Don't Forget Deception: FTC And Biometrics

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
Contributor
Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
With the ongoing BIPA litigation activity in Illinois surrounding collection of biometrics, it can be easy to forget that other issues might surround this practice.
United States Privacy
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Listen to this post

With the ongoing BIPA litigation activity in Illinois surrounding collection of biometrics, it can be easy to forget that other issues might surround this practice. Last month the FTC reminded companies not to forget general privacy and data security concerns. Concerns as most know, it enforces under Section 5 of the FTC Act (which prohibits deception and unfairness).

The FTC recognized that there may be an uptick in companies desire to collect biometrics through machine learning. Or, to use biometric information to understand people's characteristics. The FTC's issuance of this policy statement suggests it may bring biometric-related actions in the coming months. Its warnings can thus be a helpful signal of things not to do.

Some recommendations to avoid potential allegations of deception and unfairness include:

  • Not making unsubstantiated or false claims about the efficacy of technologies that use biometrics. For example, selling products to business consumers that do not work, and the result being consumer harm.
  • Avoiding deceptive claims about how the company uses biometrics. This includes both misleading a consumer about what biometric information is collected. It also means not deceiving people about how information might be used.
  • Assessing and addressing foreseeable harms. Potential harms could be where a company knows technology is prone to errors, but fails to take steps to prevent them. Appropriate steps would be to find and put in place "readily available tools" to reduce risks.
  • Not "surreptitiously" collecting biometric information. This also covers "unexpected" collection of that information that exposes someone to harm. Those might include, for example, stalking or reputational harm.
  • Evaluating the third parties that will have access biometric information. Appropriate measures, according to the FTC, include both contractual obligations for vendors to minimize risks to consumers and vendor oversight.
  • Training employees. In particular, those who interact with biometric information or technologies that collect or use it.

Putting It into Practice: The FTC has signaled with this policy statement what activities it deems unfair or deceptive in the biometric space. Companies can keep these in mind, in addition to state law obligations of notice and choice.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Don't Forget Deception: FTC And Biometrics

United States Privacy
Contributor
Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More