, in advance of any public hearing. These constituencies should have access to information concerning the transaction.

The "best practices" document goes into some additional detail on each prong of the foundational principles above.

The foundational principles and best practices documents were exposed for a 45-day comment period.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More